• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将理解哲学与认知科学相结合。

Integrating Philosophy of Understanding With the Cognitive Sciences.

作者信息

Khalifa Kareem, Islam Farhan, Gamboa J P, Wilkenfeld Daniel A, Kostić Daniel

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT, United States.

Independent Researcher, Madison, WI, United States.

出版信息

Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Mar 10;16:764708. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.764708. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2022.764708
PMID:35359623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8960449/
Abstract

We provide two programmatic frameworks for integrating philosophical research on understanding with complementary work in computer science, psychology, and neuroscience. First, philosophical theories of understanding have consequences about how agents should reason if they are to understand that can then be evaluated empirically by their concordance with findings in scientific studies of reasoning. Second, these studies use a multitude of explanations, and a philosophical theory of understanding is well suited to integrating these explanations in illuminating ways.

摘要

我们提供了两个编程框架,用于将关于理解的哲学研究与计算机科学、心理学和神经科学的互补性工作相结合。首先,理解的哲学理论对于主体若要实现理解应如何推理具有影响,然后可以通过它们与推理科学研究结果的一致性来进行实证评估。其次,这些研究使用了多种解释,而理解的哲学理论非常适合以具有启发性的方式整合这些解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1963/8960449/d93736a99949/fnsys-16-764708-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1963/8960449/d93736a99949/fnsys-16-764708-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1963/8960449/d93736a99949/fnsys-16-764708-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrating Philosophy of Understanding With the Cognitive Sciences.将理解哲学与认知科学相结合。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Mar 10;16:764708. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.764708. eCollection 2022.
2
[Science in the crosshairs of enlightenment. Significance of hypothetical thinking].[处于启蒙运动审视之下的科学。假设性思维的意义]
Acta Hist Leopoldina. 2011(57):99-130.
3
Why cognitive science needs philosophy and vice versa.为何认知科学需要哲学,反之亦然。
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;1(2):237-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01016.x.
4
A Reconciliation for the Future of Psychiatry: Both Folk Psychology and Cognitive Science.精神病学未来的一种调和:民间心理学与认知科学并重。
Front Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 16;7:12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00012. eCollection 2016.
5
Forms of explanation and understanding for neuroscience and artificial intelligence.神经科学和人工智能的解释和理解形式。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Dec 1;126(6):1860-1874. doi: 10.1152/jn.00195.2021. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
6
On the pursuitworthiness of qualitative methods in empirical philosophy of science.论科学经验哲学中定性方法的可追求性。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2023 Apr;98:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.12.009. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
7
How can philosophy be a true cognitive science discipline?哲学如何能成为一门真正的认知科学学科?
Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;2(3):357-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01088.x. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
8
Psychoanalysis and Neuropsychological Explanations.精神分析与神经心理学解释。
Psychoanal Rev. 2022 Dec;109(4):415-437. doi: 10.1521/prev.2022.109.4.415.
9
What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists).科学哲学中的概念分析应该是什么(以及为什么基因概念的相互竞争的哲学分析不能通过对科学家进行民意调查来检验)。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2004;26(1):29-58. doi: 10.1080/03919710412331341631.
10
Determinants of Judgments of Explanatory Power: Credibility, Generality, and Statistical Relevance.解释力判断的决定因素:可信度、普遍性和统计相关性。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 4;8:1430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01430. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Hematogenous metastasis and tumor dormancy as concepts or dogma? The continuum of vessel co-option and angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis as an alternative.血行转移与肿瘤休眠:是概念还是教条?以血管共选择与嗜血管性血管外游走转移的连续过程作为一种替代观点。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 11;12:996411. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.996411. eCollection 2022.
2
Using network models in person-centered care in psychiatry: How perspectivism could help to draw boundaries.在精神病学的以人为本的护理中使用网络模型:视角主义如何有助于划定界限。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 16;13:925187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.925187. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science.理论先行于检验:如何在心理科学中构建高拟真度的解释性理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):682-697. doi: 10.1177/1745691620970604. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Mechanistic and topological explanations in medicine: the case of medical genetics and network medicine.医学中的机制性解释与拓扑学解释:以医学遗传学和网络医学为例
Synthese. 2018;195(1):147-173. doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0983-y. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
3
General theory of topological explanations and explanatory asymmetry.
拓扑解释的一般理论与解释的不对称性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 13;375(1796):20190321. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0321. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
Inferring neural signalling directionality from undirected structural connectomes.从无向结构连接组推断神经信号传递方向。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 19;10(1):4289. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12201-w.
5
What if? Neural activity underlying semantic and episodic counterfactual thinking.如果呢?语义和情景反事实思维的神经活动基础。
Neuroimage. 2018 Sep;178:332-345. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.053. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
Network-Based Asymmetry of the Human Auditory System.基于网络的人类听觉系统的非对称性。
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Jul 1;28(7):2655-2664. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy101.
7
Are there two processes in reasoning? The dimensionality of inductive and deductive inferences.推理过程是否存在两个阶段?归纳推理和演绎推理的维度。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):218-244. doi: 10.1037/rev0000088. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
The seductive allure is a reductive allure: People prefer scientific explanations that contain logically irrelevant reductive information.这种诱人的魅力是一种简化的魅力:人们更喜欢包含逻辑上不相关的简化信息的科学解释。
Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Controllability of structural brain networks.大脑结构网络的可控性
Nat Commun. 2015 Oct 1;6:8414. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9414.
10
From Brain Maps to Cognitive Ontologies: Informatics and the Search for Mental Structure.从脑图谱到认知本体:信息学与对心理结构的探索
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:587-612. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033729. Epub 2015 Sep 21.