Martinho Vítor João Pereira Domingues, Ferreira António José Dinis, Cunha Carlos, Pereira José Luís da Silva, Sánchez-Carreira María Del Carmen, Castanheira Nádia Luísa, Ramos Tiago Brito
School of Agriculture (ESAV) and CERNAS-IPV Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Portugal.
School of Agriculture (ESAC) and CERNAS Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Portugal.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 9;10(14):e34307. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34307. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
The literature shows that there are dimensions related to soil legislation and policy in the European Union contexts that can be better explored through bibliometric analysis, systematic reviews and quantitative approaches. Therefore, this research aims to analyse documents on soil legislation and policies, highlighting the specific cases of Portugal and the European Union (EU). The aim is to identify suggestions to improve the Portuguese and European Union soil policy instruments and measures. To achieve these objectives, a bibliometric analysis (considering text and bibliographic data) and systematic review were carried out, as well as a survey of the available soil legislation (considering qualitative data and quantitative analysis). The results show that soil legislation and policy have become more relevant in recent years and that concerns are about soil health, protection and safety, as well as risk mitigation, biodiversity preservation and the maintenance of ecosystem services. However, some topics could be further explored in future research, namely those related to multidisciplinarity, smart methodologies, soil salinisation, innovation and quantitative approaches to assessing policy impacts. This study presents suggestions that can be considered by the Portuguese and European Union policymakers to improve the respective soil legislation and policies. Defining a regulatory system for soils in the European Union has not been easy over time, although there have been attempts, given the specificities of the contexts related to soils and the reluctance of some member states to take certain measures. The approaches and analysis topics considered are innovative (there aren't many scientific documents on the topics that address bibliometric analysis and quantitative assessments with qualitative data) and bring novelty to the literature.
文献表明,在欧盟背景下,存在与土壤立法和政策相关的维度,通过文献计量分析、系统综述和定量方法可以更好地进行探讨。因此,本研究旨在分析关于土壤立法和政策的文献,突出葡萄牙和欧盟的具体案例。目的是确定改进葡萄牙和欧盟土壤政策工具及措施的建议。为实现这些目标,进行了文献计量分析(考虑文本和书目数据)和系统综述,以及对现有土壤立法的调查(考虑定性数据和定量分析)。结果表明,土壤立法和政策近年来变得更加重要,关注的是土壤健康、保护和安全,以及风险缓解、生物多样性保护和生态系统服务的维持。然而,一些主题在未来研究中可以进一步探讨,特别是那些与多学科性、智能方法、土壤盐渍化、创新以及评估政策影响的定量方法相关的主题。本研究提出了葡萄牙和欧盟政策制定者可考虑的建议,以改进各自的土壤立法和政策。随着时间的推移,在欧盟定义土壤监管体系并非易事,尽管有过尝试,但鉴于与土壤相关背景的特殊性以及一些成员国不愿采取某些措施。所考虑的方法和分析主题具有创新性(关于涉及文献计量分析和定性数据定量评估的主题的科学文献不多),并为文献带来了新颖性。