Odemuyiwa O, Malik M, Farrell T, Bashir Y, Poloniecki J, Camm J
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Cardiol. 1991 Aug 15;68(5):434-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90774-f.
Heart rate (HR) variability index and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) were compared for the prediction of all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events and sudden death in 385 survivors of acute myocardial infarction. For arrhythmic events, where, for a sensitivity of 75%, HR variability index had a specificity of 76%, EF had a specificity of only 45%. An EF of less than or equal to 40% had a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 75% for arrhythmic events; for the same sensitivity an HR variability index of 20 U had a specificity of 92%. An EF less than or equal to 40% had a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 73% for sudden death; HR variability index had a specificity of 83% for the same sensitivity. For all cause mortality, where, for a sensitivity of 75%, HR variability index had a specificity of 52%, EF had a specificity of 40%. It is concluded that HR variability index appears a better predictor of important postinfarction arrhythmic complications than left ventricular EF, but both indexes perform equally well in predicting all-cause mortality.
在385例急性心肌梗死幸存者中,比较心率(HR)变异性指数和左心室射血分数(EF)对全因死亡率、心律失常事件和猝死的预测价值。对于心律失常事件,在敏感性为75%时,HR变异性指数的特异性为76%,而EF的特异性仅为45%。对于心律失常事件,左心室射血分数小于或等于40%时,敏感性为42%,特异性为75%;对于相同的敏感性,HR变异性指数为20 U时,特异性为92%。对于猝死,左心室射血分数小于或等于40%时,敏感性为40%,特异性为73%;对于相同的敏感性,HR变异性指数的特异性为83%。对于全因死亡率,在敏感性为75%时,HR变异性指数的特异性为52%,EF的特异性为40%。结论是,HR变异性指数似乎比左心室EF更能预测心肌梗死后重要的心律失常并发症,但在预测全因死亡率方面,这两个指标表现相当。