• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非酸性反流在NERD中的作用:来自150例停止治疗患者的阻抗- pH监测的经验教训。

The role of nonacid reflux in NERD: lessons learned from impedance-pH monitoring in 150 patients off therapy.

作者信息

Savarino Edoardo, Zentilin Patrizia, Tutuian Radu, Pohl Daniel, Casa Domenico D, Frazzoni Marzio, Cestari Renzo, Savarino Vincenzo

机构信息

Di.M.I. Cattedra di Gastroenterologia, Università di Genova, Genova, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2685-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02119.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02119.x
PMID:18775017
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is the most common form of gastroesophageal reflux disease. While the role of acid reflux has been established, the relevance of nonacid reflux in generating symptoms in NERD is unknown.

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of impedance-pH monitoring in NERD patients.

METHODS

Patients with typical reflux symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation) and normal endoscopy (NERD) underwent a combined impedance-pH monitoring off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Previously investigated 48 healthy volunteers served as controls. Distal esophageal acid exposure (% time pH < 4), number of acid and nonacid reflux episodes, 2-min window symptom index (SI; positive if > or = 50%), and symptom association probability (SAP; positive if > or = 95%) were calculated.

RESULTS

Between June 2004 and June 2007, 150 NERD patients (82 women, mean age 48 yr, range 18-78 yr) reported symptoms during the impedance-pH monitoring. NERD patients had more reflux episodes (median [25th-75th percentile]) compared with healthy volunteers (total: 46 [26-65] vs 32 [18-43], P < 0.05; acid: 29 [14-43] vs 17 [8.5-31.0], P < 0.05; and nonacid: 20 [15-27] vs 18 [13.5-26.0], P = NS). Sixty-three (42%) patients had abnormal % time pH < 4. Among 87 patients with normal % time pH < 4., 22 (15%) had a positive SAP for acid, 19 (12%) for nonacid reflux, and 7 (5%) for both. Classifying patients with symptomatic nonacid reflux as having a hypersensitive esophagus reduced the number of patients with functional heartburn from 65 (43%) to 39 (26%).

CONCLUSION

Monitoring for nonacid reflux in NERD patients reduces the proportion of patients classified as having "functional heartburn." Studies assessing the clinical implications of these findings are warranted.

摘要

引言

非糜烂性反流病(NERD)是胃食管反流病最常见的形式。虽然酸反流的作用已得到证实,但非酸反流在NERD症状产生中的相关性尚不清楚。

目的

评估阻抗-pH监测在NERD患者中的诊断效用。

方法

有典型反流症状(烧心和/或反流)且内镜检查正常(NERD)的患者在停用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗后进行联合阻抗-pH监测。先前研究的48名健康志愿者作为对照。计算食管远端酸暴露(pH<4的时间百分比)、酸和非酸反流发作次数、2分钟窗口症状指数(SI;若≥50%则为阳性)以及症状关联概率(SAP;若≥95%则为阳性)。

结果

2004年6月至2007年6月期间,150例NERD患者(82名女性,平均年龄48岁,范围18 - 78岁)在阻抗-pH监测期间报告有症状。与健康志愿者相比,NERD患者有更多的反流发作(中位数[第25 - 75百分位数])(总计:46[26 - 65]对32[18 - 43],P<0.05;酸反流:29[14 - 43]对17[8.5 - 31.0],P<0.05;非酸反流:20[15 - 27]对18[13.5 - 26.0],P =无显著差异)。63例(42%)患者的pH<4时间百分比异常。在87例pH<4时间百分比正常的患者中,22例(15%)酸反流的SAP为阳性,19例(12%)非酸反流的SAP为阳性,7例(5%)两者均为阳性。将有症状性非酸反流的患者归类为食管过敏,使功能性烧心患者的数量从65例(43%)减少至39例(26%)。

