Holtzer Roee, Verghese Joe, Wang Cuiling, Hall Charles B, Lipton Richard B
Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
JAMA. 2008 Aug 20;300(7):823-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.7.823.
Neuropsychological tests are used to predict and diagnose dementia. However, to our knowledge, no studies to date have examined whether within-person across-neuropsychological test variability predicts dementia.
To examine whether within-person across-neuropsychological test variability predicts future dementia.
The Einstein Aging Study (EAS) is a population-based longitudinal study of aging and dementia located in Bronx County, New York. We used Cox proportional hazards models using age as the time scale to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for performance on individual neuropsychological tests (Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, Digit Symbol Substitution subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised, and the Vocabulary subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised) and for within-person across-neuropsychological test variability as predictors of incident dementia. Analyses were stratified by sex, and controlled for education and medical illness.
A total of 1797 participants (age > or = 70 years) enrolled in the EAS between October 1993 and December 2007. Participants seen for the baseline visit only (n = 750), prevalent dementia cases (n = 72), and those with missing follow-up information (n = 78) were excluded. A total of 897 individuals were included in this investigation. Participants had follow-up visits every 12 to 18 months.
Incident dementia.
Sixty-one cases of incident dementia were identified during follow-up (mean [SD], 3.3 [2.4] years), of which 26 were in the highest quartile of within-person across-neuropsychological test variability. Adjusting for sex, education, and medical illness, variability was associated with incident dementia (HR for 1-point difference in variability, 3.93 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.04-7.56]). The association persisted even after adjusting for level of performance on individual neuropsychological tests (HR for 1-point difference in variability, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.04-4.23]). Comparing Cox models using neuropsychological tests with and without within-person across-neuropsychological test variability showed that the former improved the prediction of dementia. Sensitivity in a model predicting dementia at 1 year also improved when neuropsychological test variability was included.
In this population, within-person across-neuropsychological test variability was associated with development of incident dementia independent of neuropsychological test performance. This finding needs to be confirmed in future studies.
神经心理学测试用于预测和诊断痴呆症。然而,据我们所知,迄今为止尚无研究探讨个体内部神经心理学测试结果的变异性是否能预测痴呆症。
研究个体内部神经心理学测试结果的变异性是否能预测未来患痴呆症的风险。
爱因斯坦衰老研究(EAS)是一项基于纽约州布朗克斯县的以人群为基础的衰老与痴呆症纵向研究。我们使用以年龄为时间尺度的Cox比例风险模型,来估计个体神经心理学测试(自由和线索选择性回忆测试、韦氏成人智力量表修订版数字符号替换分测验以及韦氏成人智力量表修订版词汇分测验)表现的风险比(HRs),以及个体内部神经心理学测试结果变异性作为新发痴呆症预测指标的风险比。分析按性别分层,并对教育程度和疾病进行了控制。
1993年10月至2007年12月期间共有1797名参与者(年龄≥70岁)纳入EAS研究。仅进行了基线访视的参与者(n = 750)、已患痴呆症患者(n = 72)以及随访信息缺失的参与者(n = 78)被排除。本研究共纳入897名个体。参与者每12至18个月进行一次随访。
新发痴呆症。
随访期间共确诊61例新发痴呆症(平均[标准差],3.3[2.4]年),其中26例处于个体内部神经心理学测试结果变异性最高的四分位数区间。在对性别、教育程度和疾病进行校正后,变异性与新发痴呆症相关(变异性每相差1分的HR为3.93[95%置信区间{CI},2.04 - 7.56])。即使在对个体神经心理学测试表现水平进行校正后,这种关联仍然存在(变异性每相差1分的HR为2.10[95%CI,1.04 - 4.23])。比较使用和未使用个体内部神经心理学测试结果变异性的神经心理学测试Cox模型表明,前者改善了痴呆症的预测。当纳入神经心理学测试变异性时,预测1年内痴呆症模型的敏感性也有所提高。
在该人群中,个体内部神经心理学测试结果的变异性与新发痴呆症的发生相关,且独立于神经心理学测试表现。这一发现需要在未来研究中得到证实。