University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Mar 1;107(2-3):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.09.011.
To determine whether the long and short versions of the Cigarette Dependence Scale (CDS), the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) and the Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale (NDSS) predicted smoking abstinence.
We collected data via Internet in 2004-2007 in 2343 current smokers. Follow-up surveys were conducted after 8 days (N=456) and 31 days (N=486). We assessed the ability of dependence ratings to predict smoking abstinence, controlling for confidence and intention to quit smoking.
All dependence scales were significant predictors of smoking abstinence at the 8-day follow-up, with the CDS being the best predictor (OR: 3.98 per SD unit, 15% of variance explained). Results were similar but stronger among respondents intending to quit (OR: 6.68, 26% of variance explained). At the 31-day follow-up, only the FTND, HSI and NDSS Continuity subscale were still significant, albeit weak, predictors of abstinence (OR: 1.56, 2% of variance explained).
Among the scales under scrutiny, the CDS had the best predictive validity after 8 days. None of the scales explained more than 2% of the variance in abstinence after 31 days.
为了确定香烟依赖量表（CDS）的长短版本、尼古丁依赖 Fagerström 测试（FTND）、吸烟严重程度指数（HSI）和尼古丁依赖综合征量表（NDSS）是否能预测戒烟情况。
我们于 2004-2007 年通过互联网收集了 2343 名当前吸烟者的数据。在 8 天（N=456）和 31 天（N=486）后进行了随访调查。我们评估了依赖评分预测戒烟的能力，同时控制了戒烟信心和意图。
所有依赖量表在 8 天随访时都是戒烟的显著预测因子，CDS 是最佳预测因子（OR：每标准差单位 3.98，解释了 15%的方差）。在有戒烟意图的受访者中，结果类似但更显著（OR：6.68，解释了 26%的方差）。在 31 天随访时，只有 FTND、HSI 和 NDSS 连续性子量表仍然是戒烟的显著但较弱的预测因子（OR：1.56，解释了 2%的方差）。
在所研究的量表中，CDS 在 8 天后具有最佳的预测效度。在 31 天后，没有任何一个量表能解释超过 2%的戒烟方差。
