Swartjes Frank A, Carlon Claudio, de Wit Niek H S M
National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3730 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Sci Total Environ. 2008 Dec 1;406(3):523-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.034. Epub 2008 Aug 31.
Soil degradation, e.g. due to soil contamination, is a serious problem in Europe. Therefore, the European Commission believes that a comprehensive EU strategy for soil protection is required. With the purpose of supporting the European soil policy, the possibilities for a common approach in the EU-wide use of ecological risks assessment methodologies are explored. For over ten years now, ecological procedures used in different countries have been discussed in international fora. More recently, within the framework of the HERACLES network a review of ecological risk assessment tools was performed, among other things. From this study it can be concluded that the inclusion of ecological risk assessment in soil quality standards shows an increasing interest in many EU Member States. The study also shows that there are many procedures for ecological risk assessment readily available in several EU countries and will be readily available in even more Member States in the nearby future. Besides, this study clearly shows quite some variation in the ecological risk assessment tools and in the resulting soil quality standards in the different countries. Therefore, an effort was made to look for potential harmonisation of these tools within the European Union. Risk assessment tools used in soil quality assessment include both political and scientific elements, which are often interwoven. Insofar differences in the existing tools originate from geographical or cultural differences between Member States or from political choices, harmonisation is not at all regarded an option. Nevertheless, several differences between existing ecological risk assessment tools have been identified, that merely originate from scientific or technical aspects. These tools could be standardized, which means that there could be a uniform tool to be used everywhere throughout the EU. The development of these harmonised risk assessment tools will imply an intensive international cooperation, with the purpose of at least making the existing differences between those tools from the Member States transparent and to investigate the possibilities for coming to similar tools from a scientific/technical perspective.
土壤退化,例如由于土壤污染导致的退化,在欧洲是一个严重问题。因此,欧盟委员会认为需要一项全面的欧盟土壤保护战略。为了支持欧洲土壤政策,探索了在欧盟范围内共同采用生态风险评估方法的可能性。十多年来,不同国家使用的生态程序一直在国际论坛上进行讨论。最近,在赫拉克勒斯网络的框架内,除其他事项外,还对生态风险评估工具进行了审查。从这项研究可以得出结论,许多欧盟成员国对将生态风险评估纳入土壤质量标准的兴趣日益浓厚。该研究还表明,几个欧盟国家已经有许多生态风险评估程序可供使用,并且在不久的将来,更多成员国也将具备这些程序。此外,这项研究清楚地表明,不同国家的生态风险评估工具以及由此产生的土壤质量标准存在相当大的差异。因此,人们努力在欧盟内部寻求这些工具的潜在协调统一。用于土壤质量评估的风险评估工具包括政治和科学因素,它们常常相互交织。就现有工具的差异源于成员国之间的地理或文化差异或政治选择而言,根本不认为协调统一是一种选择。然而,已经确定了现有生态风险评估工具之间的一些差异,这些差异仅仅源于科学或技术方面。这些工具可以标准化,这意味着在整个欧盟可以使用统一的工具。开发这些协调统一的风险评估工具将意味着开展密集型国际合作,目的至少是使成员国这些工具之间的现有差异透明化,并从科学/技术角度研究形成类似工具的可能性。