Davis John W, Chang David W, Chevray Pierre, Wang Run, Shen Yu, Wen Sijin, Pettaway Curtis A, Pisters Louis L, Swanson David A, Madsen Lydia T, Huber Nelda, Troncoso Patricia, Babaian R Joseph, Wood Christopher G
Department of Urology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.051. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
Nonrandomized studies of unilateral nerve-sparing (UNS) radical prostatectomy (RP) have reported improved recovery of erectile function if the sacrificed cavernous nerve is reconstructed with a sural nerve graft (SNG).
To determine whether UNS RP plus SNG results in a 50% relative increase in potency at 2 yr compared to UNS RP alone.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study enrolled patients from October 2001-May 2006 from a single academic center and was randomized, open label. Participants were men with localized prostate cancer recommended for UNS RP, less than 66 yr old, normal baseline erectile function, and willing to participate in early erectile dysfunction (ED) therapy. Patients were followed up to 2 yr.
Patients underwent UNS RP and ED therapy starting at 6 wk: oral prostaglandin type-5 (PDE5) inhibitor, vacuum erection device (VED), and intracavernosal injection therapy. In the SNG group, a plastic surgeon performed the procedure at the time of RP.
The ability to have an erection suitable for intercourse with or without a PDE5 inhibitor at 2 yr. The hypothesis was that SNG would result in a 60% potency rate compared to 40% for controls (80% power, 5% two-way significance).
The trial planned to enroll 200 patients, but an interim analysis at 107 patients met criteria for futility and the trial was closed. For patients completing the protocol to 2 yr, potency was recovered in 32 of 45 (71%) of SNG and 14 of 21 (67%) of controls (p=0.777). By intent-to-treat analysis, potency recovered in 32 of 66 (48.5%) of SNG and 14 of 41 (34%) of controls (p=0.271). No differences were seen in time to potency or quality of life scores for ED and urinary function. Limitations included slower-than-expected accrual and poor compliance with ED therapy: <65% for VED and <40% for injections.
The addition of SNG to a UNS RP did not improve potency at 2 yr following surgery.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00080808, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00080808?term=NCT00080808&rank=1.
关于单侧保留神经(UNS)的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的非随机研究报告称,如果用腓肠神经移植(SNG)重建被切断的海绵体神经,勃起功能的恢复会得到改善。
确定与单纯UNS RP相比,UNS RP联合SNG是否能使2年时的性功能恢复率相对提高50%。
设计、地点和参与者:该研究于2001年10月至2006年5月在一个单一学术中心招募患者,为随机、开放标签试验。参与者为推荐接受UNS RP的局限性前列腺癌男性患者,年龄小于66岁,基线勃起功能正常,且愿意参与早期勃起功能障碍(ED)治疗。对患者进行了长达2年的随访。
患者接受UNS RP,并在术后6周开始进行ED治疗:口服5型磷酸二酯酶(PDE5)抑制剂、真空勃起装置(VED)和海绵体内注射治疗。在SNG组,整形外科医生在进行RP手术时实施该操作。
2年时在使用或不使用PDE5抑制剂的情况下实现适合性交勃起的能力。假设是SNG组的性功能恢复率为60%,而对照组为40%(检验效能80%,双侧显著性水平5%)。
该试验计划招募200名患者,但在纳入107名患者时进行的中期分析符合无效标准,试验因此终止。对于完成2年方案的患者,SNG组45名中有32名(71%)恢复了性功能,对照组21名中有14名(67%)恢复了性功能(p = 0.777)。按意向性分析,SNG组66名中有32名(48.5%)恢复了性功能,对照组41名中有14名(34%)恢复了性功能(p = 0.271)。在性功能恢复时间、ED生活质量评分和排尿功能方面未发现差异。局限性包括入组速度慢于预期以及对ED治疗的依从性差:VED治疗的依从率<65%,注射治疗的依从率<40%。
在UNS RP基础上加用SNG并未改善术后2年时的性功能。
ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT00080808,http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00080808?term=NCT00080808&rank=1 。