Krishnan Kannan, Carrier Richard
GRIS/DSEST, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2008 Jul-Sep;26(3):300-16. doi: 10.1080/10590500802343974.
In establishing the guideline values for chemical contaminants in drinking water, the contribution of inhalation and dermal routes associated with showering/bathing needs to be evaluated. The present article reviews the current approaches available for evaluating the importance of inhalation and dermal routes of exposure to drinking water contaminants (DWCs) and integrates them within a 2-tier approach. Accordingly, tier 1 would evaluate whether the dermal or inhalation route is likely to contribute to at least 10% of the dose received from ingestion of drinking water (i.e., 0.15 L-equivalent per day based on the daily water intake rate of 1.5 L/day typically used in Health Canada assessments). Based on the route-specific exposure parameters (i.e., area of skin exposed, effective skin permeability coefficient [K(p)], and air to water concentration ratio during use conditions [F(air-water)], breathing rate, duration of contact, and fraction absorbed), it was determined that for DWCs with K(p) less than 0.024 cm/hr and F(air - water) less than 0.0063, the dermal and inhalation routes during showering or bathing are unlikely to contribute significantly to the total dose. For DWCs with K(p) value equal to or greater than 0.025 cm/hr, dermal notation is implied, and as such, tier 2 calculation of L-equivalent associated with dermal exposure needs to be performed. Similarly, for DWCs with F(air-water) greater than 0.00063, inhalation notation is implied, and detailed evaluation of the L-equivalent associated with inhalation exposure (i.e., tier 2) is suggested. In general, data from human volunteer studies, observational measurements, and targeted modeling studies are useful for deriving L-equivalents, reflective of the magnitude of dose received via dermal and inhalation routes relative to the oral route. However, in resource-limited situations, these approaches can be integrated within a 2-tier approach for prioritizing and providing quantitative evaluations of the relevance of dermal and inhalation routes for developing exposure guidelines for DWCs.
在制定饮用水中化学污染物的指导值时,需要评估与淋浴/沐浴相关的吸入和皮肤接触途径的贡献。本文综述了目前可用于评估饮用水污染物(DWCs)吸入和皮肤接触途径重要性的方法,并将其整合到一个两级方法中。因此,第一层将评估皮肤或吸入途径是否可能对从饮用水摄入中获得的剂量贡献至少10%(即,根据加拿大卫生部评估中通常使用的每日1.5升/天的水摄入量,相当于每天0.15升)。根据特定途径的暴露参数(即暴露的皮肤面积、有效皮肤渗透系数[K(p)]以及使用条件下的气水浓度比[F(气-水)]、呼吸速率、接触持续时间和吸收分数),确定对于K(p)小于0.024厘米/小时且F(气-水)小于0.0063的DWCs,淋浴或沐浴期间的皮肤和吸入途径不太可能对总剂量有显著贡献。对于K(p)值等于或大于0.025厘米/小时的DWCs,意味着皮肤接触,因此需要进行与皮肤暴露相关的L当量的第二层计算。同样,对于F(气-水)大于0.00063的DWCs,意味着吸入接触,建议对与吸入暴露相关的L当量进行详细评估(即第二层)。一般来说,来自人体志愿者研究、观察性测量和针对性建模研究的数据对于得出L当量很有用,L当量反映了通过皮肤和吸入途径相对于口服途径获得的剂量大小。然而,在资源有限的情况下,这些方法可以整合到一个两级方法中,用于对皮肤和吸入途径在制定DWCs暴露指南中的相关性进行优先排序和提供定量评估。