Kongkaew Chuenjid, Jampachaisri Katechan, Chaturongkul Chollapat A, Scholfield C Norman
Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Feb;173(2):203-12. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2128-y.
Depression compromises diabetes treatment in juveniles, and this study aimed to identify influential targets most likely to improve adherence to treatment and glycemic control. Prospective observational studies investigating associations between depression and treatment adherence in juveniles with type 1 diabetes were extracted from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central. Nineteen studies comprising 2,935 juveniles met our criteria. Median effect sizes between depression and treatment adherence were 0.22 (interquartile range (IQR), 0.16–0.35) by patient and 0.13 (IQR, 0.12–0.24) caregiver report. Corresponding values for depression/glycemic control were 0.16 (IQR, 0.09– 0.23) and 0.08 (IQR, 0.04–0.14), respectively. Effect sizes varied with study design, publication year and assessment tools: CES-D yielded a higher effect size than other assessment tools for depression, where associations for depression and either adherence or glycemic control was investigated. Several behaviours influenced adherence and glycemic control.
This study showed moderate associations between depression and poor treatment adherence. Targeting behaviour and social environments, however, may ultimately provide more cost-effective health gains than targeting depressive symptoms.
抑郁症会影响青少年糖尿病的治疗,本研究旨在确定最有可能改善治疗依从性和血糖控制的影响因素。从MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO和Cochrane Central中提取了调查1型糖尿病青少年抑郁症与治疗依从性之间关联的前瞻性观察性研究。19项研究共纳入2935名青少年,符合我们的标准。患者报告显示,抑郁症与治疗依从性之间的效应量中位数为0.22(四分位间距[IQR],0.16 - 0.35),照顾者报告为0.13(IQR,0.12 - 0.24)。抑郁症与血糖控制的相应值分别为0.16(IQR,0.09 - 0.23)和0.08(IQR,0.04 - 0.14)。效应量因研究设计、发表年份和评估工具而异:在调查抑郁症与依从性或血糖控制之间关联时,CES - D产生的效应量高于其他抑郁症评估工具。几种行为影响了依从性和血糖控制。
本研究表明抑郁症与治疗依从性差之间存在中度关联。然而,针对行为和社会环境进行干预,可能最终比针对抑郁症状能带来更具成本效益的健康收益。