• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安全性以及对紧急医疗服务直接送往精神科中心转运协议的遵守情况。

Safety and compliance with an emergency medical service direct psychiatric center transport protocol.

作者信息

Cheney Paul, Haddock Tiffany, Sanchez Leslie, Ernst Amy, Weiss Steven

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;26(7):750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.019.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.019
PMID:18774037
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate compliance and safety of an emergency medical service (EMS) triage protocol that allows paramedics to transport patients directly to psychiatric emergency services.

METHODS

A psychiatric patient diversion protocol was developed for our system. Protocol compliance was evaluated the following 3 ways: (1) psychiatric facility intake forms completed by mental health workers on patients transported by EMS directly to a psychiatric emergency service (PES) bypassing the ED, (2) hospital records for patients who were redirected from PES to the ED for medical evaluation, (3) retrospective analysis of ambulance charts. Study outcomes included protocol noncompliance rate, protocol failure rate, and any morbidity associated with either noncompliance or protocol failure. Data were analyzed using proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients were directly transported to PES bypassing ED medical clearance. The protocol effectively screened for medical issues in 96% of cases. Protocol noncompliance occurred in 51 cases for a frequency of 29% (CI, 22%-36%). One patient in the paramedic noncompliance group required hospital admission. There was protocol failure in 5 (2.9%; 95% CI, 0.9-6.6) of the patients who fit all protocol requirements for transport to PES but required secondary transport to the ED. All were subsequently transferred back to PES. Nine patients (5.2%; CI, 2.7%-9.5%) required secondary transfer to the ED. No patient had critical or life-threatening problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency medical service providers showed a poor level of compliance with vital sign criteria, but the protocol provided a high level of safety.

摘要

目的

评估一项允许护理人员将患者直接转运至精神科急诊服务的紧急医疗服务(EMS)分诊方案的依从性和安全性。

方法

为我们的系统制定了一项精神科患者分流方案。通过以下三种方式评估方案依从性:(1)心理健康工作者针对由EMS直接转运至精神科急诊服务(PES)而绕过急诊科的患者填写的精神科机构入院表格;(2)从PES转至急诊科进行医学评估的患者的医院记录;(3)对救护车图表的回顾性分析。研究结果包括方案不依从率、方案失败率以及与不依从或方案失败相关的任何发病率。使用比例和95%置信区间(CI)对数据进行分析。

结果

共有174名患者被直接转运至PES,绕过了急诊科的医学检查。该方案在96%的病例中有效筛查出医学问题。51例出现方案不依从,频率为29%(CI,22%-36%)。护理人员不依从组中有1名患者需要住院治疗。在符合所有转运至PES方案要求但需要二次转运至急诊科的患者中,有5例(2.9%;95%CI,0.9-6.6)出现方案失败。所有患者随后均转回PES。9例患者(5.2%;CI,2.7%-9.5%)需要二次转至急诊科。没有患者出现危急或危及生命的问题。

结论

紧急医疗服务提供者对生命体征标准的依从性较差,但该方案提供了较高的安全性。

相似文献

1
Safety and compliance with an emergency medical service direct psychiatric center transport protocol.安全性以及对紧急医疗服务直接送往精神科中心转运协议的遵守情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;26(7):750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.019.
2
Prospective evaluation of an emergency medical services-administered alternative transport protocol.前瞻性评估一项由紧急医疗服务机构管理的替代转运方案。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):432-6. doi: 10.1080/10903120902935256.
3
Can emergency medical service staff predict the disposition of patients they are transporting?紧急医疗服务人员能否预测他们正在运送的患者的处置情况?
Emerg Med J. 2008 Oct;25(10):691-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.054924.
4
Can paramedics using guidelines accurately triage patients?使用指南的护理人员能否准确地对患者进行分诊?
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;38(3):268-77. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.117198.
5
Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care.为何无医疗需求的人会被救护车运送?一项关于院前护理指征的研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(3):151-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3280146508.
6
EMS triage and transport of intoxicated individuals to a detoxification facility instead of an emergency department.将中毒患者分诊并送往解毒中心,而不是急诊部,进行 EMS 转运。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;61(2):175-84. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
7
Field termination of resuscitation: analysis of a newly implemented protocol.复苏的现场终止:一项新实施方案的分析
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Jan-Mar;12(1):57-61. doi: 10.1080/10903120701707989.
8
A statewide, prehospital emergency medical service selective patient spine immobilization protocol.一项全州范围的院前紧急医疗服务选择性患者脊柱固定方案。
J Trauma. 2006 Jul;61(1):161-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000224214.72945.c4.
9
Impact of an emergency department closure on the local emergency medical services system.急诊科关闭对当地紧急医疗服务系统的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):198-203. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.640418. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
10
What are the characteristics and outcomes of nontransported pediatric patients?未转运的儿科患者有哪些特征和结局?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Jan-Mar;10(1):28-34. doi: 10.1080/10903120500373322.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of a prehospital emergency medical services protocol for an alternative destination for pediatric behavioral emergencies in Alameda County.阿拉米达县针对儿科行为紧急情况的替代目的地的院前紧急医疗服务协议的安全性。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Apr 9;4(2):e12930. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12930. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Creating a Pediatric Prehospital Destination Decision Tool Using a Modified Delphi Method.运用改良德尔菲法创建儿科院前目的地决策工具。
Children (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;8(8):658. doi: 10.3390/children8080658.
3
Pediatric Behavioral Health-Related EMS Encounters: A Statewide Analysis.
儿科行为健康相关的紧急医疗服务遭遇:全州范围分析。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;23(5):654-662. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1566423. Epub 2019 Feb 8.