Baker Darren, Fortune Sarah
East London & City Mental Health Trust, London, UK.
Crisis. 2008;29(3):118-22. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910.29.3.118.
Self-harm and suicide websites have been heavily criticized both in the literature and the wider media, despite the fact that very little is known about them. To date, no study has interviewed users of these sites about them. This qualitative study aims to explore the accounts of young adults who engage in self-harming and suicidal behaviors and use websites dedicated to these issues, in order to develop a broader understanding of these websites and to identify potential implications for future research. In-depth interviews were conducted via e-mail with 10 participants, who were recruited directly from self-harm and suicide websites. Using discourse analysis, we identified three main ways in which participants wrote about the sites. They constructed them as sources of empathy and understanding, as communities, and as a way of coping with social and psychological distress. These discourses gave users access to important, socially valued identities, such as being understood, belonging to a community and coping with their problems. If health professionals and researchers hope to understand people who use self-harm and suicide websites, and engage them in their services, they must take a more balanced view and not focus solely on the possible risks associated with using such sites.
自残和自杀相关网站在文献及更广泛的媒体中都受到了严厉批评,尽管人们对它们了解甚少。迄今为止,尚无研究就这些网站对其用户进行过访谈。这项定性研究旨在探究那些有自残和自杀行为且使用专门讨论这些问题的网站的年轻人的叙述,以便更全面地了解这些网站,并确定对未来研究的潜在影响。通过电子邮件对10名参与者进行了深入访谈,这些参与者是直接从自残和自杀相关网站招募而来的。通过话语分析,我们确定了参与者描述这些网站的三种主要方式。他们将这些网站构建为共情与理解的来源、社区以及应对社会和心理困扰的一种方式。这些话语让用户获得了重要的、具有社会价值的身份认同,比如被理解、归属一个社区以及应对自身问题。如果健康专业人员和研究人员希望了解使用自残和自杀相关网站的人群,并让他们接受自己的服务,就必须采取更平衡的观点,而不仅仅关注使用此类网站可能存在的风险。