• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人畸形手术的1年预后能否预测2年预后?

Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery?

作者信息

Glassman Steven D, Schwab Frank, Bridwell Keith H, Shaffrey Christopher, Horton William, Hu Serena

机构信息

Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.450. Epub 2008 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.450
PMID:18774752
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures are being used more frequently in the evaluation of the adult deformity patient. This is due in part to the validation of the deformity-specific Scolios Research Society-22 (SRS-22). Hence, relationships between HRQOL outcomes and traditional measures of success such as deformity correction, fusion healing, and complications are being established.

PURPOSE

To examine the pattern of HRQOL outcome responses after adult deformity surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of prospective multicenter cohort.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred and eighty-three adult deformity patients with preoperative, 1-, and 2-year postoperative outcome measures.

OUTCOME MEASURES

SRS-22, Short Form-12 (SF-12), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and back and leg pain numeric rating scale scores.

METHODS

Preoperative versus postoperative health status measures were evaluated by matched-pairs sample t test statistics and post hoc analysis of variance (ANOVA) findings.

RESULTS

SRS-22 improved from a mean 3.03 points at baseline to 3.21 points at 6 months, 3.71 points at 1 year, and 3.70 points at 2 years post-op. Mean ODI score was 37.0 points pre-op and improved to 27.0 points at 6 months, and 22.8 points at 1 and 2 years post-op. Mean SF-12 physical component score was 33.7 points at baseline, improving to 36.9 points at 6 months, 40.6 points at 1 year, and 40.5 points at 2 years post-op. Paired samples analysis comparing 6-month and 1-year post-op scores showed deterioration for numeric rating scale leg pain (p=0.05). There was a trend for improvement in SF-12 physical component score (p=0.06). Significant improvement between 6 months and 1 year post-op was noted for ODI (p=0.02) and SRS total score (p<0.0001). Comparison of 1- versus 2-year postoperative scores revealed no statistically significant differences for any of the HRQOL parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the application of HRQOL measures, including the deformity-specific SRS-22, as a valuable tool in the assessment of adult deformity patients. Change in outcome score stabilized after the 1-year postoperative interval, for most patients.

摘要

背景

与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)测量方法在成人脊柱畸形患者评估中使用得越来越频繁。部分原因是特定于脊柱畸形的脊柱侧凸研究学会-22(SRS-22)得到了验证。因此,HRQOL结果与诸如畸形矫正、融合愈合和并发症等传统成功指标之间的关系正在确立。

目的

研究成人脊柱畸形手术后HRQOL结果反应的模式。

研究设计

前瞻性多中心队列分析。

患者样本

283例有术前、术后1年和2年结果测量数据的成人脊柱畸形患者。

结果测量指标

SRS-22、简短健康调查问卷-12(SF-12)、奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI)以及腰腿痛数字评定量表评分。

方法

通过配对样本t检验统计量以及事后方差分析(ANOVA)结果评估术前与术后的健康状况测量指标。

结果

SRS-22评分从基线时的平均3.03分提高到术后6个月的3.21分、1年时的3.71分和2年时的3.70分。ODI平均评分术前为37.0分,术后6个月改善至27.0分,1年和2年时为22.8分。SF-12身体成分评分基线时为33.7分,术后6个月提高到36.9分,1年时为40.6分,2年时为40.5分。比较术后6个月和1年评分的配对样本分析显示,数字评定量表腿痛评分恶化(p = 0.05)。SF-12身体成分评分有改善趋势(p = 0.06)。术后6个月至1年期间,ODI(p = 0.02)和SRS总分(p < 0.0001)有显著改善。比较术后1年与2年的评分发现,任何HRQOL参数均无统计学显著差异。

结论

本研究支持将HRQOL测量方法,包括特定于脊柱畸形的SRS-22,作为评估成人脊柱畸形患者的有价值工具。对于大多数患者,术后1年间隔后结果评分变化趋于稳定。

相似文献

1
Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery?成人畸形手术的1年预后能否预测2年预后?
Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.450. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
2
MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.腰椎融合术的MOS简表36和奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数结果:一项多中心经验
Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.09.004.
3
Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.根据特定诊断指征分层的腰椎融合术结果。
Spine J. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.011. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
4
Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄减压手术后患者临床评估与自我评估的前瞻性分析
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
5
Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?SRS-22工具对接受原发性脊柱畸形手术的成年脊柱侧弯患者的变化有反应吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20):2220-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814cf120.
6
The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery.围手术期并发症对成人畸形手术临床结局的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):2764-70. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a7644.
7
Prospective assessment of axial back pain symptoms before and after bariatric weight reduction surgery.肥胖症减重手术前后轴向背痛症状的前瞻性评估。
Spine J. 2009 Jun;9(6):454-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
8
Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis.成人脊柱侧弯患者手术及非手术治疗后腰背痛的改善情况。
Neurosurgery. 2009 Jul;65(1):86-93; discussion 93-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000347005.35282.6C.
9
Clinical outcomes in older patients after posterolateral lumbar fusion.老年患者腰椎后外侧融合术后的临床疗效
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):547-51. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.11.003. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
10
Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.脊柱手术结果评估:不同结局测量方法间的变化不一致。
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.12.027. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Stiffness-related disability following long segmental posterior instrumentation and fusion: is it influenced by postoperative spinopelvic alignment?长节段后路内固定融合术后与僵硬相关的残疾:是否受术后脊柱骨盆对线的影响?
Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3552-3558. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08414-3. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
Perceived a community with shared future for doctor-patient and benefit finding: a moderated mediation model.医患共益的共同未来感知:一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Psychol. 2023 May 30;11(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01175-6.
3
Does Clinical Photography Influence Satisfaction With Surgery in Adult Patients Operated on for Spinal Deformity?
临床摄影是否会影响接受脊柱畸形手术的成年患者对手术的满意度?
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;14(6):1037-1042. doi: 10.14444/7155. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
4
External validation of a prediction model for pain and functional outcome after elective lumbar spinal fusion.择期腰椎融合术后疼痛和功能结局预测模型的外部验证。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Feb;29(2):374-383. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06189-6. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
5
Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data.退行性腰椎脊柱手术的随访-PROMs 在 1 年后趋于稳定:基于 Swespine 数据的等效性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):2187-2197. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05989-0. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
Functional outcome of non-surgical and surgical management for de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a mean follow-up of 10 years.初发性退行性腰椎侧凸非手术及手术治疗的功能结局:平均10年随访
Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017 Dec 5;12:35. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0143-x. eCollection 2017.
7
How does patient-rated outcome change over time following the surgical treatment of degenerative disorders of the thoracolumbar spine?在胸腰椎退行性疾病接受手术治疗后,患者自评结果随时间如何变化?
Eur Spine J. 2018 Mar;27(3):700-708. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5358-2. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
An observational study on surgically treated adult idiopathic scoliosis patients' quality of life outcomes at 1- and 2-year follow-ups and comparison to controls.一项关于手术治疗的成人特发性脊柱侧凸患者在1年和2年随访时生活质量结果以及与对照组比较的观察性研究。
Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017 Apr 12;12:11. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0118-y. eCollection 2017.
9
Evidence and practice in spine registries.脊柱登记处的证据与实践。
Acta Orthop. 2015;86(5):534-44. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1043174.
10
Adult degenerative scoliosis: comparison of patient-rated outcome after three different surgical treatments.成人退变性脊柱侧凸:三种不同手术治疗后患者自评结果的比较
Eur Spine J. 2016 Aug;25(8):2649-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3484-7. Epub 2014 Aug 8.