Hood Korey K
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Behavioral Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7039, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Apr;34(3):294-303. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn090. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
To test the depression-distortion hypothesis in pediatric type 1 diabetes.
In a sample of 187 youth with type 1 diabetes, caregivers completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale and the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI): parent proxy report. Youth completed the CDI. To test whether caregiver depressive symptoms (CES-D) moderated the proxy report of youth depressive symptoms (CDI:P), the CDI, CES-D, and their interactions were entered as predictors in to a regression analysis.
The regression was significant, F (8,178) = 9.26, p <.0001, R(2) =.29, and all three variables were significant predictors. Post-hoc probing of the interaction showed that caregivers with high CES-D scores reported high levels of youth depressive symptoms at both high and low levels of youth-reported depressive symptoms. In contrast, caregivers with low CES-D scores reported similar levels as the youth.
These results support the depression-distortion hypothesis in a pediatric chronic disease sample.
检验儿童1型糖尿病中的抑郁-失真假说。
在187名1型糖尿病青少年样本中,照料者完成了流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)和儿童抑郁量表(CDI):家长代理报告。青少年完成了CDI。为了检验照料者的抑郁症状(CES-D)是否调节了青少年抑郁症状的代理报告(CDI:P),将CDI、CES-D及其交互项作为预测变量纳入回归分析。
回归显著,F(8,178)=9.26,p<.0001,R²=.29,且所有三个变量都是显著的预测变量。对交互项的事后探究表明,CES-D得分高的照料者在青少年报告的抑郁症状水平高和低时,都报告青少年有高水平的抑郁症状。相比之下,CES-D得分低的照料者报告的水平与青少年相似。
这些结果支持了儿科慢性病样本中的抑郁-失真假说。