• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在胸腰椎退行性疾病接受手术治疗后,患者自评结果随时间如何变化?

How does patient-rated outcome change over time following the surgical treatment of degenerative disorders of the thoracolumbar spine?

作者信息

Fekete Tamas F, Loibl M, Jeszenszky D, Haschtmann D, Banczerowski P, Kleinstück F S, Becker H J, Porchet F, Mannion A F

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.

National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2018 Mar;27(3):700-708. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5358-2. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-017-5358-2
PMID:29080002
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patient-rated measures are considered the gold standard for assessing the outcome of spine surgery, but there is no consensus on the appropriate timing of follow-up. Journals often demand a minimum 2-year follow-up, but the indiscriminate application of this principle may not be warranted. We examined the course of change in patient outcomes up to 5 years after surgery for degenerative spinal disorders.

METHODS

The data were evaluated from 4287 consecutive patients (2287 women, 2000 men; aged 62 ± 15 years) with degenerative disorders of the thoracolumbar spine, undergoing first-time surgery at the given level between 01/01/2005 and 31/12/2011. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI; scored 0-10) was completed by 4012 (94%) patients preoperatively, 4008 (93%) at 3-month follow-up, 3897 (91%) at 1-year follow-up, 3736 (87%) at 2-year follow-up, and 3387 (79%) at 5-year follow-up. 2959 (69%) completed the COMI at all five time-points.

RESULTS

The individual COMI change scores from preoperatively to the various follow-up time-points showed significant correlations ranging from r = 0.50 (for change scores at the earliest vs the latest follow-up) to r = 0.75 (for change scores after 12- vs 24-month follow-up). Concordance with respect to whether the minimum clinically important change score was achieved at consecutive time-points was also good (70-82%). COMI decreased significantly (p < 0.05) from preop to 3 months (by 3.6 ± 2.8 points) and from 3 to 12 months (by 0.3 ± 2.4 points), then levelled off up to 5 years (0.04-0.05 point change; p > 0.05). The course of change up to 12 months differed slightly (p < 0.05) depending on pathology/whether fusion was carried out. For patients undergoing simple decompression, 3-month follow-up was sufficient; those undergoing fusion continued to show further slight but significant change up to 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Stable group mean COMI scores were observed for all patients from 12 months postoperatively onwards. The early postoperative results appeared to herald the longer term outcome. As such, a 'wait and see policy' in patients with a poor initial outcome at 3 months is not advocated. The insistence on a 2-year follow-up could result in a failure to intervene early to achieve better long-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

患者自评指标被视为评估脊柱手术疗效的金标准,但对于合适的随访时机尚无共识。期刊通常要求至少2年的随访,但不加区分地应用这一原则可能并不合理。我们研究了退行性脊柱疾病患者术后长达5年的疗效变化过程。

方法

对4287例连续患者(2287例女性,2000例男性;年龄62±15岁)的数据进行评估,这些患者患有胸腰椎退行性疾病,于2005年1月1日至2011年12月31日在特定节段接受首次手术。4012例(94%)患者在术前完成了核心结局指标指数(COMI;评分0 - 10),3个月随访时为4008例(93%),1年随访时为3897例(91%),2年随访时为3736例(87%),5年随访时为3387例(79%)。2959例(69%)在所有五个时间点均完成了COMI。

结果

从术前到各个随访时间点的个体COMI变化评分显示出显著相关性,范围从r = 0.50(最早与最晚随访时的变化评分)到r = 0.75(12个月与24个月随访后的变化评分)。在连续时间点是否达到最小临床重要变化评分方面的一致性也良好(70 - 82%)。COMI从术前到3个月显著降低(p < 0.05)(降低3.6±2.8分),从3个月到12个月降低(0.3±2.4分),然后直至5年保持平稳(变化0.04 - 0.05分;p > 0.05)。根据病理情况/是否进行融合,长达12个月的变化过程略有不同(p < 0.05)。对于接受单纯减压的患者,3个月随访就足够了;接受融合手术的患者在长达12个月时仍继续显示出进一步的轻微但显著的变化。

结论

术后12个月起观察到所有患者的组平均COMI评分稳定。术后早期结果似乎预示着长期结局。因此,不提倡对3个月时初始结局较差的患者采取“观望政策”。坚持2年随访可能导致无法早期干预以获得更好的长期结局。