结论

监测NERD患者的非酸反流可减少被归类为“功能性烧心”的患者比例。有必要开展评估这些发现临床意义的研究。

相似文献

1
The role of nonacid reflux in NERD: lessons learned from impedance-pH monitoring in 150 patients off therapy.非酸性反流在NERD中的作用:来自150例停止治疗患者的阻抗- pH监测的经验教训。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2685-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02119.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
2
Characteristics of reflux episodes and symptom association in patients with erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease: study using combined impedance-pH off therapy.使用联合阻抗-pH 停治疗研究食管糜烂性食管炎和非糜烂性反流病患者的反流事件特征和症状相关性。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;105(5):1053-61. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.670. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
3
Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy.胃食管反流病患者食管pH值-阻抗监测及症状分析:治疗期间与非治疗期间的研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):1956-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00711.x. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
4
Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with therapy-resistant reflux symptoms: 'on' or 'off' proton pump inhibitor?对难治性反流症状患者进行食管pH阻抗监测:质子泵抑制剂是“服用”还是“停用”?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct;103(10):2446-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02033.x. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
5
[Non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Incidence of clinical forms, characteristics of esophageal exposure to acid and symptomatic correlations].[非糜烂性胃食管反流病。临床类型的发生率、食管酸暴露特征及症状相关性]
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2003 Apr-Jun;68(2):113-9.
6
The added value of impedance-pH monitoring to Rome III criteria in distinguishing functional heartburn from non-erosive reflux disease.阻抗-pH 监测对罗马 III 标准在区分功能性烧心和非糜烂性反流病中的附加价值。
Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Jul;43(7):542-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
7
Stratification and symptom characteristics of non-erosive reflux disease based on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux.基于酸和十二指肠-胃食管反流的非糜烂性反流病的分层及症状特征
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Feb;23(2):290-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05152.x. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
8
Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.健康早产儿24小时食管阻抗-pH监测:酸、弱酸性和弱碱性胃食管反流的发生率及特征
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e299-308. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3140. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
9
[Perception of symptoms with minimal reductions of esophageal pH in patients with erosive and non-erosive GERD].[糜烂性和非糜烂性胃食管反流病患者食管pH值轻度降低时的症状感知]
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2004 Jan-Mar;69(1):30-6.
10
Comparison of reflux frequency during prolonged multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring on and off acid suppression therapy.比较抑酸治疗时和停用时延长多通道腔内阻抗和 pH 监测的反流频率。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;43(9):816-20. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318194592b.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病的病理生理学
Digestion. 2025 Jun 25:1-17. doi: 10.1159/000547023.
2
pH Impedance Monitoring on Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy Impacts Management Decisions in Proven GERD but not in Unproven GERD.质子泵抑制剂治疗期间的pH阻抗监测对已确诊胃食管反流病(GERD)的管理决策有影响,但对未确诊GERD则无影响。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.02.032.
3
The Contemporary Diagnostic Approaches to Esophageal Symptomatology.食管症状学的当代诊断方法
Cureus. 2025 Feb 10;17(2):e78804. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78804. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Is reflux hypersensitivity truly a functional gastrointestinal disorder? A retrospective cross-sectional study.反流高敏反应真的是一种功能性胃肠病吗?一项回顾性横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0316226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316226. eCollection 2025.
5
International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus consensus on management of the failed fundoplication.国际食管疾病学会关于胃底折叠术失败的管理共识。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Nov 28;37(12). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae090.
6
Pilot study on anti-reflux mucoplasty: Advancing endoscopic anti-reflux therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.抗反流黏膜成形术的初步研究:推进内镜下胃食管反流病抗反流治疗
Dig Endosc. 2024 Jun;36(6):690-698. doi: 10.1111/den.14711. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
7
Esophageal Reflux Hypersensitivity: A Comprehensive Review.食管反流过度敏感:全面综述。
Gut Liver. 2023 Nov 15;17(6):831-842. doi: 10.5009/gnl220373. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
8
The Lyon Consensus Criteria for GERD Diagnosis in a Greek Population: The Clinical Impact and Changes in GERD Diagnosis in a Real-World, Retrospective Study.希腊人群中GERD诊断的里昂共识标准:一项真实世界回顾性研究中GERD诊断的临床影响及变化
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 14;11(18):5383. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185383.
9
Clinical use of mean nocturnal baseline impedance and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index for the diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease.用于诊断胃食管反流病的夜间平均基础阻抗和反流后吞咽诱导蠕动波指数的临床应用。
Esophagus. 2022 Oct;19(4):525-534. doi: 10.1007/s10388-022-00933-6. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
10
Recent insights on functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity.关于功能性烧心和反流过敏的最新见解。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;38(4):417-422. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000846.