Leo Posthuma, Eijsackers Herman J P, Koelmans Albert A, Vijver Martina G
National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Laboratory for Ecological Risk Assessment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Sci Total Environ. 2008 Dec 1;406(3):503-17. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.065. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
Many Dutch ecosystems, whether terrestrial, aquatic or sediment-based, are diffusely polluted by mixtures of contaminants, whose concentrations often exceed regulatory Safe Values or other generic quality criteria. This situation has unclear consequences, especially when local authorities are confronted with such pollution. Water managers are frequently in doubt whether their water systems satisfy the criteria for 'Good Ecological Status' as defined in the EU's Water Framework Directive. In case of soils, soil users may wonder whether the soil is 'fit for use'. In case of nature conservation, the problem is that protected species might suffer from toxic stress. Official regulations in these cases call for appropriate action, but it is unclear whether the diffuse exposure causes adverse effects, and what the action should be. This paper proposes and discusses a site-oriented approach in the risk assessment of diffusely contaminated sites that can be used in addition to the compound-oriented policies from which the abovementioned generic quality criteria were derived. The site-oriented approach can be of help in reducing site-specific risks of diffuse contamination. Reflecting on the results of a large Dutch research effort in systems-oriented ecotoxicological effects, the conclusion is drawn that exposure and effects of diffuse pollution are site-specific in kind and magnitude, determined by the local combination of source-pathway-receptor issues, and often not clearly detectable (though often present). To assist in risk management, higher-tier methods can address various aspects, like addressing local mixture composition, bioavailability, and sensitivity of local species groups. Higher-tier risk assessment methods have as yet been developed mainly for cases of serious contamination, like for pesticide management and Risk-Based Land Management. For diffuse pollution, site-specific information can also be used to obtain site-specific exposure and impact information, while practical and ecology-based approaches can be introduced to obtain an integrated overview of the meaning of site contamination and to derive options for managing and reducing the local risks. These issues are discussed against the background of current major policy shifts, in The Netherlands and elsewhere, from a pollutant-oriented assessment to an additional ecological and site-oriented assessment. The latter is most clearly represented in the Good Ecological Status aim of the EU-Water Framework Directive. The paper assesses, integrates and discusses the results of the Dutch research effort in this policy context.
许多荷兰的生态系统,无论是陆地、水生还是基于沉积物的,都受到污染物混合物的分散污染,其浓度常常超过监管安全值或其他通用质量标准。这种情况的后果尚不明朗,尤其是当地方当局面临此类污染时。水资源管理者常常怀疑他们的水系统是否符合欧盟水框架指令中所定义的“良好生态状态”标准。就土壤而言,土壤使用者可能会疑惑土壤是否“适合使用”。在自然保护方面,问题在于受保护物种可能会遭受毒性压力。在这些情况下,官方规定要求采取适当行动,但尚不清楚这种分散暴露是否会导致不利影响,以及应该采取何种行动。本文提出并讨论了一种针对分散污染场地风险评估的以场地为导向的方法,该方法除了可用于上述通用质量标准所源自的以化合物为导向的政策之外。以场地为导向的方法有助于降低分散污染的特定场地风险。通过反思荷兰在面向系统的生态毒理学效应方面的一项大型研究成果,得出的结论是,分散污染的暴露和影响在种类和程度上是特定于场地的,由源 - 途径 - 受体问题的局部组合所决定,并且往往难以清晰检测到(尽管通常存在)。为协助风险管理,更高级别的方法可以解决各个方面的问题,比如处理局部混合物组成、生物可利用性以及当地物种群体的敏感性。更高级别的风险评估方法目前主要是针对严重污染情况开发的,如农药管理和基于风险的土地管理。对于分散污染,特定场地信息也可用于获取特定场地的暴露和影响信息,同时可以引入基于实践和生态的方法,以全面了解场地污染的意义,并得出管理和降低当地风险的方案。在荷兰和其他地方当前从以污染物为导向的评估向额外的生态和以场地为导向的评估的重大政策转变背景下,对这些问题进行了讨论。后者最明显地体现在欧盟水框架指令的良好生态状态目标中。本文在这一政策背景下评估、整合并讨论了荷兰研究工作的成果。