相似文献

1
How does patient-rated outcome change over time following the surgical treatment of degenerative disorders of the thoracolumbar spine?在胸腰椎退行性疾病接受手术治疗后,患者自评结果随时间如何变化?
Eur Spine J. 2018 Mar;27(3):700-708. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5358-2. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
2
Patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis.腰椎硬膜外脂肪增多症手术治疗的患者报告结局
Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1333-1341. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
3
A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated and radiographic outcome after 2 types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.两种减压融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的患者自评和影像学疗效比较研究:前路颈椎间盘切除与椎体次全切除。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.FOCUS1396.
4
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
5
Influence of previous surgery on patient-rated outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.既往手术对腰椎退行性疾病手术后患者自评结果的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Aug;25(8):2553-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4383-x. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
6
Assessment of outcome in patients undergoing surgery for intradural spinal tumor using the multidimensional patient-rated Core Outcome Measures Index and the modified McCormick Scale.使用多维患者自评核心结局指标指数和改良麦考密克量表评估硬膜内脊髓肿瘤手术患者的结局。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Aug;39(2):E2. doi: 10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15163.
7
Patient-reported outcomes unbiased by length of follow-up after lumbar degenerative spine surgery: Do we need 2 years of follow-up?腰椎退行性脊柱手术后随访时间长短不影响患者报告的结局:我们是否需要 2 年的随访?
Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):637-644. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study.确定腰椎退行性疾病手术患者中相当于“满意症状状态”的奥斯威斯利残疾指数评分——一项基于脊柱探戈注册研究
Spine J. 2016 Oct;16(10):1221-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
9
Adult thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis treated with long vertebral fusion to the sacropelvis: a comparison between new hybrid selective spinal fusion versus anterior-posterior spinal instrumentation.采用长节段椎体融合至骶骨盆治疗成人胸腰段和腰椎脊柱侧弯:新型混合选择性脊柱融合术与前后路脊柱内固定术的比较
Spine J. 2014 Apr;14(4):637-45. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.090. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
10
Surgical training in spine surgery: safety and patient-rated outcome.脊柱外科手术培训:安全性和患者评定结果。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):807-816. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05883-9. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) comes of age: 18 years of efficient and effective patient-reported outcome measurement in the field of spinal disorders. Part 1. Development of the COMI, interpretation of scores, and use in research.核心结局指标指数(COMI)步入成年:脊柱疾病领域18年高效且有效的患者报告结局测量。第1部分。COMI的发展、分数解读及在研究中的应用。
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08835-8.
2
How reliable are the Core Outcome Measures Index and Global Treatment Outcome as measures of treatment success after surgery for central lumbar spinal canal stenosis?作为腰椎中央管狭窄症手术后治疗成功的衡量指标,核心结局指标指数和总体治疗结局的可靠性如何?
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08894-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.腰椎手术后3个月的奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数结果不足以评估个体患者的长期体验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):170-80. doi: 10.3171/2015.11.SPINE15872. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
2
Influence of previous surgery on patient-rated outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.既往手术对腰椎退行性疾病手术后患者自评结果的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Aug;25(8):2553-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4383-x. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Can 3-month models or observed 3- or 6-month patient-reported outcome measures accurately predict 12-month disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery?
3个月的模型或观察到的3个月或6个月患者报告的结局指标能否准确预测腰椎减压术后12个月的残疾和疼痛情况?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 24;145(1):260. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05877-x.
4
Comparison between microendoscopic laminectomy and open posterior decompression surgery for two-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.两种二节段腰椎管狭窄症减压手术方式的比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Nov 25;25(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08090-w.
5
Sex Differences in Patient-Rated Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study.退行性疾病腰椎融合术后患者自评结果的性别差异:一项多中心队列研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jul 1;50(13):924-931. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005183. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
6
Evaluation of "appropriate use criteria" for surgical decision-making in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. A controlled, multicentre, prospective observational study.评价腰椎退变性脊椎滑脱症手术决策的“适宜医疗标准”。一项对照、多中心、前瞻性观察研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 May;33(5):1773-1785. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08157-1. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
7
Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery: A systematic review.脊柱手术中患者报告的结局指标:一项系统评价。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):378-389. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_101_22. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
8
Does loss to follow-up lead to an overestimation of treatment success? Findings from a spine surgery registry of over 15,000 patients.失访是否会导致治疗成功率的高估?来自超过 15000 名患者的脊柱手术登记处的发现。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):813-823. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07541-7. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
9
Onset of mental disorders in patients who developed failed back surgery syndrome.出现精神障碍的患者谁开发了失败的背部手术综合征。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Oct;31(10):2612-2618. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07334-4. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
10
Development of a machine-learning based model for predicting multidimensional outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the spine.基于机器学习的方法预测退行性脊柱疾病术后多维结局的模型构建。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Aug;31(8):2125-2136. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07306-8. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
腰椎手术后1年的手术效果指标能否准确预测2年的预后?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):689-696. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15476. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
4
Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?脊柱手术后3个月患者报告的结局:在真实世界注册平台中,它是12个月结局的准确预测指标吗?
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E17. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15356.
5
Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery.性别对脊柱手术中以患者为导向的结局的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):235-246. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4062-3. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
6
Dynamics of improvement following total lumbar disc replacement: is the outcome predictable?全腰椎间盘置换术后改善的动力学:结果可预测吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2579-86. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b612bd.
7
Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.腰椎退行性滑脱症手术治疗与非手术治疗的比较:脊柱患者预后研究试验(SPORT)随机分组及观察队列的四年结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jun;91(6):1295-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00913.
8
Benchmarking with Spine Tango: potentials and pitfalls.与脊柱探戈进行基准测试:潜力与陷阱。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):305-11. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0943-7. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
9
The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice.从患者角度看脊柱手术的质量。第1部分:临床实践中的核心结局指标指数
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):367-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0942-8. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
10
The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.从患者角度看脊柱手术的质量:第2部分。用核心结局指标指数衡量改善和恶化的最小临床重要差异
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y. Epub 2009 Mar 19.