Suppr超能文献

比较香烟依赖量表和尼古丁依赖的法格斯特龙测试的有效性。

Comparing the validity of the Cigarette Dependence Scale and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence.

作者信息

Etter Jean-François

机构信息

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Geneva, CMU, 1 rue Michel-Servet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 May 1;95(1-2):152-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.017. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared the validity of the Cigarette Dependence Scale (CDS-12) and of the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) in daily cigarette smokers.

METHODS

Internet survey in 2004-2007. Eight days and 6 weeks after answering these two dependence questionnaires, participants indicated their smoking status and answered the Cigarette Withdrawal Scale and the Smoking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. We used the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) to assess nicotine dependence as defined in DSM-IV.

RESULTS

There were 13,697 participants at baseline, 1113 (8%) after 8 days and 435 (3%) after 6 weeks. CDS-12, but not FTND, predicted smoking cessation after 8 days (odds ratio=1.20 per standard deviation unit, p=0.03) and 6 weeks (odds ratio=1.34, p=0.01). In participants who had quit smoking after 8 days, CDS-12 was a better predictor of craving (beta=0.30, p<0.001), than FTND (beta=0.14, p<0.01). After 8 days, self-efficacy in quitters was predicted by CDS-12 (beta=-0.16, p=0.02), but not by FTND (beta=-0.05, p=0.3). CDS-12 was more strongly associated than FTND with DSM-defined dependence measured by MINI: area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve=0.72 (95% confidence interval=0.70-0.73). For FTND, the area under ROC=0.64 (0.63-0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

CDS-12 performed better than FTND on tests of predictive and construct validity.

摘要

背景

我们比较了香烟依赖量表(CDS - 12)和尼古丁依赖的法格斯特龙测试(FTND)在每日吸烟者中的效度。

方法

2004 - 2007年进行网络调查。在回答这两份依赖问卷8天和6周后,参与者表明其吸烟状态,并回答香烟戒断量表和吸烟自我效能量表。我们使用迷你国际神经精神访谈(MINI)来评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM - IV)中定义的尼古丁依赖。

结果

基线时有13697名参与者,8天后有1113名(8%),6周后有435名(3%)。CDS - 12而非FTND能预测8天后(优势比=每标准差单位为1.20,p = 0.03)和6周后(优势比=1.34,p = 0.01)的戒烟情况。在8天后已戒烟的参与者中,CDS - 12比FTND更能预测渴求感(β = 0.30,p < 0.001)(FTND的β = 0.14,p < 0.01)。8天后,CDS - 12能预测戒烟者的自我效能(β = - 0.16,p = 0.02),而FTND不能(β = - 0.05,p = 0.3)。与FTND相比,CDS - 12与通过MINI测量的DSM定义的依赖关联更强:受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积=0.72(95%置信区间=0.70 - 0.73)。对于FTND,ROC曲线下面积=0.64(0.63 - 0.66)。

结论

在预测效度和结构效度测试中,CDS - 12的表现优于FTND。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验