• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学中的证据与伦理

Evidence and ethics in medicine.

作者信息

Worrall John

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK.

出版信息

Perspect Biol Med. 2008 Summer;51(3):418-31. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0040.

DOI:10.1353/pbm.0.0040
PMID:18723945
Abstract

Ethics and epistemology in medicine are more closely and more interestingly intertwined than is usually recognized. To explore this relationship, I present a case study, clinical trials of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO; an intervention for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn).Three separate ethical issues that arise from this case study-whether or not it is ethical to perform a certain trial at all, whether stopping rules for trials are ethically mandated, and the issue of informed consent-are all shown to be intimately related to epistemological judgments about the weight of evidence. Although ethical issues cannot, of course, be resolved by consideration of epistemological findings, I argue that no informed view of the ethical issues that are raised can be adopted without first taking an informed view of the evidential-epistemological ones.

摘要

医学中的伦理学与认识论之间的相互交织比通常所认识到的更为紧密且有趣。为探讨这种关系,我呈现一个案例研究,即体外膜肺氧合(ECMO;一种针对新生儿持续性肺动脉高压的干预措施)的临床试验。该案例研究引发了三个不同的伦理问题——进行某项试验本身是否合乎伦理、试验的终止规则是否在伦理上具有强制性以及知情同意问题——所有这些都表明与关于证据权重的认识论判断密切相关。当然,伦理问题不能通过考虑认识论研究结果来解决,但我认为,如果不首先对证据认识论问题有明智的看法,就无法对所提出的伦理问题形成明智的观点。

相似文献

1
Evidence and ethics in medicine.医学中的证据与伦理
Perspect Biol Med. 2008 Summer;51(3):418-31. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0040.
2
Clinical trials in neonates: ethical issues.新生儿临床试验:伦理问题。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Aug;12(4):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.01.023. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
3
The epistemology and ethics of chronic disease research: further lessons from ECMO.慢性病研究的认识论和伦理学:从 ECMO 中得到的更多教训。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2010 Apr;31(2):107-22. doi: 10.1007/s11017-010-9139-8.
4
Is a placebo-controlled surgical trial an oxymoron?安慰剂对照的外科手术试验是一种矛盾修饰法吗?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.12.006.
5
Randomized, controlled trials as minimal risk: an ethical analysis.作为最低风险的随机对照试验:一项伦理分析。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):940-4. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000257333.95528.B8.
6
Extracorporeal life support: utilization, cost, controversy, and ethics of trying to save lives.体外生命支持:挽救生命的应用、成本、争议与伦理
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Sep;13(3):183-91. doi: 10.1177/1089253209347385. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
7
Ethical considerations in clinical investigation: exploring relevance in haemophilia research.临床研究中的伦理考量:血友病研究中的相关性探索
Haemophilia. 2008 Jul;14 Suppl 3:122-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01738.x.
8
[Ethical problems of the clinical placebo use].[临床使用安慰剂的伦理问题]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Sep 10;129(37):1939-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-831367.
9
Ethics, evidence, and public policy.伦理、证据与公共政策。
Perspect Biol Med. 2005 Autumn;48(4):548-56. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2005.0091.
10
Ethical issues in evidence-based surgery.循证外科中的伦理问题。
Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;86(1):151-68, x. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.10.003.

引用本文的文献

1
From Efficacy to Effectiveness: Evaluating Psychedelic Randomized Controlled Trials for Trustworthy Evidence-Based Policy and Practice.从疗效到效果:评估迷幻药随机对照试验以获取可靠的循证政策与实践依据
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2025 Apr;13(2):e70097. doi: 10.1002/prp2.70097.
2
Ethical challenges for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in the evolving evidence landscape.不断变化的证据格局下,卫生技术评估(HTA)面临的伦理挑战。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 4;40(1):e39. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000394.
3
Disagreement among experts about public health decision making: is it polarisation and does it matter?
专家在公共卫生决策方面的意见分歧:这是两极分化吗?有影响吗?
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Mar;8(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011182.
4
Ethics in extracorporeal life support: a narrative review.体外生命支持中的伦理学:叙事性综述。
Crit Care. 2021 Jul 21;25(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03689-0.
5
Protocol for a systematic scoping review of reasons given to justify the performance of randomised controlled trials.关于为证明随机对照试验的实施合理性而给出的理由的系统范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 26;9(7):e027575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027575.
6
Should RCT's be used as the gold standard for evidence based medicine?随机对照试验应该被用作循证医学的金标准吗?
Integr Med Res. 2019 Mar;8(1):31-32. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
7
Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials.理解与误解随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:2-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
8
The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the analytical (theoretical/philosophical) research.关于早产儿或患病新生儿临床试验同意书的伦理问题:一项分析性(理论/哲学)研究的系统综述(框架综合)
Trials. 2016 Sep 9;17(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1562-3.
9
The ethics of clinical trials.临床试验的伦理规范
Ecancermedicalscience. 2014 Jan 16;8:387. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2014.387. eCollection 2014.
10
Ethics of clinical science in a public health emergency: drug discovery at the bedside.公共卫生紧急事件中的临床科学伦理:床边药物发现。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(9):3-14. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.813597.