Clark Simon, Cross Martin L, Smith Alan, Court Pinar, Vipond Julia, Nadian Allan, Hewinson R Glyn, Batchelor Hannah K, Perrie Yvonne, Williams Ann, Aldwell Frank E, Chambers Mark A
Health Protection Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, United Kingdom.
Vaccine. 2008 Oct 29;26(46):5791-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.08.028. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) caused by infection with Mycobacterium bovis is causing considerable economic loss to farmers and Government in the United Kingdom as its incidence is increasing. Efforts to control bTB in the UK are hampered by the infection in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) that represent a wildlife reservoir and source of recurrent M. bovis exposure to cattle. Vaccination of badgers with the human TB vaccine, M. bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), in oral bait represents a possible disease control tool and holds the best prospect for reaching badger populations over a wide geographical area. Using mouse and guinea pig models, we evaluated the immunogenicity and protective efficacy, respectively, of candidate badger oral vaccines based on formulation of BCG in lipid matrix, alginate beads, or a novel microcapsular hybrid of both lipid and alginate. Two different oral doses of BCG were evaluated in each formulation for their protective efficacy in guinea pigs, while a single dose was evaluated in mice. In mice, significant immune responses (based on lymphocyte proliferation and expression of IFN-gamma) were only seen with the lipid matrix and the lipid in alginate microcapsular formulation, corresponding to the isolation of viable BCG from alimentary tract lymph nodes. In guinea pigs, only BCG formulated in lipid matrix conferred protection to the spleen and lungs following aerosol route challenge with M. bovis. Protection was seen with delivery doses in the range 10(6)-10(7) CFU, although this was more consistent in the spleen at the higher dose. No protection in terms of organ CFU was seen with BCG administered in alginate beads or in lipid in alginate microcapsules, although 10(7) in the latter formulation conferred protection in terms of increasing body weight after challenge and a smaller lung to body weight ratio at necropsy. These results highlight the potential for lipid, rather than alginate, -based vaccine formulations as suitable delivery vehicles for an oral BCG vaccine in badgers.
由牛分枝杆菌感染引起的牛结核病(bTB)在英国的发病率不断上升,给农民和政府造成了相当大的经济损失。英国控制bTB的努力受到欧亚獾(Meles meles)感染的阻碍,欧亚獾是一种野生动物宿主,也是牛反复接触牛分枝杆菌的来源。用人类结核病疫苗卡介苗(BCG)口服诱饵对獾进行疫苗接种是一种可能的疾病控制工具,也是在广泛地理区域覆盖獾种群的最佳前景。我们使用小鼠和豚鼠模型,分别评估了基于脂质基质、藻酸盐珠或脂质与藻酸盐的新型微囊杂种制剂的候选獾口服疫苗的免疫原性和保护效力。每种制剂评估了两种不同口服剂量的BCG对豚鼠的保护效力,而对小鼠评估了单一剂量。在小鼠中,仅脂质基质和脂质藻酸盐微囊制剂观察到显著的免疫反应(基于淋巴细胞增殖和IFN-γ表达),这与从消化道淋巴结分离出活的BCG相对应。在豚鼠中,在用牛分枝杆菌气溶胶途径攻击后,仅脂质基质中配制的BCG对脾脏和肺部有保护作用。在10(6)-10(7) CFU的递送剂量下观察到了保护作用,尽管在较高剂量下在脾脏中更一致。藻酸盐珠中或脂质藻酸盐微囊中施用的BCG在器官CFU方面没有观察到保护作用,尽管后一种制剂中的10(7)在攻击后在体重增加和尸检时较小的肺与体重比方面提供了保护作用。这些结果突出了基于脂质而非藻酸盐的疫苗制剂作为獾口服BCG疫苗合适递送载体的潜力。