Fidler I J, Kataoka T, Hanna M G
Cancer Res. 1976 Dec;36(12):4459-66.
The cell-mediated reactivity (CMR) in vitro of normal, line 10 hepatocardinoma tumor-bearing, Bacillus Calmette Guérin (BCG)-line 10 tumor-cured, and line 1 sensitized guinea pigs against synegeneic line 10 hepatocarcinma was measured. This study was designed to determine whether the in vitro CMR correlates with the clinical stage of disease in a guinea pig immunotherapy model. A comparison was also made between the CMR of effector cells from active regional lymph nodes, pooled distant lymph nodes and spleen non-glass-adherent mononuclear cells (lymphocytes), peritoneal exudate macrophages (PEM), and peripheral blood leukocytes. In addition, the immunological specificity of the in vitro cytotoxicity was investigated by comparing the reactivities against line 10 and the highly antigenic syngeneic line 1 hepatocarcinoma as well as normal syngeneic guinea pig embryo cells. Pooled lymphocytes and PEM from normal guinea pigs were cytotoxic to line 1 hepatocarcinoma cells but not to line 10 hepatocarcinoma cells. Pooled lymphocytes and PEM obtained from animals sensitized in vivo to line 1 tumor exhibited in vitro cytotoxicity against line 1 cells, which was comparable to that cytotoxicity obtained from normal, naive donors. Various effector cells from BCG-tumor-cured guinea pigs destroyed line 10 cells but to different degrees. In the order of their decreasing cytotoxic effect against line 10 cells, the effector cells from BCG-tumor-cured guinea pigs were: glass-adherent regional lymph node cells and PEM, followed by non-glass-adherent regional lymph node cells, peripheral blood leukocytes, and pooled spleen and lymph node lymphocytes. Effector cells obtained from animals bearing line 10 tumors were all cytotoxic in vitro against line 10 cells. There were no qualitative differences in CMR between effector cells of tumor-bearing and BCG-tumor-cured guinea pigs. Although some quantitative differences between tumor-bearing and tumor-cured guinea pigs were observed, these differences were not large enough to reliably predict the clinical status of the donor in a blind test.
测定了正常豚鼠、携带10号线肝癌的豚鼠、卡介苗(BCG)治愈10号线肿瘤的豚鼠以及用1号线致敏的豚鼠针对同基因10号线肝癌的体外细胞介导反应性(CMR)。本研究旨在确定在豚鼠免疫治疗模型中,体外CMR是否与疾病的临床分期相关。还比较了来自活性区域淋巴结、汇集的远处淋巴结和脾脏非玻璃黏附单核细胞(淋巴细胞)、腹腔渗出巨噬细胞(PEM)以及外周血白细胞的效应细胞的CMR。此外,通过比较针对10号线和高抗原性同基因1号线肝癌以及正常同基因豚鼠胚胎细胞的反应性,研究了体外细胞毒性的免疫特异性。正常豚鼠的汇集淋巴细胞和PEM对1号线肝癌细胞具有细胞毒性,但对10号线肝癌细胞无细胞毒性。从体内对1号线肿瘤致敏的动物获得的汇集淋巴细胞和PEM在体外对1号线细胞表现出细胞毒性,其与从正常未致敏供体获得的细胞毒性相当。来自卡介苗治愈肿瘤的豚鼠的各种效应细胞对10号线细胞有破坏作用,但程度不同。按照对10号线细胞细胞毒性作用递减的顺序,来自卡介苗治愈肿瘤的豚鼠的效应细胞依次为:玻璃黏附区域淋巴结细胞和PEM,其次是非玻璃黏附区域淋巴结细胞、外周血白细胞以及汇集的脾脏和淋巴结淋巴细胞。从携带10号线肿瘤的动物获得的效应细胞在体外对10号线细胞均具有细胞毒性。携带肿瘤的豚鼠和卡介苗治愈肿瘤的豚鼠的效应细胞之间在CMR上没有质的差异。虽然观察到携带肿瘤的豚鼠和治愈肿瘤的豚鼠之间存在一些量的差异,但这些差异不足以在盲法试验中可靠地预测供体的临床状态。