• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将环境正义纳入监管分析的框架。

A framework for integrating environmental justice in regulatory analysis.

机构信息

Office of Environmental Justice, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, MC 2201A, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jun;8(6):2366-85. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8062366. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph8062366
PMID:21776235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138030/
Abstract

With increased interest in integrating environmental justice into the process for developing environmental regulations in the United States, analysts and decision makers are confronted with the question of what methods and data can be used to assess disproportionate environmental health impacts. However, as a first step to identifying data and methods, it is important that analysts understand what information on equity impacts is needed for decision making. Such knowledge originates from clearly stated equity objectives and the reflection of those objectives throughout the analytical activities that characterize Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA), a process that is traditionally used to inform decision making. The framework proposed in this paper advocates structuring analyses to explicitly provide pre-defined output on equity impacts. Specifically, the proposed framework emphasizes: (a) defining equity objectives for the proposed regulatory action at the onset of the regulatory process, (b) identifying specific and related sub-objectives for key analytical steps in the RIA process, and (c) developing explicit analytical/research questions to assure that stated sub-objectives and objectives are met. In proposing this framework, it is envisioned that information on equity impacts informs decision-making in regulatory development, and that this is achieved through a systematic and consistent approach that assures linkages between stated equity objectives, regulatory analyses, selection of policy options, and the design of compliance and enforcement activities.

摘要

随着人们对将环境正义纳入美国制定环境法规过程的兴趣日益浓厚,分析人员和决策者面临着这样一个问题,即可以使用哪些方法和数据来评估不成比例的环境健康影响。然而,作为确定数据和方法的第一步,分析人员了解决策所需的公平影响信息是很重要的。这些知识源自明确规定的公平目标,并贯穿于监管影响分析(RIA)这一分析活动中,RIA 是传统上用于为决策提供信息的过程。本文提出的框架主张对分析进行结构化,以明确提供关于公平影响的预定义输出。具体来说,拟议的框架强调:(a)在监管过程开始时为拟议的监管行动定义公平目标,(b)确定 RIA 过程中关键分析步骤的具体和相关的次级目标,以及 (c)制定明确的分析/研究问题,以确保满足规定的次级目标和目标。通过提出这一框架,预计有关公平影响的信息将为监管发展中的决策提供信息,并且这是通过一种系统和一致的方法实现的,该方法确保了既定公平目标、监管分析、政策选择的选择以及合规和执行活动的设计之间的联系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f1/3138030/3008a751f371/ijerph-08-02366f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f1/3138030/162115218030/ijerph-08-02366f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f1/3138030/d9773e0310ee/ijerph-08-02366f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f1/3138030/3008a751f371/ijerph-08-02366f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f1/3138030/162115218030/ijerph-08-02366f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f1/3138030/d9773e0310ee/ijerph-08-02366f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f1/3138030/3008a751f371/ijerph-08-02366f3.jpg

相似文献

1
A framework for integrating environmental justice in regulatory analysis.将环境正义纳入监管分析的框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jun;8(6):2366-85. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8062366. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
2
Using health impact assessment to integrate environmental justice into federal environmental regulatory analysis.利用健康影响评估将环境正义纳入联邦环境监管分析。
New Solut. 2013;23(3):439-66.
3
Using health impact assessment to integrate environmental justice into federal environmental regulatory analysis.利用健康影响评估将环境正义纳入联邦环境监管分析。
New Solut. 2013 Jan 1;23(3):1-28. doi: 10.2190/NS.23.3.b.
4
Symposium on integrating the science of environmental justice into decision-making at the Environmental Protection Agency: an overview.环境署将环境正义科学纳入决策进程研讨会:概览
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19-26. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300368. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
5
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
6
Accounting for Health Risk Inequality in Regulatory Impact Analysis: Barriers and Opportunities.健康风险不平等在监管影响分析中的核算:障碍与机遇。
Risk Anal. 2021 Apr;41(4):610-618. doi: 10.1111/risa.13714. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
7
Bridging research and environmental regulatory processes: the role of knowledge brokers.搭建研究与环境监管流程之间的桥梁:知识中介的作用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(21):11985-92. doi: 10.1021/es4025244. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
8
Using inequality measures to incorporate environmental justice into regulatory analyses.利用不平等指标将环境正义纳入监管分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Aug 30;10(9):4039-59. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10094039.
9
Comparing Clean Water Act Section 316(b) policy options.比较《清洁水法》第316(b)条的政策选项。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2002 May 2;2 Suppl 1:106-38. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2002.176.
10
Comparing distributions of environmental outcomes for regulatory environmental justice analysis.比较监管环境正义分析中环境结果的分布。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 May;8(5):1707-26. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8051707. Epub 2011 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Place-based estimates of cigarette butt litter raise environmental justice concerns in the United States.基于地点的烟头垃圾估算引起了美国的环境正义担忧。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 15;19(8):e0308930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308930. eCollection 2024.
2
Using photovoice as a tool for community engagement to assess the environment and explore environmental health disparities.使用照片发声法作为社区参与的工具,以评估环境并探索环境健康差异。
J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2017 Fall;10(3):68-86.
3
Symposium on integrating the science of environmental justice into decision-making at the Environmental Protection Agency: an overview.

本文引用的文献

1
Maximizing health benefits and minimizing inequality: incorporating local-scale data in the design and evaluation of air quality policies.最大化健康效益,最小化不平等:在空气质量政策的设计和评估中纳入地方尺度数据。
Risk Anal. 2011 Jun;31(6):908-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01629.x. Epub 2011 May 26.
2
An index for assessing demographic inequalities in cumulative environmental hazards with application to Los Angeles, California.评估累积环境危害的人口不平等指数及其在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的应用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Oct 15;43(20):7626-34. doi: 10.1021/es901041p.
3
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. A report of the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH) 2008.
环境署将环境正义科学纳入决策进程研讨会:概览
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19-26. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300368. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
一代人之内消除差距:通过对健康的社会决定因素采取行动实现健康公平。世界卫生组织健康问题社会决定因素委员会(CSDH)2008年报告。
Community Dent Health. 2009 Mar;26(1):2-3.
4
Neighborhood psychosocial hazards and the association of cumulative lead dose with cognitive function in older adults.社区心理社会风险因素以及老年人累积铅剂量与认知功能的关联。
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Mar 15;169(6):683-92. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn390. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
5
Evaluating efficiency-equality tradeoffs for mobile source control strategies in an urban area.评估城市地区移动源控制策略的效率与公平权衡。
Risk Anal. 2009 Jan;29(1):34-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01119.x. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
6
Environmental justice implications of reduced reporting requirements of the Toxics Release Inventory Burden Reduction Rule.《有毒物质排放清单减负规则》报告要求降低所涉及的环境正义问题。
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Aug 1;42(15):5407-14. doi: 10.1021/es7028119.
7
Neighborhood psychosocial hazards and cardiovascular disease: the Baltimore Memory Study.邻里社会心理风险与心血管疾病:巴尔的摩记忆研究
Am J Public Health. 2008 Sep;98(9):1664-70. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.125138. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
8
Stress as a potential modifier of the impact of lead levels on blood pressure: the normative aging study.压力作为铅水平对血压影响的潜在调节因素:规范老化研究
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Aug;115(8):1154-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10002.
9
Quantifying the efficiency and equity implications of power plant air pollution control strategies in the United States.量化美国发电厂空气污染控制策略的效率和公平影响。
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 May;115(5):743-50. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9712. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
10
Incorporating concepts of inequality and inequity into health benefits analysis.将不平等和不公平的概念纳入健康效益分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2006 Mar 28;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-5-2.