• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social attention in keas, dogs, and human children.啄羊鹦鹉、狗和人类儿童的社会关注度。
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):181-92. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0181-0. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
2
When, what, and whom to watch? Quantifying attention in ravens (Corvus corax) and jackdaws (Corvus monedula).观察什么、何时观察以及观察谁?量化渡鸦(Corvus corax)和寒鸦(Corvus monedula)的注意力。
J Comp Psychol. 2007 Nov;121(4):380-6. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.380.
3
What you see is what you get? Exclusion performances in ravens and keas.所见即所得?鸦科和啄羊鹦鹉的排除表现。
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 5;4(8):e6368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006368.
4
Testing social learning in a wild mountain parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis).在野生山地鹦鹉啄羊鹦鹉(Nestor notabilis)中测试社会学习。
Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):62-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03196007.
5
Limited spread of innovation in a wild parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis).野生鹦鹉啄羊鹦鹉(Nestor notabilis)创新行为的有限传播。
Anim Cogn. 2006 Jul;9(3):173-81. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0018-7. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model.动物的技术智能:啄羊鹦鹉模型
Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0033-8. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
8
The role of head and body cues in visual individual recognition in grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus).头部和身体线索在灰鹦鹉(Psittacus erithacus)视觉个体识别中的作用。
J Comp Psychol. 2023 Nov;137(4):212-222. doi: 10.1037/com0000347. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
How do keas (Nestor notabilis) solve artificial-fruit problems with multiple locks?大斑鹦鹉(Nestor notabilis)如何解决具有多个锁的人工果实问题?
Anim Cogn. 2011 Jan;14(1):45-58. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0342-9. Epub 2010 Jul 18.
10
Effect of avian-human joint attention on allospecific vocal learning by grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus).禽-人共同注意对非洲灰鹦鹉(Psittacus erithacus)种间发声学习的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 1996 Sep;110(3):286-97. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.3.286.

引用本文的文献

1
After all, how valuable is the dog model for examining human socio-cognitive abilities?毕竟,狗模型对于研究人类社会认知能力有多大价值呢?
Biol Futur. 2025 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s42977-025-00273-3.
2
Familiar Dog or Familiar Person: Who Do Pet Dogs Best Synchronize with?熟悉的狗还是熟悉的人:宠物狗与谁的同步性最佳?
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;15(4):505. doi: 10.3390/ani15040505.
3
Social facilitation of trotting: Can horses perceive and adapt to the movement of another horse?社交促进小跑:马能否感知并适应另一只马的运动?
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0309474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309474. eCollection 2024.
4
From whom do animals learn? A meta-analysis on model-based social learning.动物从何而学?基于模型的社会学习的元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):863-881. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02236-4. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
5
A comparative test of inequity aversion in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and dingoes (Canis dingo).家犬(Canis familiaris)和澳洲野犬(Canis dingo)的不公平厌恶比较测试。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 22;16(9):e0255885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255885. eCollection 2021.
6
Experimental Tests for Measuring Individual Attentional Characteristics in Songbirds.用于测量鸣禽个体注意力特征的实验测试
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;11(8):2233. doi: 10.3390/ani11082233.
7
The Effect of Demonstrator Social Rank on the Attentiveness and Motivation of Pigs to Positively Interact with Their Human Caretakers.示范者社会等级对猪与人类饲养员积极互动的注意力和积极性的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;11(7):2140. doi: 10.3390/ani11072140.
8
Gorillas' (Gorilla g. gorilla) knowledge of conspecifics' affordances: intraspecific social tool use for food acquisition.大猩猩(Gorilla g. gorilla)对同种个体工具使用功能的认识:同种内社会工具使用获取食物。
Primates. 2020 Jul;61(4):583-591. doi: 10.1007/s10329-020-00805-6. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Pet dogs' relationships vary rather individually than according to partner's species.宠物狗的关系变化与其说是取决于伙伴的物种,不如说是个体差异较大。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 5;9(1):3437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40164-x.
10
Inequity aversion in dogs: a review.犬类的不公平厌恶:综述
Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):479-500. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0338-x.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of demonstrator age and number on duration of socially-induced food preferences in house mouse (Mus domesticus).示范者年龄和数量对家鼠(小家鼠)社会诱导性食物偏好持续时间的影响。
Behav Processes. 1997 Oct;41(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00029-6.
2
When, what, and whom to watch? Quantifying attention in ravens (Corvus corax) and jackdaws (Corvus monedula).观察什么、何时观察以及观察谁?量化渡鸦(Corvus corax)和寒鸦(Corvus monedula)的注意力。
J Comp Psychol. 2007 Nov;121(4):380-6. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.380.
3
Selective imitation in domestic dogs.家犬的选择性模仿。
Curr Biol. 2007 May 15;17(10):868-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.026. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
4
The role of social context and individual experience in novel task acquisition in cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus.社会环境和个体经验在棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus)新任务习得中的作用。
Anim Behav. 2006 Apr;71(4):933-943. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.09.007.
5
Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition.理解与共享意图:文化认知的起源
Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000129.
6
A comparative analysis of animals' understanding of the human pointing gesture.动物对人类指示手势理解的比较分析。
Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):81-93. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0008-1. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
7
A nonverbal test of knowledge attribution: a comparative study on dogs and children.知识归因的非语言测试:狗与儿童的比较研究。
Anim Cogn. 2006 Jan;9(1):13-26. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0257-z. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
8
Verbal attention getting as a key factor in social learning between dog (Canis familiaris) and human.言语吸引注意力是狗(家犬)与人类之间社会学习的关键因素。
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Dec;118(4):375-83. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.4.375.
9
Socially biased learning in monkeys.猴子的社会偏见学习
Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):24-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03196004.
10
Preferences towards novel foods in Cebus apella: the role of nutrients and social influences.卷尾猴对新食物的偏好:营养物质和社会影响的作用。
Physiol Behav. 2003 Nov;80(2-3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.08.004.

