Wise Thomas N, Meyers Adam L, Desaiah Durisala, Mallinckrodt Craig H, Robinson Michael J, Kajdasz Daniel K
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md, USA.
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;10(4):270-5. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v10n0401.
Functional impairment is associated with major depressive disorder (MDD), and patients with MDD often present with somatic symptoms.
To examine the relationships between improved global functioning and core depressive symptoms as well as painful and nonpainful somatic symptoms in patients with MDD.
This post hoc analysis of 2 identical trials compared the efficacy of duloxetine with that of paroxetine or placebo as treatment of MDD. In the trials, patients with DSM-IV-defined MDD received duloxetine 80 mg/day (N = 188), duloxetine 120 mg/day (N = 196), paroxetine 20 mg/day (N = 183), or placebo (N = 192) for 8 weeks. The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), Maier subscale of the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 21-item Somatic Symptom Inventory, and Visual Analog Scale for overall pain were used to measure functional impairment, core symptoms of depression, and nonpainful and painful somatic symptoms, respectively. Baseline-to-endpoint mean changes in SDS total and subdomains were measured using analysis of variance with last-observation-carried-forward Pearson partial correlations, and path analysis was used to assess the significance of associations and relative contributions of improvement in global functional impairment, depression, and somatic symptoms. The trials were conducted from November 2000 to July 2002.
The difference between antidepressant treatment and placebo in SDS total and subdomains was significant (p < .001). At baseline and in change from baseline to endpoint, associations between global functional impairment and core depressive and somatic symptoms were all significant (p < .05). Path analysis demonstrated improvement of functional impairment attributed to treatment effect as 37.0% (core depressive symptoms), 13.0% (nonpainful somatic symptoms), and 11.0% (painful somatic symptoms).
In patients with MDD, over a third of functional improvement associated with antidepressant therapy was mediated through improvement in core depressive symptoms. In addition, a significant proportion of functional improvement, although to a lesser degree, was associated with the treatment of both nonpainful and painful somatic symptoms.
功能损害与重度抑郁症(MDD)相关,且MDD患者常伴有躯体症状。
探讨MDD患者整体功能改善与核心抑郁症状以及疼痛性和非疼痛性躯体症状之间的关系。
对两项相同试验进行的事后分析,比较了度洛西汀与帕罗西汀或安慰剂治疗MDD的疗效。在试验中,符合DSM-IV定义的MDD患者接受80mg/天度洛西汀(N = 188)、120mg/天度洛西汀(N = 196)、20mg/天帕罗西汀(N = 183)或安慰剂(N = 192)治疗8周。使用Sheehan残疾量表(SDS)、17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表的迈尔子量表、21项躯体症状量表以及整体疼痛视觉模拟量表,分别测量功能损害、抑郁核心症状以及非疼痛性和疼痛性躯体症状。使用末次观察结转Pearson偏相关的方差分析测量SDS总分及各子域从基线到终点的平均变化,并采用路径分析评估整体功能损害、抑郁和躯体症状改善之间关联的显著性及相对贡献。试验于2000年11月至2002年7月进行。
抗抑郁治疗与安慰剂在SDS总分及各子域上的差异具有显著性(p <.001)。在基线时以及从基线到终点的变化中,整体功能损害与核心抑郁及躯体症状之间的关联均具有显著性(p <.05)。路径分析显示,治疗效果导致的功能损害改善中,37.0%归因于核心抑郁症状,13.0%归因于非疼痛性躯体症状,11.0%归因于疼痛性躯体症状。
在MDD患者中,抗抑郁治疗相关的功能改善超过三分之一是通过核心抑郁症状的改善介导的。此外,相当一部分功能改善(尽管程度较小)与非疼痛性和疼痛性躯体症状的治疗相关。