撒哈拉以南非洲地区通过男性包皮环切术预防艾滋病:对象、方式及时机?
Male circumcision for HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa: who, what and when?
作者信息
White Richard G, Glynn Judith R, Orroth Kate K, Freeman Esther E, Bakker Roel, Weiss Helen A, Kumaranayake Lilani, Habbema J Dik F, Buvé Anne, Hayes Richard J
机构信息
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
出版信息
AIDS. 2008 Sep 12;22(14):1841-50. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830e0137.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Male circumcision (circumcision) reduces HIV incidence in men by 50-60%. The United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) recommends the provision of safe circumcision services in countries with high HIV and low circumcision prevalence, prioritizing 12-30 years old HIV-uninfected men. We explore how the population-level impact of circumcision varies by target age group, coverage, time-to-scale-up, level of risk compensation and circumcision of HIV infected men.
DESIGN AND METHODS
An individual-based model was fitted to the characteristics of a typical high-HIV-prevalence population in sub-Saharan Africa and three scenarios of individual-level impact corresponding to the central and the 95% confidence level estimates from the Kenyan circumcision trial. The simulated intervention increased the prevalence of circumcision from 25 to 75% over 5 years in targeted age groups. The impact and cost-effectiveness of the intervention were calculated over 2-50 years. Future costs and effects were discounted and compared with the present value of lifetime HIV treatment costs (US$ 4043).
RESULTS
Initially, targeting men older than the United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS recommended age group may be the most cost-effective strategy, but targeting any adult age group will be cost-saving. Substantial risk compensation could negate impact, particularly if already circumcised men compensate. If circumcision prevalence in HIV uninfected men increases less because HIV-infected men are also circumcised, this will reduce impact in men but would have little effect on population-level impact in women.
CONCLUSION
Circumcision is a cost-saving intervention in a wide range of scenarios of HIV and initial circumcision prevalence but the United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS/WHO recommended target age group should be widened to include older HIV-uninfected men and counselling should be targeted at both newly and already circumcised men to minimize risk compensation. To maximize infections-averted, circumcision must be scaled up rapidly while maintaining quality.
背景与目的
男性包皮环切术可使男性感染艾滋病毒的几率降低50%至60%。联合国艾滋病规划署(UNAIDS)建议,在艾滋病毒感染率高且包皮环切术普及率低的国家,提供安全的包皮环切服务,优先考虑12至30岁未感染艾滋病毒的男性。我们探讨了包皮环切术对人群的影响如何因目标年龄组、覆盖率、扩大规模的时间、风险补偿水平以及对感染艾滋病毒男性的包皮环切情况而有所不同。
设计与方法
基于个体的模型根据撒哈拉以南非洲典型的高艾滋病毒感染率人群的特征以及肯尼亚包皮环切术试验中个体层面影响的三种情况(对应于中心估计值和95%置信水平估计值)进行拟合。模拟干预措施在5年内将目标年龄组的包皮环切术普及率从25%提高到75%。在2至50年的时间里计算干预措施的影响和成本效益。对未来成本和效果进行贴现,并与终身艾滋病毒治疗成本的现值(4043美元)进行比较。
结果
最初,将目标设定为高于联合国艾滋病规划署建议年龄组的男性可能是最具成本效益的策略,但针对任何成年年龄组都将节省成本。大量的风险补偿可能会抵消影响,尤其是如果已接受包皮环切术的男性进行补偿的话。如果未感染艾滋病毒男性的包皮环切术普及率因感染艾滋病毒男性也接受了包皮环切术而增加较少,这将减少对男性的影响,但对女性人群层面的影响几乎没有作用。
结论
在艾滋病毒感染情况和初始包皮环切术普及率的多种情况下,包皮环切术都是一种节省成本的干预措施,但联合国艾滋病规划署/世界卫生组织建议的目标年龄组应扩大到包括年龄较大的未感染艾滋病毒男性,并且咨询应针对新接受和已接受包皮环切术的男性,以尽量减少风险补偿。为了最大限度地避免感染,包皮环切术必须在保证质量的同时迅速扩大规模。