• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于从单一健康状态效用值预测关节健康状态效用值的线性指数。

A linear index for predicting joint health-states utilities from single health-states utilities.

作者信息

Basu Anirban, Dale William, Elstein Arthur, Meltzer David

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Center for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):403-19. doi: 10.1002/hec.1373.

DOI:10.1002/hec.1373
PMID:18773392
Abstract

Direct elicitation of utilities for joint health (JS) states may pose substantial interview burden, while traditional models to predict these utilities from utilities of component single states (SS) are inconsistent with the data. Using individual-level data on utilities for health states associated with prostate cancer, we report the performance of a new model that encompasses three traditional models - additive, multiplicative, and minimum - previously used for predicting utilities for joint health states. Describing utilities in terms of utility losses l(.) relative to prefect health, our final estimated linear index for predicting joint health-state utilities is El(JS)=0.05+0.72 x max l(SS1),l(SS2)+0.33.min x l(SS1),l(SS2)-0.18 x l(SS1) x l(SS2). Based on out-of-sample predictions, this model produces up to 50% reduction in mean-square error compared with traditional models and consistent prediction across different ranges of joint-state utilities, which the traditional models do not. Parameter estimates of the new model proposed here provide direct evidence on the inconsistencies of the traditional models, are grounded in psychological theory by emphasizing the more severe component of a joint health state, and provide a simple linear index to generate consistent predictions of utilities for joint health states. Further validation of this function for joint health states in other clinical scenarios is warranted.

摘要

直接获取关节健康(JS)状态的效用可能会带来巨大的访谈负担,而从单个组成状态(SS)的效用预测这些效用的传统模型与数据不一致。利用前列腺癌相关健康状态效用的个体层面数据,我们报告了一种新模型的性能,该模型包含三种先前用于预测关节健康状态效用的传统模型——加法模型、乘法模型和最小模型。用相对于完美健康的效用损失l(.)来描述效用,我们最终用于预测关节健康状态效用的估计线性指数为El(JS)=0.05 + 0.72 x max{l(SS1), l(SS2)} + 0.33 x min{l(SS1), l(SS2)} - 0.18 x l(SS1) x l(SS2)。基于样本外预测,与传统模型相比,该模型的均方误差降低了多达50%,并且在不同范围的关节状态效用上具有一致的预测,而传统模型则不具备。这里提出的新模型的参数估计为传统模型的不一致性提供了直接证据,通过强调关节健康状态中更严重的组成部分而基于心理学理论,并提供了一个简单的线性指数来生成关节健康状态效用的一致预测。有必要在其他临床场景中对该关节健康状态函数进行进一步验证。

相似文献

1
A linear index for predicting joint health-states utilities from single health-states utilities.一种用于从单一健康状态效用值预测关节健康状态效用值的线性指数。
Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):403-19. doi: 10.1002/hec.1373.
2
Predicting utility ratings for joint health States from single health States in prostate cancer: empirical testing of 3 alternative theories.从前列腺癌单一健康状态预测关节健康状态的效用评级:三种替代理论的实证检验
Med Decis Making. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):102-12. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07309639. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
3
The prevalence, correlates, and impact of logically inconsistent preferences in utility assessments for joint health states in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中联合健康状态效用评估中逻辑不一致偏好的流行率、相关性和影响。
Med Care. 2011 Jan;49(1):59-66. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f37bf2.
4
Predicting utility for joint health states: a general framework and a new nonparametric estimator.预测关节健康状况的效用:一个通用框架和一个新的非参数估计器。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):E29-39. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10374508. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
5
Invariance and inconsistency in utility ratings.效用评级中的不变性与不一致性。
Med Decis Making. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):158-67. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05275399.
6
Predicting utility scores for prostate cancer: mapping the Prostate Cancer Index to the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS).预测前列腺癌的效用评分:将前列腺癌指数映射到患者导向的前列腺效用量表(PORPUS)。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014 Mar;17(1):47-56. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2013.44. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
7
What is the best model for estimating joint health states utilities? Comparing the linear index model to the proportional decrement model.评估关节健康状态效用的最佳模型是什么?线性指数模型与比例递减模型的比较。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):531-3. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10381896.
8
The construction of standard gamble utilities.标准博弈效用的构建。
Health Econ. 2008 Jan;17(1):31-40. doi: 10.1002/hec.1235.
9
Towards a better QALY model.迈向更好的质量调整生命年模型。
Health Econ. 2006 Jul;15(7):665-76. doi: 10.1002/hec.1095.
10
The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement.前景理论与期望效用理论在健康效用测量中的预测有效性。
J Health Econ. 2009 Dec;28(6):1039-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Gynaecological cancer surveillance for women with Lynch syndrome: systematic review and cost-effectiveness evaluation.林奇综合征女性的妇科癌症监测:系统评价和成本效益评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(41):1-228. doi: 10.3310/VBXX6307.
2
Estimating Joint Health State Utility Algorithms Under Partial Information.在部分信息下估算联合健康状态效用算法。
Value Health. 2023 May;26(5):742-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.009. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
Cost burden and net monetary benefit loss of neonatal hypoglycaemia.新生儿低血糖的成本负担与净货币效益损失
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 5;21(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06098-9.
4
Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer.结直肠癌切除术后 CT 结肠成像监测的成本效益。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000450.
5
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utility Values of Patients and Partners Between 2007 and 2016.2007年至2016年间前列腺癌患者及其伴侣效用值的系统评价与荟萃分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 May 27;4(1):2381468319852332. doi: 10.1177/2381468319852332. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
6
Joint Utility Estimators in Substance Use Disorders.物质使用障碍中的联合效用估计器
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):458-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.2404. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
7
Clinical impact of treatment timing for chronic hepatitis C infection: a decision model.慢性丙型肝炎感染治疗时机的临床影响:一项决策模型
J Viral Hepat. 2015 Aug;22(8):630-8. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12412.
8
Examining the relationship between health-related quality of life and increasing numbers of diagnoses.研究健康相关生活质量与诊断数量增加之间的关系。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Dec;24(12):2823-32. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1026-3. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
9
Sourcing quality-of-life weights obtained from previous studies: theory and reality in Korea.借鉴以往研究中获得的生活质量权重:韩国的理论与现实
Patient. 2014;7(2):141-50. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0049-0.
10
The impact of co-morbidity burden on preference-based health-related quality of life in the United States.共病负担对美国基于偏好的健康相关生活质量的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 May;30(5):431-42. doi: 10.2165/11586840-000000000-00000.