Suppr超能文献

为轻度至中度活动性克罗恩病患者的诱导研究确定克罗恩病活动指数的最佳反应标准。

Defining the optimal response criteria for the Crohn's disease activity index for induction studies in patients with mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease.

作者信息

Thia Kelvin T, Sandborn William J, Lewis James D, Loftus Edward V, Feagan Brian G, Steinhart A Hillary, Hanauer Stephen B, Persson Tore, Sands Bruce E

机构信息

Miles & Shirley Fiterman Center for Digestive Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Dec;103(12):3123-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02176.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is used to judge efficacy in clinical trials. We explored the effect of CDAI response definitions for induction on study efficiency.

METHODS

We analyzed primary CDAI data from induction studies in patients with mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease, not receiving concomitant aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, or immunomodulator therapy, and without fistulizing or stricturing complications. The 12 definitions of clinical response included: CDAI decrease from baseline by 50, 70, 100, or 150 points; decrease by 25% from baseline and by 70 or 100 points; CDAI <100 or 150 points; CDAI <150 points plus decrease by 70 or 100 points; CDAI <150 points at any time sustained for the duration of the trial; or decrease in the CDAI by 70 points for the last two consecutive visits. Response definitions were ranked according to ability to optimize the effect difference between treatment arms. The effect of time, baseline disease activity (CDAI 200-299 or > or =300 points), and previous surgical resections on response definitions were evaluated and ranked. Multivariate analysis on additional factors of age (<40 or > or =40 yr), gender and duration of disease (<2 or > or =2 yr) were performed to determine predictors of response when applied to these CDAI definitions.

RESULTS

Treatment effect differences in placebo-controlled studies were maximized by response definitions that incorporated either a decrease CDAI > or =70 points for the last two consecutive visits or decrease in baseline CDAI > or =100 points, and remained optimal when evaluated for the composite effect of time, baseline activity, and prior resections. A decrease in baseline CDAI > or =100 points had some advantages over a decrease CDAI > or =70 points over two visits in terms of study efficiency, as it produced a lower control response rate and was not influenced by any of the baseline factors.

CONCLUSION

Clinical trial efficiency for induction studies in patients with mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease can be improved by using either a decrease in CDAI by > or =70 points for the last two consecutive visits or a decrease in baseline CDAI by > or =100 points as the primary end point for the trial. These findings are valid for patients with ileocecal Crohn's disease not refractory to aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologics, and patients who do not have stricturing or penetrating complications. It is unclear if these CDAI response criteria would similarly increase study efficiency in trials that recruited patients with moderately to severely active disease, patients refractory to aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologics, and patients with stricturing or penetrating complications.

摘要

目的

克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)用于判断临床试验中的疗效。我们探讨了CDAI诱导反应定义对研究效率的影响。

方法

我们分析了轻度至中度活动性克罗恩病患者诱导研究的主要CDAI数据,这些患者未接受氨基水杨酸类、皮质类固醇或免疫调节剂联合治疗,且无瘘管形成或狭窄并发症。临床反应的12种定义包括:CDAI较基线下降50、70、100或150分;较基线下降25%且下降70或100分;CDAI<100或150分;CDAI<150分且下降70或100分;在试验期间任何时间CDAI<150分持续存在;或在最后两次连续访视时CDAI下降70分。根据优化治疗组间效应差异的能力对反应定义进行排序。评估并排序时间、基线疾病活动度(CDAI 200 - 299或≥300分)和既往手术切除对反应定义的影响。对年龄(<40岁或≥40岁)、性别和病程(<2年或≥2年)等其他因素进行多变量分析,以确定应用这些CDAI定义时反应的预测因素。

结果

在安慰剂对照研究中,通过纳入最后两次连续访视时CDAI下降≥70分或基线CDAI下降≥100分的反应定义,治疗效应差异最大化,并且在评估时间、基线活动度和既往切除的综合效应时仍保持最佳。就研究效率而言,基线CDAI下降≥100分比两次访视时CDAI下降≥70分具有一些优势,因为它产生的对照反应率较低,且不受任何基线因素影响。

结论

对于轻度至中度活动性克罗恩病患者的诱导研究,通过将最后两次连续访视时CDAI下降≥70分或基线CDAI下降≥100分作为试验的主要终点,可以提高临床试验效率。这些发现适用于对氨基水杨酸类、皮质类固醇、免疫调节剂和生物制剂不耐药的回盲部克罗恩病患者,以及无狭窄或穿透性并发症的患者。尚不清楚这些CDAI反应标准是否会同样提高招募中度至重度活动性疾病患者、对氨基水杨酸类、皮质类固醇免疫调节剂和生物制剂耐药的患者以及有狭窄或穿透性并发症患者的试验的研究效率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验