• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过教育加强夫妻关系:社会政策与公共卫生视角

Strengthening couples' relationships with education: social policy and public health perspectives.

作者信息

Halford W Kim, Markman Howard J, Stanley Scott

机构信息

School of Psychology, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2008 Aug;22(4):497-505. doi: 10.1037/a0012789.

DOI:10.1037/a0012789
PMID:18729664
Abstract

There is some evidence that skill-based couples relationship education (CRE) enhances couples' maintenance of healthy, committed relationships. This article analyzes issues in the balancing of a limited but growing knowledge base on the effects of CRE with current social policy that is creating an impetus for widespread dissemination of CRE. It is suggested that enough is known to act now, and that by doing so, the field has a unique opportunity to substantially (and rapidly) add to the existing knowledge base. Specifically, there can be expansion of knowledge of the efficacy of CRE with diverse populations and service delivery contexts, as well as the influences on the reach of CRE to populations at high risk of future relationship difficulties. While the current article focuses on CRE, the issues discussed have relevance to warrant dissemination to many areas of family psychology intervention.

摘要

有证据表明,基于技能的夫妻关系教育(CRE)能促进夫妻维持健康、忠诚的关系。本文分析了在平衡关于CRE效果的有限但不断增长的知识库与当前推动CRE广泛传播的社会政策方面的问题。有人认为,现在已有足够的知识可以采取行动,而且这样做的话,该领域有一个独特的机会大幅(且迅速)扩充现有知识库。具体而言,可以扩充关于CRE在不同人群和服务提供背景下的效果的知识,以及对CRE覆盖未来关系困难高风险人群的影响的知识。虽然本文聚焦于CRE,但所讨论的问题具有相关性,值得推广到家庭心理干预的许多领域。

相似文献

1
Strengthening couples' relationships with education: social policy and public health perspectives.通过教育加强夫妻关系:社会政策与公共卫生视角
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Aug;22(4):497-505. doi: 10.1037/a0012789.
2
Assisting couples to develop healthy relationships: effects of couples relationship education on cortisol.帮助夫妻建立健康关系:夫妻关系教育对皮质醇的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Jun;36(5):597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.07.019. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
3
Do couples at high risk of relationship problems attend premarriage education?存在关系问题高风险的情侣会参加婚前教育吗?
J Fam Psychol. 2006 Mar;20(1):160-3. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.160.
4
Commitment in same-sex relationships: A qualitative analysis of couples' conversations.同性关系中的承诺:对情侣对话的质性分析。
J Homosex. 2006;51(3):199-223. doi: 10.1300/J082v51n03_10.
5
Couples Relationship Education and Couples Therapy: Healthy Marriage or Strange Bedfellows?夫妻关系教育与夫妻治疗:是健康婚姻还是怪异组合?
Fam Process. 2015 Dec;54(4):655-71. doi: 10.1111/famp.12191. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
6
Governing couple-sexuality: publically funded couples' courses in Norway.夫妻性生活管理:挪威公共资助的夫妻课程。
Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(6):645-58. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2012.676671.
7
Psycho-education to enhance couples' transition to parenthood.开展心理教育以促进夫妻向父母角色的转变。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;28(7):1125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.03.005. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
8
International perspectives on couple relationship education.关于伴侣关系教育的国际视角。
Fam Process. 2005 Jun;44(2):139-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00049.x.
9
Self-expansion and flow in couples' momentary experiences: an experience sampling study.夫妻即时体验中的自我扩展与流畅感:一项体验抽样研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):679-94. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.679.
10
[Policy counselling through public health reporting?].通过公共卫生报告进行政策咨询?
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Oct;69(10):527-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-992163.

引用本文的文献

1
Couple relationship education content: What we have and what we are missing.夫妻关系教育内容:我们所拥有的和我们所缺失的。
Fam Process. 2024 Dec;63(4):1790-1806. doi: 10.1111/famp.13043. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Revisiting "ill will versus poor skill": Relationship dissatisfaction, intimate partner violence, and observed "communication skills deficits".重新审视“恶意与技能不足”:关系不满意、亲密伴侣暴力与观察到的“沟通技能缺陷”。
Fam Process. 2023 Sep;62(3):1233-1252. doi: 10.1111/famp.12834. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
3
The Concept of Withdrawal of Divorce Petition Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Qualitative Study.
基于计划行为理论的离婚申请撤回概念:一项定性研究
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 May 17;6(5):917-924. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.195. eCollection 2018 May 20.
4
Long-term effects of mental disorders on marital outcomes in the National Comorbidity Survey ten-year follow-up.《国家共病调查十年随访:精神障碍对婚姻结局的长期影响》
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1217-1226. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1373-1. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Family Instability and Young Children's School Adjustment: Callousness and Negative Internal Representations as Mediators.家庭不稳定与幼儿学校适应:冷酷无情和消极的内部表象作为中介。
Child Dev. 2018 Jul;89(4):1193-1208. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12793. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
6
Effectiveness of a relationship enrichment program for couples living with multiple sclerosis.针对多发性硬化症患者夫妻的关系强化项目的有效性。
Int J MS Care. 2013 Spring;15(1):27-34. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2012-002.
7
The acceptability of parenting strategies for grandparents providing care to their grandchildren.祖父母照顾孙辈时育儿策略的可接受性。
Prev Sci. 2014 Oct;15(5):777-87. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0428-0.
8
Using Consumer Input to Tailor Evidence-Based Parenting Interventions to the Needs of Grandparents.利用消费者反馈,使循证育儿干预措施契合祖父母的需求。
J Child Fam Stud. 2012 Aug 1;21(4):626-636. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9514-8.
9
Family conflict, emotional security, and child development: translating research findings into a prevention program for community families.家庭冲突、情感安全与儿童发展:将研究发现转化为社区家庭的预防计划。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2012 Mar;15(1):14-27. doi: 10.1007/s10567-012-0112-0.
10
Where's the action? Understanding what works and why in relationship education.行动在哪里?理解关系教育中什么有效以及为什么有效。
Behav Ther. 2012 Mar;43(1):99-112. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 May 30.