Douwes E, Crouch N R, Edwards T J, Mulholland D A
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa.
J Ethnopharmacol. 2008 Oct 28;119(3):356-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.07.040. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
Regression analyses of local medicinal floras are considered potentially useful when prioritising candidate plant taxa for pharmacological/bioprospecting investigations.
To identify plant orders and subsequently families within the highly diverse ethnomedicinal flora of southern Africa, towards which biases by traditional healers are demonstrable. Taxa so identified can subsequently be weighted appropriately in semi-quantitative selection systems.
Plant data sourced from the SANBI MedList database, the most comprehensive inventory of ethnomedicinal plants for the Flora of southern Africa region were grouped by order. A least squares regression analysis was applied to test the null hypothesis that the use of these plants by traditional healers is strictly random. Of 'hot' orders subsequently identified, characteristics of taxa therein were assessed to better determine the roles played by (i) growth forms, and (ii) inherent chemical diversity, in plant selections by ethnomedicinal practitioners.
Analyses identified seven principally 'hot' plant orders (Malpigiales, Fabales, Gentianales, Asteraceae, Solanales, Malvales and Sapindales) and 'hot' families therein from a total of 55 regional ethnomedicinal orders. Five 'cold' ethnomedicinal orders (Rosales, Proteales, Poales, Asparagales and Caryophyllales) were shown to be significantly less represented in the medicinal flora than predicted. No clear growth form preferences were identified across orders. The presence of highly diverse bioactives was evident in the 'hottest' plant families from 'hot' plant orders.
These 12 outliers identified by the regression analyses allowed for the falsification of the null hypothesis. Indications are that 'hot' taxa are selected traditionally on the basis of bioactivity, which is reflected in chemical diversity.
在对用于药理学/生物勘探研究的候选植物类群进行优先级排序时,对当地药用植物区系进行回归分析被认为可能有用。
在南非高度多样化的民族药用植物区系中识别植物目,随后识别科,以证明传统治疗师存在偏向性。如此识别出的分类群随后可在半定量选择系统中进行适当加权。
从南非国家生物多样性研究所(SANBI)MedList数据库获取植物数据,该数据库是南非植物区系民族药用植物最全面的清单,按目进行分组。应用最小二乘法回归分析来检验原假设,即传统治疗师对这些植物的使用是完全随机的。在随后识别出的“热门”目中,评估其中分类群的特征,以更好地确定(i)生长形式和(ii)内在化学多样性在民族医学从业者选择植物中所起的作用。
分析从总共55个区域民族药用目中识别出七个主要的“热门”植物目(金虎尾目、豆目、龙胆目、菊科、茄目、锦葵目和无患子目)及其内的“热门”科。五个“冷门”民族药用目(蔷薇目、山龙眼目、禾本目、天门冬目和石竹目)在药用植物区系中的代表性明显低于预期。各目之间未发现明显的生长形式偏好。在来自“热门”植物目的“最热”植物科中,存在高度多样的生物活性物质是显而易见的。
回归分析识别出的这12个异常值使得原假设被证伪。有迹象表明,“热门”分类群是传统上基于生物活性选择的,这在化学多样性中有所体现。