Siegel R A, MacGregor R D, Hunt C A
Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0446.
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1991 Jun;19(3):363-73; discussion 373-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03036257.
A simple stochastic recirculatory formalism is used to compare models of regional drug delivery due to Hunt et al. and Boddy and Aarons. It is shown that these two models are equivalent when regional delivery is ideal. The latter model has the advantage of simplicity. However, the former model appears more useful in relating predictions to experimentally accessible quantities. Neither model is sufficiently general to cover all possible topologies of regions associated with drug response and toxicity. Knowledge of this topology is essential in determining the drug targeting index. The underlying assumptions of the models are discussed, and situations where these assumptions may break down are identified. Finally, it is noted that the analysis of regional delivery may also apply to metabolite and prodrug kinetics.
使用一种简单的随机再循环形式主义来比较亨特等人以及博迪和阿伦斯提出的区域药物递送模型。结果表明,当区域递送理想时,这两个模型是等效的。后一个模型具有简单的优点。然而,前一个模型在将预测与实验可获取的量相关联方面似乎更有用。这两个模型都不够通用,无法涵盖与药物反应和毒性相关的所有可能区域拓扑结构。这种拓扑结构的知识对于确定药物靶向指数至关重要。讨论了模型的基本假设,并确定了这些假设可能不成立的情况。最后,需要指出的是,区域递送分析也可能适用于代谢物和前药动力学。