Chiesa Marco, Fonagy Peter, Bateman Anthony W, Mace Chris
Personality Disorder Outreach and Research, The Cassel Hospital, Richmond, Surrey, UK.
Psychol Psychother. 2009 Mar;82(Pt 1):83-98. doi: 10.1348/147608308X339512. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
Little is known about socio-demographic, diagnostic, and clinical characteristics of patients referred for assessment to psychodynamic psychotherapy services. The aim of this study was to remedy this by prospectively collecting comprehensive and systematic demographic and clinical information on a large number of patients referred to NHS psychodynamic psychotherapy services.
Fourteen psychotherapy services operating within a National Health Service joined the study and contributed data for 1,136 patients referred from primary and secondary care clinics.
Patients were assessed using questionnaires and self-rated measures, which included the clinician-based version of the diagnostic form of the Millon clinical multi-axial inventory-III-revised edition (MCMI-III-R), the brief symptom inventory (BSI), the inventory of interpersonal problems (IIP), and the clinical outcome in routine evaluation (CORE). The pathway from assessment through to treatment and variables associated with treatment uptake and exclusion are described and examined.
Most patients were in the moderate to severe range of psychiatric severity at the time of presentation. Ninety-five percent met clinically based criteria for a psychiatric disorder (mostly anxiety and mood disorders) and/or personality disorder. Although the majority of patients were found suitable for treatment (N=935, 82%), analysis of uptake showed relatively high rates of treatment rejection by patients and treatment drop-out. Partial outcome data at 6-month follow-up after intake into treatment revealed significant change but modest effect size (d=0.35).
Systematic collection of baseline and outcome data would provide a national database of the performance of psychotherapy services that would be invaluable in facilitating comparative studies.
对于被转介至心理动力心理治疗服务机构进行评估的患者的社会人口学、诊断及临床特征,我们知之甚少。本研究的目的是通过前瞻性地收集大量被转介至英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)心理动力心理治疗服务机构的患者的全面且系统的人口学和临床信息来弥补这一不足。
14家在国家医疗服务体系内运营的心理治疗服务机构参与了本研究,并提供了从初级和二级保健诊所转介的1136名患者的数据。
使用问卷和自评量表对患者进行评估,这些量表包括基于临床医生版的明尼苏达多项人格调查表第三版修订版(MCMI - III - R)诊断表、简明症状量表(BSI)、人际问题量表(IIP)以及常规评估中的临床结果(CORE)。描述并研究了从评估到治疗的路径以及与治疗接受和排除相关的变量。
大多数患者就诊时的精神疾病严重程度处于中度至重度范围。95%的患者符合基于临床的精神障碍(主要是焦虑和情绪障碍)和/或人格障碍标准。尽管大多数患者被认为适合治疗(N = 935,82%),但对治疗接受情况的分析显示患者拒绝治疗和退出治疗的比例相对较高。治疗开始后6个月随访时的部分结果数据显示有显著变化,但效应量较小(d = 0.35)。
系统收集基线和结果数据将提供一个关于心理治疗服务表现的全国性数据库,这对于促进比较研究将具有不可估量的价值。