• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原核生物转录调控网络进化的一般趋势。

General trends in the evolution of prokaryotic transcriptional regulatory networks.

作者信息

Babu M Madan, Balaji S, Aravind L

机构信息

National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md., USA.

出版信息

Genome Dyn. 2007;3:66-80. doi: 10.1159/000107604.

DOI:10.1159/000107604
PMID:18753785
Abstract

Gene expression in organisms is controlled by regulatory proteins termed transcription factors, which recognize and bind to specific nucleotide sequences. Over the years, considerable information has accumulated on the regulatory interactions between transcription factors and their target genes in various model prokaryotes, such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. This has allowed the representation of this information in the form of a directed graph, which is commonly referred to as the transcriptional regulatory network. The network representation provides us with an excellent conceptual framework to understand the structure of the transcriptional regulation, both at local and global levels of organization. Several studies suggest that the transcriptional network inferred from model organisms may be approximated by a scale-free topology, which in turn implies the presence of a relatively small group of highly connected regulators (hubs or global regulators). While the graph theoretical principles have been applied to infer various properties of such networks, there have been few studies that have actually investigated the evolution of the transcriptional regulatory networks across diverse organisms. Using recently developed computational methods that exploit various evolutionary principles, we have attempted to reconstruct and compare these networks across a wide-range of prokaryotes. This has provided several insights on the modification and diversification of network structures of various organisms in course of evolution. Firstly, we observed that target genes show a much higher level of conservation than their transcriptional regulators. This in turn suggested that the same set of functions could be differently controlled across diverse organisms, contributing significantly to their adaptive radiations. In particular, at the local level of network structure, organism-specific optimization of the transcription network has evolved primarily via tinkering of individual regulatory interactions rather than whole scale reuse or deletion of network motifs (local structure). In turn, as phylogenetic diversification proceeds, this process appears to have favored repeated convergence to scale-free-like structures, albeit with different regulatory hubs.

摘要

生物体中的基因表达由称为转录因子的调节蛋白控制,这些转录因子识别并结合特定的核苷酸序列。多年来,在各种模式原核生物(如大肠杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌)中,转录因子与其靶基因之间的调节相互作用积累了大量信息。这使得这些信息能够以有向图的形式呈现,通常称为转录调控网络。网络表示为我们提供了一个极好的概念框架,用于在局部和全局组织水平上理解转录调控的结构。几项研究表明,从模式生物推断出的转录网络可能近似于无标度拓扑结构,这反过来意味着存在相对较少的一组高度连接的调节因子(枢纽或全局调节因子)。虽然图论原理已被应用于推断此类网络的各种属性,但实际上很少有研究调查转录调控网络在不同生物体中的进化。利用最近开发的利用各种进化原理的计算方法,我们试图在广泛的原核生物中重建和比较这些网络。这为各种生物体在进化过程中网络结构的修改和多样化提供了一些见解。首先,我们观察到靶基因的保守程度远高于其转录调节因子。这反过来表明,同一组功能在不同生物体中可能受到不同的控制,这对它们的适应性辐射有很大贡献。特别是,在网络结构的局部水平上,转录网络的生物体特异性优化主要是通过调整个体调节相互作用而不是通过整个网络基序(局部结构)的重复使用或删除来实现的。反过来,随着系统发育多样化的进行,这个过程似乎有利于反复收敛到类似无标度的结构,尽管具有不同的调节枢纽。

