Miranda Marie Lynn, Keating Martha H, Edwards Sharon E
Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0328, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Aug 1;42(15):5407-14. doi: 10.1021/es7028119.
This paper presents a geographic information systems (GIS) methodology for evaluating the environmental justice implications of the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Burden Reduction Rule, which was issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in December 2006 under the authority of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986. This rule exempts industrial facilities meeting certain higher reporting thresholds from filing detailed reports about the quantities of chemicals used, released, or managed as waste. Our analytical approach examines demographic characteristics within a 1, 3, and 5 km buffer around a georeferenced facility location, applied on a national, regional, and state scale. The distance-based GIS analysis demonstrates that TRI facilities that are eligible for reduced reporting are more likely to be located in proximity to communities with a higher percentage of minority and low-income residents. The differences are more pronounced for percent minority and percent minority under age 5 in comparison to percent in poverty, and the demographic differences are more apparent at increasingly resolved geographic scales.
本文介绍了一种地理信息系统(GIS)方法,用于评估美国环境保护局于2006年12月根据1986年《应急规划与社区知情权法案》发布的《有毒物质排放清单(TRI)减负规则》对环境正义的影响。该规则豁免了达到某些更高报告阈值的工业设施提交有关作为废物使用、排放或管理的化学品数量的详细报告。我们的分析方法研究了地理参考设施位置周围1公里、3公里和5公里缓冲区内的人口特征,该方法应用于国家、区域和州层面。基于距离的GIS分析表明,有资格减少报告的TRI设施更有可能位于少数族裔和低收入居民比例较高的社区附近。与贫困率相比,少数族裔百分比和5岁以下少数族裔百分比的差异更为明显,并且在地理尺度分辨率越来越高的情况下,人口差异更加明显。