• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与欧洲结肠镜检查实践中息肉检出率相关的因素:欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)组的研究结果。

Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.

机构信息

Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy.

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 13;19(6):3388. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063388.

DOI:
10.3390/ijerph19063388
PMID:35329077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8954761/
Abstract

Background: The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group aims to raise awareness for improvement in colonoscopy standards across Europe. We analysed data collected on a sample of procedures conducted across Europe to evaluate the achievement of the polyp detection rate (PDR) target. We also investigated factors associated with PDR, in the hope of establishing areas that could lead to a quality improvement. Methods: 6445 form completions from 12 countries between 2 June 2016 and 30 April 2018 were considered for this analysis. We performed an exploratory analysis looking at PDR according to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) definition. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the most influential associated factors after adjusting for the other pre-specified variables. Results: In our sample there were 3365 screening and diagnostic procedures performed in those over 50 years. The PDR was 40.5%, which is comparable with the ESGE minimum standard of 40%. The variables found to be associated with PDR were in descending order: use of high-definition equipment, body mass index (BMI), patient gender, age group, and the reason for the procedure. Use of HD equipment was associated with a significant increase in the reporting of flat lesions (14.3% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.0001) and protruded lesions (34.7% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: On average, the sample of European practice captured by the ECQI survey meets the minimum PDR standard set by the ESGE. Our findings support the ESGE recommendation for routine use of HD colonoscopy.

摘要

背景

欧洲结肠镜质量调查(ECQI)小组旨在提高欧洲各地对改善结肠镜标准的认识。我们分析了在欧洲各地进行的一系列程序中收集的数据,以评估息肉检出率(PDR)目标的实现情况。我们还调查了与 PDR 相关的因素,希望确定可以提高质量的领域。

方法

2016 年 6 月 2 日至 2018 年 4 月 30 日,对来自 12 个国家的 6445 份表格完成情况进行了分析。我们进行了探索性分析,根据欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)的定义观察 PDR。进行逐步多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定在调整其他预定变量后最具影响力的相关因素。

结果

在我们的样本中,有 3365 例 50 岁以上人群进行了筛查和诊断程序。PDR 为 40.5%,与 ESGE 的最低标准 40%相当。与 PDR 相关的变量依次为:使用高清设备、体重指数(BMI)、患者性别、年龄组和进行检查的原因。使用高清设备与平坦病变(14.3%比 5.7%,p<0.0001)和凸起病变(34.7%比 25.4%,p<0.0001)的报告显著增加有关。

结论

平均而言,ECQI 调查中捕获的欧洲实践样本符合 ESGE 设定的最低 PDR 标准。我们的研究结果支持 ESGE 关于常规使用高清结肠镜的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c87/8954761/8d60000908b1/ijerph-19-03388-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c87/8954761/f9dbd000ef7d/ijerph-19-03388-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c87/8954761/8d60000908b1/ijerph-19-03388-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c87/8954761/f9dbd000ef7d/ijerph-19-03388-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c87/8954761/8d60000908b1/ijerph-19-03388-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.与欧洲结肠镜检查实践中息肉检出率相关的因素:欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)组的研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 13;19(6):3388. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063388.
2
Factors Associated with Withdrawal Time in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.欧洲结肠镜检查实践中与退镜时间相关的因素:欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)小组的研究结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 15;12(2):503. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020503.
3
Colonoscopy quality across Europe: a report of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.欧洲结肠镜检查质量:欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)小组报告
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Sep 16;9(10):E1456-E1462. doi: 10.1055/a-1486-6729. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.结肠镜检查的替代影像学方法:CT 结肠成像和结肠胶囊。欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)和欧洲胃肠道和腹部放射学会(ESGAR)指南 - 更新 2020 年。
Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):2967-2982. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07413-4.
5
High-definition colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate.高清结肠镜检查可提高腺瘤检出率。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):78-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4986-7. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
6
Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.最新代高清结肠镜检查可提高受训内镜医师的腺瘤检出率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2756-2762. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06543-5. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
7
The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.南非威特沃特斯兰德大学唐纳德·戈登医学中心结肠镜检查的“内幕”:门诊内镜科室的实践审核。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 27;110(12):1186-1190. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i12.14419.
8
The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.预测腺瘤检出率的转换因子因结肠镜检查适应证和患者性别而异。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jul;29(4):294-302. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000558.
9
Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.结肠镜检查的替代影像学方法:CT 结肠成像和结肠胶囊。欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)和欧洲胃肠道和腹部放射学会(ESGAR)指南-2020 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2020 Dec;52(12):1127-1141. doi: 10.1055/a-1258-4819. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.结直肠肿瘤的检测和鉴别诊断的高级影像学:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南-2019 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2019 Dec;51(12):1155-1179. doi: 10.1055/a-1031-7657. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Traditional and Novel Colonoscopy Quality Metrics: What's Important in 2025.传统与新型结肠镜检查质量指标:2025年的关键要点
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 Aug 8;27(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-01006-1.
2
Construction and validation of a machine learning algorithm-based predictive model for difficult colonoscopy insertion.基于机器学习算法的困难结肠镜插入预测模型的构建与验证
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):108307. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108307.
3
Anesthesia Assistance in Colonoscopy: Impact on Quality Indicators.

本文引用的文献

1
Colonoscopy quality across Europe: a report of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.欧洲结肠镜检查质量:欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)小组报告
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Sep 16;9(10):E1456-E1462. doi: 10.1055/a-1486-6729. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.最新代高清结肠镜检查可提高受训内镜医师的腺瘤检出率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2756-2762. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06543-5. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.
结肠镜检查中的麻醉辅助:对质量指标的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 12;9:872231. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.872231. eCollection 2022.
结直肠肿瘤的检测和鉴别诊断的高级影像学:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南-2019 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2019 Dec;51(12):1155-1179. doi: 10.1055/a-1031-7657. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing standard and high resolution optical technologies in colorectal cancer screening.比较标准和高分辨率光学技术用于结直肠癌筛查的多中心随机对照试验。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;10(3):244-252. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101130. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
5
Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta-analysis and systematic review.不同内镜检查方式对结直肠病变的检测比较:一项网状Meta分析和系统评价
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Jul;18(1):154-162. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7535. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
Impact of endoscopy system, high definition, and virtual chromoendoscopy in daily routine colonoscopy: a randomized trial.日常结肠镜检查中内镜系统、高清和虚拟 chromoendoscopy 的影响:一项随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2019 Mar;51(3):237-243. doi: 10.1055/a-0755-7471. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
7
Compared Abilities of Endoscopic Techniques to Increase Colon Adenoma Detection Rates: A Network Meta-analysis.内镜技术提高结直肠腺瘤检出率的能力比较:网状 Meta 分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov;17(12):2439-2454.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.058. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
8
Adoption of colonoscopy quality measures across Europe: the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group experience.欧洲范围内结肠镜检查质量指标的采用:欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)小组的经验。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Aug;6(7):1106-1107. doi: 10.1177/2050640618769706. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
9
Effects of two instrument-generation changes on adenoma detection rate during screening colonoscopy: results from a prospective randomized comparative study.两种内镜器械换代对筛查性结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照研究的结果。
Endoscopy. 2018 Sep;50(9):878-885. doi: 10.1055/a-0607-2636. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
10
Impact of 2 generational improvements in colonoscopes on adenoma miss rates: results of a prospective randomized multicenter tandem study.两代结肠镜对腺瘤检出率影响的前瞻性随机多中心串联研究结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 4.