Bensimhon Daniel R, Leifer Eric S, Ellis Stephen J, Fleg Jerome L, Keteyian Steven J, Piña Ileana L, Kitzman Dalane W, McKelvie Robert S, Kraus William E, Forman Daniel E, Kao Andrew J, Whellan David J, O'Connor Christopher M, Russell Stuart D
Lebauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Sep 15;102(6):712-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.047. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
Peak oxygen uptake (pVo2) is an important parameter in assessing the functional capacity and prognosis of patients with heart failure. In heart failure trials, change in pVo2 was often used to assess the effectiveness of an intervention. However, the within-subject variability of pVo2 on serial testing may limit its usefulness. This study was designed to evaluate the within-subject variability of pVo2 over 2 baseline cardiopulmonary exercise tests. As a substudy of the HF-ACTION trial, 398 subjects (73% men, 27% women; mean age 59 years) with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35% underwent 2 baseline cardiopulmonary exercise tests within 14 days. Mean pVo2 was unchanged from test 1 to test 2 (15.16 +/- 4.97 vs 15.18 +/- 4.97 ml/kg/min; p = 0.78). However, mean within-subject absolute change was 1.3 ml/kg/min (10th, 90th percentiles 0.1, 3.0), with 46% of subjects increasing and 48% decreasing on the second test. Other parameters, including the ventilation-to-carbon-dioxide production slope and Vo2 at ventilatory threshold, also showed significant within-subject variation with minimal mean differences between tests. In conclusion, pVo2 showed substantial within-subject variability in patients with heart failure and should be taken into account in clinical applications. However, on repeated baseline cardiopulmonary exercise tests, there appears to be no familiarization effect for Vo2 in patients with HF. Therefore, in multicenter trials, there is no need to perform >1 baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test.
峰值摄氧量(pVo2)是评估心力衰竭患者功能能力和预后的重要参数。在心力衰竭试验中,pVo2的变化常被用于评估干预措施的有效性。然而,连续测试时pVo2的受试者内变异性可能会限制其用途。本研究旨在评估在2次基线心肺运动试验中pVo2的受试者内变异性。作为HF-ACTION试验的一项子研究,398名心力衰竭且左心室射血分数≤35%的受试者(73%为男性,27%为女性;平均年龄59岁)在14天内接受了2次基线心肺运动试验。从测试1到测试2,平均pVo2没有变化(15.16±4.97 vs 15.18±4.97 ml/kg/min;p = 0.78)。然而,受试者内平均绝对变化为1.3 ml/kg/min(第10、90百分位数分别为0.1、3.0),46%的受试者在第二次测试时增加,48%的受试者减少。其他参数,包括通气与二氧化碳产生斜率以及通气阈值时的Vo2,也显示出显著的受试者内变异,测试之间的平均差异最小。总之,pVo2在心力衰竭患者中显示出较大的受试者内变异性,在临床应用中应予以考虑。然而,在重复进行基线心肺运动试验时,心力衰竭患者的Vo2似乎没有熟悉效应。因此,在多中心试验中,无需进行超过1次的基线心肺运动试验。