Verdun Francis R, Bochud François, Gundinchet François, Aroua Abbas, Schnyder Pierre, Meuli Reto
University Institute for Radiation Physics, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Radiographics. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(7):1807-16. doi: 10.1148/rg.287085042. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
The steady increase in the number of radiologic procedures being performed is undeniably having a beneficial impact on healthcare. However, it is also becoming common practice to quantify the health detriment from radiation exposure by calculating the number of cancer-related deaths inferred from the effective dose delivered to a given patient population. The inference of a certain number of expected deaths from the effective dose is to be discouraged, but it remains important as a means of raising professional awareness of the danger associated with ionizing radiation. The risk associated with a radiologic examination appears to be rather low compared with the natural risk. However, any added risk, no matter how small, is unacceptable if it does not benefit the patient. The concept of diagnostic reference levels should be used to reduce variations in practice among institutions and to promote optimal dose indicator ranges for specific imaging protocols. In general, the basic principles of radiation protection (eg, justification and optimization of a procedure) need to be respected to help counteract the unjustified explosion in the number of procedures being performed.
正在进行的放射检查数量稳步增加,无疑对医疗保健产生了有益影响。然而,通过计算给定患者群体所接受的有效剂量推断出的与癌症相关的死亡人数来量化辐射暴露对健康的损害,也正成为一种常见做法。不鼓励从有效剂量推断出一定数量的预期死亡人数,但作为提高专业人员对电离辐射相关危险认识的一种手段,它仍然很重要。与放射检查相关的风险与自然风险相比似乎相当低。然而,如果对患者没有益处,任何额外风险,无论多么小,都是不可接受的。应使用诊断参考水平的概念来减少各机构之间实践的差异,并促进特定成像方案的最佳剂量指标范围。一般来说,需要遵守辐射防护的基本原则(例如,检查的正当性和优化),以帮助应对正在进行的检查数量不合理的激增。