Reeves Barnaby C, Murphy Gavin J
Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Oct;21(5):669-73. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32830dd087.
Literature since 2006 was reviewed to identify the harms and costs of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.
Several studies, on people having various cardiac surgery operations, found strong associations of RBC transfusion with mortality and postoperative morbidity. The effect on mortality was strongest close to the time of operation but extended to 5 years. Morbidity outcomes included serious wound and systemic infections, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, low cardiac index, myocardial infarction, and stroke. RBC transfusion was also strongly associated with increased intensive care and ward postoperative stay, and hence increased cost of admission; available studies did not consider all resources used and the associated costs.
The harms of RBC transfusion have potentially serious and long-term consequences for patients and are costly for health services. This evidence should shift clinicians' equipoise towards more restrictive transfusion practice. The immediate aim should be to avoid transfusing small numbers of RBC units for general malaise attributed to anaemia, a practice which appears to occur in about 50% of transfused patients. Randomized trials comparing restrictive and liberal transfusion triggers are urgently needed to compare directly the balance of benefits and harms from RBC transfusion.
回顾2006年以来的文献,以确定红细胞(RBC)输血的危害和成本。
多项针对接受各种心脏手术的患者的研究发现,RBC输血与死亡率和术后发病率密切相关。对死亡率的影响在手术时最为强烈,但会持续至5年。发病结果包括严重伤口和全身感染、肾衰竭、通气时间延长、心脏指数降低、心肌梗死和中风。RBC输血还与重症监护和术后病房住院时间延长密切相关,因此住院成本增加;现有研究未考虑所有使用的资源及相关成本。
RBC输血的危害对患者可能产生严重且长期的后果,对医疗服务而言成本高昂。这一证据应促使临床医生在输血实践中更加倾向于采取限制性做法。当前的目标应是避免因贫血引起的全身不适而输注少量RBC单位,这种做法在约50%的输血患者中似乎存在。迫切需要进行比较限制性和宽松输血触发因素的随机试验,以直接比较RBC输血的利弊平衡。