Koskela Heikki O, Purokivi Minna K, Tukiainen Raija M
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, P, O, Box 1777, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Cough. 2008 Sep 9;4:8. doi: 10.1186/1745-9974-4-8.
The coughs occurring during cough provocation tests are usually counted at the same time when the test is being conducted, i.e., simultaneously. It is unknown whether cough counting from video recording might increase the accuracy of the cough counting. During recent years, cough challenges with hypertonic aerosols have been introduced. They often provoke very frequent coughing which may complicate the simultaneous cough counting.
To assess whether cough counting from video recording is superior to simultaneous cough counting in two different hypertonic cough challenges.
The analysis includes 82 hypertonic saline challenges performed on 66 subjects, providing 1984 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video cough counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the osmolality to provoke 15 cumulative coughs (CUM15). The analysis also includes 136 hypertonic histamine challenges performed on 114 subjects providing 5373 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the cumulative number of coughs divided by the final histamine concentration administered (CCR). This challenge involved several additional measurements to cough counting.
For the saline challenge, the mean difference between the counting types was 0.0 coughs per minute with 95% limits of agreement of -1.2 to 1.2 coughs per minute. For the hypertonic histamine challenge the respective figures were 0.3 (-1.9 to 2.5) coughs per minute. At high coughing frequency the video counts tended to outnumber the simultaneous counts. The counting type had no effect on the hypertonic saline CUM15 and only a marginal effect on its repeatability. On the contrary, video counting resulted to significantly higher hypertonic histamine CCR values than simultaneous counting (p < 0.001).
The agreement between simultaneous and video counting of coughs is generally good. However, as the coughing frequency increases, simultaneous counting may miss coughs, especially if the nurse has to share his/her attention to several activities simultaneously. Video recording is advisable for the hypertonic histamine challenge but unnecessary for the hypertonic saline challenge. To ensure reliable simultaneous cough counting, cough provocation tests should be performed in a quiet environment, applying as little unnecessary equipment and measurements as possible.
咳嗽激发试验期间的咳嗽计数通常在试验进行时同步进行。尚不清楚通过视频记录进行咳嗽计数是否会提高咳嗽计数的准确性。近年来,已经引入了高渗气雾剂咳嗽激发试验。它们常常引发非常频繁的咳嗽,这可能使同步咳嗽计数变得复杂。
评估在两种不同的高渗咳嗽激发试验中,通过视频记录进行咳嗽计数是否优于同步咳嗽计数。
分析包括对66名受试者进行的82次高渗盐水激发试验,提供了1984分钟的观察时间,同时进行了同步和视频咳嗽计数。咳嗽敏感性以诱发15次累积咳嗽(CUM15)的渗透压表示。分析还包括对114名受试者进行的136次高渗组胺激发试验,提供了5373分钟的观察时间,同时进行了同步和视频计数。咳嗽敏感性以咳嗽累积次数除以最终给予的组胺浓度(CCR)表示。该激发试验涉及咳嗽计数之外的几项额外测量。
对于盐水激发试验,两种计数类型之间的平均差异为每分钟0次咳嗽,95%一致性界限为每分钟-1.2至1.2次咳嗽。对于高渗组胺激发试验,相应的数据为每分钟0.3次咳嗽(-1.9至2.5次)。在高咳嗽频率时,视频计数往往多于同步计数。计数类型对高渗盐水CUM15没有影响,对其重复性只有轻微影响。相反,视频计数导致高渗组胺CCR值显著高于同步计数(p<0.001)。
咳嗽的同步计数和视频计数之间的一致性总体良好。然而,随着咳嗽频率增加,同步计数可能会漏计咳嗽,尤其是当护士必须同时关注多项活动时。对于高渗组胺激发试验,建议进行视频记录,但对于高渗盐水激发试验则不必要。为确保可靠的同步咳嗽计数,咳嗽激发试验应在安静环境中进行,尽量减少不必要的设备和测量。