Stavem Knut, Røgeberg Ole Jørgen, Olsen Jan Abel, Boe Jacob
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medical Division, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Addiction. 2008 Sep;103(9):1441-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02278.x.
To compare the properties of four measures of dependence to nicotine/tobacco, the 12-item Cigarette Dependence Scale (CDS-12), the six-item Fagerström Test of Nicotine Dependence (FTND) and two shorter versions of the same measures.
In a cross-sectional telephone survey of smokers in a representative general population sample in Norway, we compared the measures. We assessed (i) internal consistency reliability with Cronbach's alpha; (ii) compared item scores; and (iii) tested the validity of the questionnaires. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a smaller convenience sample.
Among 1265 respondents (64%), 290 (23%) were daily smokers and included in further analysis. Their mean age was 42 years [standard deviation (SD) 15] and 46% were female. They smoked on average 13 cigarettes per day (SD 6). Internal consistency reliability was 0.61 for the FTND (n = 267) and 0.81 for the CDS-12 (n = 266). Score distributions suggested a floor effect for the FTND. Test-retest reliability was 0.90 for the FTND and 0.97 for the CDS-12 (n = 31). The correlation between the scale scores and a question about the maximum willingness to pay for a cigarette after not smoking all day was 0.36 (P < 0.001) for the FTND (n = 262) and 0.45 (P < 0.001) for the CDS-12 (n = 263). There was little difference in the associations of the two scales or their abbreviated versions with external variables.
Telephone administration was acceptable for both questionnaires, and we have established population reference values for the four scales. The questionnaires were associated with each other and showed similar properties. The findings support the construct validity of the scales.
比较四种尼古丁/烟草依赖测量方法的特性,即12项香烟依赖量表(CDS - 12)、6项尼古丁依赖Fagerström测试(FTND)以及这两种测量方法的两个较短版本。
在挪威具有代表性的普通人群样本中对吸烟者进行横断面电话调查,我们比较了这些测量方法。我们评估了:(i)使用Cronbach's alpha系数评估内部一致性信度;(ii)比较项目得分;(iii)测试问卷的效度。在一个较小的便利样本中评估重测信度。
在1265名受访者(64%)中,290名(23%)为每日吸烟者并纳入进一步分析。他们的平均年龄为42岁[标准差(SD)15],46%为女性。他们平均每天吸烟13支(SD 6)。FTND(n = 267)的内部一致性信度为0.61,CDS - 12(n = 266)的内部一致性信度为0.81。得分分布表明FTND存在地板效应。FTND的重测信度为0.90,CDS - 12的重测信度为0.97(n = 31)。对于FTND(n = 262),量表得分与关于一整天不吸烟后购买一支香烟的最大支付意愿问题之间的相关性为0.36(P < 0.001),对于CDS - 12(n = 263)为0.45(P < 0.001)。两种量表及其缩写版本与外部变量的关联几乎没有差异。
两种问卷通过电话进行管理都是可以接受的,并且我们已经建立了这四种量表的人群参考值。这些问卷相互关联且表现出相似的特性。研究结果支持了量表的结构效度。