• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Characteristics of Sprint Fidelis lead failure.Sprint Fidelis 导联故障的特征。
Neth Heart J. 2010 Jan;18(1):12-7.
2
Lead integrity alert algorithm decreases inappropriate shocks in patients who have Sprint Fidelis pace-sense conductor fractures.导联完整性警示算法可降低 Sprint Fidelis 起搏感知导线断裂患者中不适当电击的发生率。
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Aug;7(8):1048-55. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.015. Epub 2010 May 21.
3
Increasing hazard of Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure.美敦力 Sprint Fidelis植入式心脏复律除颤器导线故障风险增加。
Heart Rhythm. 2009 May;6(5):605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.024. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
4
Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.小直径高压植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的早期故障
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Jul;4(7):892-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.03.041. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
5
Failure of impedance monitoring to prevent adverse clinical events caused by fracture of a recalled high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.阻抗监测未能预防因召回的高压植入式心脏复律除颤器导线断裂引起的不良临床事件。
Heart Rhythm. 2008 Jun;5(6):775-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.02.039. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Outcome of the Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead advisory: a report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee.菲德利斯植入式心脏复律除颤器导线咨询的结果:加拿大心律学会设备咨询委员会的报告。
Heart Rhythm. 2008 May;5(5):639-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.029. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
7
The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis® lead history revisited-Extended follow-up of passive leads.美敦力 Sprint Fidelis® 导线历史回顾——被动导线的延长随访
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;42(12):1529-1533. doi: 10.1111/pace.13820. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Lead electrical parameters may not predict integrity of the Sprint Fidelis ICD lead.主导电参数可能无法预测 Sprint Fidelis ICD 导联的完整性。
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Sep;9(9):1446-51. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.04.033. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
9
Comparison of Sprint Fidelis and Riata defibrillator lead failure rates.Sprint Fidelis 与 Riata 除颤器导联故障发生率比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):848-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
10
Sensing failure associated with the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead.与美敦力Sprint Fidelis除颤器导线相关的感知故障。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Mar;19(3):270-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01058.x. Epub 2007 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary on the Recent Medtronic Recall, Current Management Strategy, and Multidisciplinary Approaches for Future Directions.关于美敦力近期召回事件、当前管理策略及未来方向的多学科方法的评论
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 3;13(23):e034548. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034548. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design.导丝评估和除颤可靠性研究的原理和设计:新型 ICD 导丝设计的安全性和有效性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Feb;34(2):257-267. doi: 10.1111/jce.15747. Epub 2023 Jan 8.
3
Clinical and radiographic predictors of cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead failure at the time of initial implantation.心血管植入式电子装置初次植入时导线故障的临床和影像学预测因素
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jun 7;37(4):1086-1092. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12559. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Riata type implantable cardiac defibrillator leads: increasingly small, progressively troublesome.Riata型植入式心脏除颤器导线:尺寸越来越小,问题却越来越多。
Neth Heart J. 2013 Mar;21(3):125-6. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0377-z.
5
The Sprint Fidelis lead fracture story: time to come to our senses?美敦力 Sprint Fidelis 导线断裂事件:是时候清醒过来了吗?
Neth Heart J. 2010 Jan;18(1):4-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing hazard of Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure.美敦力 Sprint Fidelis植入式心脏复律除颤器导线故障风险增加。
Heart Rhythm. 2009 May;6(5):605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.024. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
2
Downloadable algorithm to reduce inappropriate shocks caused by fractures of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.可下载算法,用于减少植入式心脏复律除颤器导线骨折引起的不适当电击。
Circulation. 2008 Nov 18;118(21):2122-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.796136. Epub 2008 Nov 3.
3
To replace or not to replace: a systematic approach to respond to device advisories.更换还是不更换:应对设备警示的系统方法。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Feb;20(2):164-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01291.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
4
Accelerating risk of Fidelis lead fracture.菲德利斯导线骨折风险加速。
Heart Rhythm. 2008 Oct;5(10):1375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.06.024. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
5
Failure of impedance monitoring to prevent adverse clinical events caused by fracture of a recalled high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.阻抗监测未能预防因召回的高压植入式心脏复律除颤器导线断裂引起的不良临床事件。
Heart Rhythm. 2008 Jun;5(6):775-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.02.039. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Outcome of the Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead advisory: a report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee.菲德利斯植入式心脏复律除颤器导线咨询的结果:加拿大心律学会设备咨询委员会的报告。
Heart Rhythm. 2008 May;5(5):639-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.029. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
7
Sensing failure associated with the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead.与美敦力Sprint Fidelis除颤器导线相关的感知故障。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Mar;19(3):270-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01058.x. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
8
The relation between patients' outcomes and the volume of cardioverter-defibrillator implantation procedures performed by physicians treating Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的治疗医生所实施的心脏复律除颤器植入手术量与患者治疗结果之间的关系。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.063. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
9
Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective analysis.植入式心脏复律除颤器的远程监测:一项前瞻性分析。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Jun;27(6 Pt 1):757-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00524.x.

