• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模伤亡事件分诊:数据评估及拟议国家指南的制定

Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national guideline.

作者信息

Lerner E Brooke, Schwartz Richard B, Coule Phillip L, Weinstein Eric S, Cone David C, Hunt Richard C, Sasser Scott M, Liu J Marc, Nudell Nikiah G, Wedmore Ian S, Hammond Jeffrey, Bulger Eileen M, Salomone Jeffrey P, Sanddal Teri L, Markenson David, O'Connor Robert E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008 Sep;2 Suppl 1:S25-34. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318182194e.

DOI:10.1097/DMP.0b013e318182194e
PMID:18769263
Abstract

Mass casualty triage is a critical skill. Although many systems exist to guide providers in making triage decisions, there is little scientific evidence available to demonstrate that any of the available systems have been validated. Furthermore, in the United States there is little consistency from one jurisdiction to the next in the application of mass casualty triage methodology. There are no nationally agreed upon categories or color designations. This review reports on a consensus committee process used to evaluate and compare commonly used triage systems, and to develop a proposed national mass casualty triage guideline. The proposed guideline, entitled SALT (sort, assess, life-saving interventions, treatment and/or transport) triage, was developed based on the best available science and consensus opinion. It incorporates aspects from all of the existing triage systems to create a single overarching guide for unifying the mass casualty triage process across the United States.

摘要

大规模伤亡事件分流是一项关键技能。尽管存在许多系统来指导医护人员做出分流决策,但几乎没有科学证据能证明任何现有系统已得到验证。此外,在美国,大规模伤亡事件分流方法在不同司法管辖区的应用缺乏一致性。没有全国统一认可的类别或颜色标识。本综述报告了一个共识委员会的工作过程,该过程用于评估和比较常用的分流系统,并制定一项拟议的国家大规模伤亡事件分流指南。拟议的指南名为SALT(分类、评估、救生干预、治疗和/或转运)分流,是基于现有最佳科学和共识意见制定的。它融合了所有现有分流系统的各个方面,以创建一个统一的总体指南,用于统一美国各地的大规模伤亡事件分流流程。

相似文献

1
Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national guideline.大规模伤亡事件分诊:数据评估及拟议国家指南的制定
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008 Sep;2 Suppl 1:S25-34. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318182194e.
2
Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the science and refinement of a national guideline.批量伤员检伤分类:国家指南的科学性和精细化评估。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011 Jun;5(2):129-37. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2011.39.
3
Model uniform core criteria for mass casualty triage.用于批量伤员分类的统一核心标准模型。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011 Jun;5(2):125-8. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2011.41.
4
Mass casualty triage: universal versus specific.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Jun;3(2):71-2; author reply 72. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819b0df2.
5
Science and evidence-based considerations for fulfilling the SALT triage framework.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Mar;4(1):10-2; author reply 12.
6
Pilot test of the SALT mass casualty triage system.SALT 大规模伤亡分诊系统的试点测试。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):536-40. doi: 10.1080/10903120802706252.
7
Use of SALT triage in a simulated mass-casualty incident.在模拟大规模伤亡事件中使用 SALT 分诊。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):21-5. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349812.
8
Pilot test of a proposed chemical/biological/radiation/ nuclear-capable mass casualty triage system.一个提议的具备化学/生物/辐射/核能力的大规模伤亡分诊系统的试点测试。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Apr-Jun;12(2):236-40. doi: 10.1080/10903120801907620.
9
Paramedic accuracy using SALT triage after a brief initial training.急救员在接受简短的初步培训后使用 SALT 分诊的准确率。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):526-32. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.569852. Epub 2011 May 18.
10
Randomized trial comparing two mass casualty triage systems (JumpSTART versus SALT) in a pediatric simulated mass casualty event.在儿科模拟大规模伤亡事件中比较两种大规模伤亡分诊系统(JumpSTART与SALT)的随机试验。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):417-23. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.882997. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-Fidelity, In Situ, Accessible Pediatric Mass Casualty Incident Simulation to Evaluate and Improve Pediatric Readiness.低逼真度、现场、可及的儿科大规模伤亡事件模拟,以评估和提高儿科应急准备能力。
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Jun 27;21:11538. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11538. eCollection 2025.
2
The Use of the Shock Index to Classify Patients During Mass-Casualty Incident Triage.在大规模伤亡事件分诊中使用休克指数对患者进行分类。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2025 Jun;40(3):156-161. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X25101209. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
3
Learner evaluation of an immersive virtual reality mass casualty incident simulator for triage training.
学习者对用于分诊培训的沉浸式虚拟现实大规模伤亡事件模拟器的评估。
BMC Digit Health. 2024;2(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s44247-024-00117-5. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
4
Development and validation of a prediction model for mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients.开发和验证一种针对危重症 COVID-19 患者死亡率的预测模型。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jun 24;14:1309529. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1309529. eCollection 2024.
5
SALT triage training and virtual reality demonstration.SALT分诊培训与虚拟现实演示。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Jun 24;5(3):e13203. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13203. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Implementation of a workshop for mass casualty incident triage training using an immersive virtual reality simulation.使用沉浸式虚拟现实模拟开展大规模伤亡事件分诊培训工作坊的实施情况。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 May 20;8(Suppl 1):S70-S75. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10939. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Comparative Analysis of META and SALT Disaster Triage in an Adult Trauma Population: A Retrospective Observational Study.成人创伤人群中META与SALT灾难分诊的比较分析:一项回顾性观察研究。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2024 Apr;39(2):142-150. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X24000098. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
8
Crossover design in triage education: the effectiveness of simulated interactive vs. routine training on student nurses' performance in a disaster situation.分诊教育中的交叉设计:模拟互动与常规培训对学生护士在灾难情境中表现的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Nov 5;16(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06596-5.
9
Triage in major incidents: development and external validation of novel machine learning-derived primary and secondary triage tools.重大事故分诊:新型机器学习衍生的主要和次要分诊工具的开发和外部验证。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Feb 20;41(3):176-183. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212440.
10
Sudden-Onset Disaster Mass-Casualty Incident Response: A Modified Delphi Study on Triage, Prehospital Life Support, and Processes.突发灾害大规模伤亡事件应对:分诊、院外生命支持和流程的改良德尔菲研究
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Oct;38(5):570-580. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006337. Epub 2023 Sep 7.