Sohn Dong-Seok, Lee Ji-Soo, Ahn Mi-Ra, Shin Hong-In
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Implant Dent. 2008 Sep;17(3):321-31. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318182f01b.
Various sinus augmentation procedures, using bone substitutes, have been used to place dental implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla. The aim of this article is to evaluate the possibility of new bone formation in the maxillary sinus without a bone graft.
Ten patients without significant sinus pathosis were selected for this study. The bony window was prepared in the lateral wall using the ultrasonic piezoelectric bone surgery device (Surgybone, Silfradent srl, Sofia, Italy). The sinus membrane was elevated superiorly and implants were placed simultaneously to maintain the space under the sinus membrane for new bone formation. As the methods of sealing the lateral access window of the sinus, patients were divided into 2 groups. Nonresorbable membrane was used to seal the lateral access window of the maxillary sinus after implant placement in 5 cases (group A). Replaceable bony window was used to seal the lateral wall of the sinus in another 5 cases (group B). Computed tomograms were taken immediately before and after surgery, at the uncovering of the implant, and after a 6 month healing period. A bone biopsy was taken on the previous bony window area to evaluate new bone formation.
A total of 21 implants in lengths of 10 to 15 mm (mean, 13 mm) were placed, with an average residual bone height of 5 mm (range, 1-9 mm). All implants remained stable during the study period in clinical evaluations. New bone formation and new sinus floors were found in radiographic and histologic evaluations.
The human study showed the capacity of new bone formation in the maxillary sinus with membrane elevation only and simultaneous implant placement beyond the original sinus floor. New bone formation without additional bone graft in the maxillary sinus is revealed from the clinical, radiographic, and histologic results, but furthermore long-term studies are needed to confirm this.
多种使用骨替代物的鼻窦增高术已被用于在上颌后牙区萎缩部位植入牙种植体。本文旨在评估在上颌窦内不进行骨移植而形成新骨的可能性。
本研究选取了10例无明显鼻窦病变的患者。使用超声压电骨手术设备(Surgybone,Silfradent srl,意大利索非亚)在侧壁制备骨窗。将鼻窦黏膜向上抬起并同时植入种植体,以维持鼻窦黏膜下方的空间用于新骨形成。作为封闭鼻窦外侧进入窗口的方法,将患者分为2组。5例患者在种植体植入后使用不可吸收膜封闭上颌窦外侧进入窗口(A组)。另外5例患者使用可替换骨窗封闭鼻窦侧壁(B组)。在手术前后、种植体暴露时以及6个月愈合期后进行计算机断层扫描。在前述骨窗区域进行骨活检以评估新骨形成情况。
共植入21枚长度为10至15毫米(平均13毫米)的种植体,平均剩余骨高度为5毫米(范围为1至9毫米)。在临床评估中,所有种植体在研究期间均保持稳定。在影像学和组织学评估中发现了新骨形成和新的鼻窦底。
人体研究表明,仅通过抬高黏膜并同时在上颌窦原底部之外植入种植体,上颌窦具有形成新骨的能力。从临床、影像学和组织学结果来看,上颌窦内无需额外骨移植即可形成新骨,但还需要进一步的长期研究来证实这一点。