Camargo Maitê André, Roda Maria Inez, Marques Márcia Martins, de Cara Antonio Alberto
Departamento de Dentística, Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
J Dent. 2008 Nov;36(11):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the surface treatment and acid conditioning (AC) time of bovine sclerotic dentine on the micro-tensile bond strength (micro-TBS) to an etch and rinse adhesive system.
Thirty-six bovine incisors were divided into six groups (n=6): G1 sound dentine submitted to AC for 15s; G2-G6 sclerotic dentine: G2-AC for 15s; G3-AC for 30s; G4-EDTA and AC for 15s; G5-diamond bur and AC for 15s; G6-diamond paste and AC for 15s. An adhesive system was applied to the treated dentine surfaces followed by a hybrid composite inserted in increments and light cured. After 24h storage in water at 37 degrees C, the specimens were perpendicularly cut with a low-speed diamond saw to obtain beams (0.8 mm x 0.8 mm cross-sectional dimensions) for micro-TBS testing. Data was compared by ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p<or=0.05).
The mean micro-TBS was G1: 18.87+/-5.36 MPa; G2: 12.94+/-2.09 MPa; G3: 11.73+/-0.64 MPa; G4: 11.14+/-1.50 MPa; G5: 22.75+/-4.10 MPa; G6: 22.48+/-2.71 MPa. G1, G5 and G6 presented similar bond strengths significantly higher than those of all other groups.
The surface treatment of sclerotic dentine significantly influenced the bond strength to an adhesive system. Mechanical treatment, either using a diamond bur or a diamond paste was able to improve bonding to bovine sclerotic dentine, reaching values similar to bonding to sound dentine.
本研究的目的是评估牛硬化牙本质的表面处理和酸蚀处理(AC)时间对其与一种酸蚀冲洗粘结系统的微拉伸粘结强度(micro-TBS)的影响。
36颗牛切牙被分为六组(n = 6):G1组为正常牙本质,酸蚀15秒;G2 - G6组为硬化牙本质:G2组酸蚀15秒;G3组酸蚀30秒;G4组用乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)处理后酸蚀15秒;G5组用金刚砂车针处理后酸蚀15秒;G6组用金刚砂膏处理后酸蚀15秒。在处理后的牙本质表面应用一种粘结系统,随后分层填入复合树脂并光固化。在37℃水中储存24小时后,用低速金刚石锯垂直切割标本以获得用于微拉伸粘结强度测试的梁(横截面尺寸为0.8毫米×0.8毫米)。数据通过方差分析(ANOVA),然后进行Tukey检验(p≤0.05)进行比较。
微拉伸粘结强度的平均值为:G1组:18.87±5.36兆帕;G2组:12.94±2.09兆帕;G3组:11.73±0.64兆帕;G4组:11.14±1.50兆帕;G5组:22.75±4.10兆帕;G6组:22.48±2.71兆帕。G1、G5和G6组的粘结强度相似,显著高于所有其他组。
硬化牙本质的表面处理显著影响其与粘结系统的粘结强度。使用金刚砂车针或金刚砂膏进行机械处理能够改善与牛硬化牙本质的粘结,达到与正常牙本质粘结相似的值。