相似文献

1
General trends in the evolution of prokaryotic transcriptional regulatory networks.原核生物转录调控网络进化的一般趋势。
Genome Dyn. 2007;3:66-80. doi: 10.1159/000107604.
2
Evolutionary dynamics of prokaryotic transcriptional regulatory networks.原核生物转录调控网络的进化动力学
J Mol Biol. 2006 Apr 28;358(2):614-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.02.019. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
3
Prokaryotic regulatory systems biology: Common principles governing the functional architectures of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli unveiled by the natural decomposition approach.原核生物调控系统生物学:通过自然分解方法揭示了枯草芽孢杆菌和大肠杆菌功能架构的普遍原则。
J Biotechnol. 2012 Oct 31;161(3):278-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.028. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
4
Structure and evolution of transcriptional regulatory networks.转录调控网络的结构与进化
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004 Jun;14(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.05.004.
5
Comparing genomes to computer operating systems in terms of the topology and evolution of their regulatory control networks.将基因组比作计算机操作系统,从调控控制网络的拓扑结构和进化方面进行比较。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 18;107(20):9186-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914771107. Epub 2010 May 3.
6
Interplay between network structures, regulatory modes and sensing mechanisms of transcription factors in the transcriptional regulatory network of E. coli.大肠杆菌转录调控网络中网络结构、调控模式及转录因子传感机制之间的相互作用
J Mol Biol. 2007 Sep 28;372(4):1108-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.084. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
7
The two faces of short-range evolutionary dynamics of regulatory modes in bacterial transcriptional regulatory networks.细菌转录调控网络中调控模式的短程进化动力学的两面性。
Bioessays. 2007 Jul;29(7):625-9. doi: 10.1002/bies.20600.
8
Evolution of reduced co-activator dependence led to target expansion of a starvation response pathway.对共激活因子依赖性降低的演变导致了饥饿反应途径的靶标扩展。
Elife. 2017 May 9;6:e25157. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25157.
9
Impact of Transcription Units rearrangement on the evolution of the regulatory network of gamma-proteobacteria.转录单元重排对γ-变形菌调控网络进化的影响
BMC Genomics. 2008 Mar 17;9:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-128.
10
Early Career Research Award Lecture. Structure, evolution and dynamics of transcriptional regulatory networks.青年学者研究奖演讲。转录调控网络的结构、进化和动态。
Biochem Soc Trans. 2010 Oct;38(5):1155-78. doi: 10.1042/BST0381155.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiplexed Strain Phenotyping Defines Consequences of Genetic Diversity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis for Infection and Vaccination Outcomes.多重应变表型定义了结核分枝杆菌遗传多样性对感染和疫苗接种结果的影响。
mSystems. 2022 Jun 28;7(3):e0011022. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00110-22. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
2
Adenovirus E1A targets the DREF nuclear factor to regulate virus gene expression, DNA replication, and growth.腺病毒E1A靶向DREF核因子以调控病毒基因表达、DNA复制和生长。
J Virol. 2014 Nov;88(22):13469-81. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02538-14. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
3
Evolution of transcriptional regulation in closely related bacteria.
密切相关细菌中转录调控的进化。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Oct 6;12:200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-200.
4
Insights from the architecture of the bacterial transcription apparatus.从细菌转录装置的结构中获得的见解。
J Struct Biol. 2012 Sep;179(3):299-319. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.12.013. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
5
The cyst-dividing bacterium Ramlibacter tataouinensis TTB310 genome reveals a well-stocked toolbox for adaptation to a desert environment.塔图因分枝杆菌 TTB310 基因组揭示了其适应沙漠环境的丰富工具库。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023784. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
6
Genome-wide functional annotation and structural verification of metabolic ORFeome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.莱茵衣藻代谢 ORFeome 的全基因组功能注释和结构验证。
BMC Genomics. 2011 Jun 15;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-S1-S4.
7
A naturally occurring polymorphism at Drosophila melanogaster Lim3 Locus, a homolog of human LHX3/4, affects Lim3 transcription and fly lifespan.果蝇 Lim3 基因座的一种自然发生的多态性,是人类 LHX3/4 的同源物,影响 Lim3 转录和果蝇寿命。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 7;5(9):e12621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012621.
8
Built shallow to maintain homeostasis and persistent infection: insight into the transcriptional regulatory network of the gastric human pathogen Helicobacter pylori.为维持体内平衡和持续性感染而构建的浅度:对胃幽门螺杆菌这种人类病原体的转录调控网络的深入了解。
PLoS Pathog. 2010 Jun 10;6(6):e1000938. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000938.
9
NFIL3 and cAMP response element-binding protein form a transcriptional feedforward loop that controls neuronal regeneration-associated gene expression.NFIL3 和 cAMP 反应元件结合蛋白形成转录前馈环,控制与神经元再生相关的基因表达。
J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 9;29(49):15542-50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3938-09.2009.
10
Underlying principles of natural selection in network evolution: systems biology approach.网络进化中自然选择的基本原理:系统生物学方法。
Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Sep 26;3:245-62.