Sprint Fidelis 导联故障的特征。

Characteristics of Sprint Fidelis lead failure.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2010 Jan;18(1):12-7.

PMID:20111638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2810030/
Abstract

Background. The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis ICD lead is prone to failure and the rate of failure seems to be increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of Sprint Fidelis lead failure, the characteristics, the mode of presentation and possible predictors of lead failure.Methods and Results. The rate, characteristics and presentation of Sprint Fidelis lead failure was assessed in this single-centre survey. 619 Sprint Fidelis ICD leads were implanted at our centre between December 2004 and August 2007. The mean follow-up was 32+/-10 (range 22-60) months; 35 patients (5.7%) required a lead re-implantation because of failure of the pace-sense conductor. Mean duration of lead survival was 23+/-12 (2-46) months and the rate of failure did not stabilise during follow-up. The mode of presentation was inappropriate shocks in 16 patients (45.7%), alarm alert in 12 patients (34.3%), and detection at routine follow-up in seven patients (20%). In 31 patients (89%), interrogation data revealed a sudden rise in impedance and/or frequent short VV intervals prior to lead failure and in five patients an isolated decrease of R wave (<2.5 mV). The interrogation data were not different from patients with shocks compared with patients without shocks. The interrogation data at routine follow-up in the first three months after implant were normal and stable.Conclusion. The rate of Sprint Fidelis lead failure reaches 5.7% at a mean follow-up duration of 32 months. The rate of failure does not seem to stabilise. Routine follow-up can not predict lead failure or prevent inappropriate shocks. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:12-7.).

摘要

背景。美敦力 Sprint Fidelis 心脏 ICD 导联易于发生故障,且故障发生率似乎呈上升趋势。本研究旨在探讨 Sprint Fidelis 导联故障的发生率、特点、表现形式以及可能的预测因素。

方法和结果。本单中心研究评估了 Sprint Fidelis 导联故障的发生率、特点和表现形式。2004 年 12 月至 2007 年 8 月期间,我们中心共植入 619 根 Sprint Fidelis ICD 导联。平均随访时间为 32+/-10(范围 22-60)个月;35 例患者(5.7%)因起搏感知导体故障需要重新植入导联。平均导联生存时间为 23+/-12(2-46)个月,且在随访期间故障率并未稳定。表现形式为 16 例患者(45.7%)发生不适当电击,12 例患者(34.3%)报警提示,7 例患者(20%)在常规随访中发现。在 31 例患者(89%)中,在导联故障发生前,检测数据显示阻抗突然升高和/或频繁出现短 VV 间期,5 例患者的 R 波孤立性降低(<2.5 mV)。检测数据与发生电击的患者相比,与未发生电击的患者无差异。植入后前三个月的常规随访中的检测数据正常且稳定。

结论。在平均 32 个月的随访期间,Sprint Fidelis 导联故障的发生率达到 5.7%。故障发生率似乎并未稳定。常规随访无法预测导联故障或防止不适当电击。(荷兰心脏杂志 2010;18:12-7。)