Suppr超能文献

菲德利斯导线骨折风险加速。

Accelerating risk of Fidelis lead fracture.

作者信息

Farwell David, Green Martin S, Lemery Robert, Gollob Michael H, Birnie David H

机构信息

University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2008 Oct;5(10):1375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.06.024. Epub 2008 Jul 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sprint Fidelis (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) is a 6.6-F implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead. In October 2007 the manufacturer suspended distribution of Sprint Fidelis leads secondary to high early fracture rates. Reprogramming of lead impedance alerts was recommended to try to reduce inappropriate shocks.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to assess how the hazard of Fidelis fracture varies with time, whether lead impedance alert thresholds programmed after recall have prevented inappropriate shocks, and predictors of lead fracture.

METHODS

We collected clinical and device interrogation data on all lead fractures and performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis. We performed a case control study to examine univariate and multivariate predictors of lead fracture.

RESULTS

There have been 17 lead fractures in our cohort of 480 Sprint Fidelis (model 6949) leads, median follow-up 19.8 months. The hazard of fracture increased significantly with time by a power of 2.74 (95% confidence interval: 2.57 to 2.91, P <.0001). Reprogrammed lead impedance thresholds prevented inappropriate shocks in only 1 of 6 patients. Independent predictors of lead fracture were greater left ventricular ejection fraction (P = .0011) and noncephalic venous access (P = .0224).

CONCLUSION

The risk of lead fracture increased with time by a power of 2.74. Reprogrammed lead impedance thresholds prevented inappropriate shocks in only 1 of 6 patients. Independent predictors of lead fracture were greater left ventricular ejection fraction and noncephalic access.

摘要

背景

Sprint Fidelis(美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)是一种6.6F的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线。2007年10月,由于早期骨折率较高,制造商暂停了Sprint Fidelis导线的分发。建议对导线阻抗警报进行重新编程,以试图减少不适当的电击。

目的

本研究旨在评估Fidelis导线骨折的风险如何随时间变化,召回后编程的导线阻抗警报阈值是否能预防不适当的电击,以及导线骨折的预测因素。

方法

我们收集了所有导线骨折的临床和设备询问数据,并进行了Kaplan-Meier分析。我们进行了一项病例对照研究,以检查导线骨折的单因素和多因素预测因素。

结果

在我们的480根Sprint Fidelis(型号6949)导线队列中,有17根导线发生骨折,中位随访时间为19.8个月。骨折风险随时间显著增加,幂为2.74(95%置信区间:2.57至2.91,P<.0001)。重新编程的导线阻抗阈值仅在6例患者中的1例中预防了不适当的电击。导线骨折的独立预测因素是左心室射血分数较高(P=.0011)和非头静脉通路(P=.0224)。

结论

导线骨折风险随时间增加,幂为2.74。重新编程的导线阻抗阈值仅在6例患者中的1例中预防了不适当的电击。导线骨折的独立预测因素是左心室射血分数较高和非头静脉通路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验