啄羊鹦鹉、狗和人类儿童的社会关注度。

Social attention in keas, dogs, and human children.

作者信息

Range Friederike, Horn Lisa, Bugnyar Thomas, Gajdon Gyula K, Huber Ludwig

机构信息

Department für Neurobiologie und Kognitionsforschung, Universität Wien, Althanstrasse 14, 1091, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):181-92. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0181-0. Epub 2008 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-008-0181-0
PMID:18716802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4415148/
Abstract

Understanding animals' abilities to cooperate with and learn from each other has been an active field of research in recent years. One important basis for all types of social interactions is the disposition of animals to pay attention to each other-a factor often neglected in discussions and experiments. Since attention differs between species as well as between individuals, it is likely to influence the amount and type of information different species and/or observers may extract from conspecifics in any given situation. Here, we carried out a standardized comparative study on attention towards a model demonstrating food-related behavior in keas, dogs and children. In a series of experimental sessions, individuals watched different conspecific models while searching, manipulating and feeding. Visual access to the demonstration was provided by two observation holes, which allowed us to determine exactly how often and for how long observers watched the model. We found profound differences in the factors that influence attention within as well as between the tested species. This study suggests that attention should be incorporated as an important variable when testing species in social situations.

摘要

近年来,了解动物相互合作与学习的能力一直是一个活跃的研究领域。所有类型社会互动的一个重要基础是动物相互关注的倾向——这一因素在讨论和实验中常常被忽视。由于不同物种之间以及个体之间的注意力存在差异,它很可能会影响不同物种和/或观察者在任何给定情况下从同种个体中提取的信息数量和类型。在此,我们针对啄羊鹦鹉、狗和儿童对展示与食物相关行为的模型的注意力进行了一项标准化比较研究。在一系列实验环节中,个体在搜索、操作和进食时观看不同的同种模型。通过两个观察孔提供对演示的视觉观察,这使我们能够确切确定观察者观看模型的频率和时长。我们发现在受试物种内部以及不同受试物种之间,影响注意力的因素存在显著差异。这项研究表明,在对物种进行社会情境测试时,应将注意力作为一个重要变量纳入考量。