Twigg Di, Duffield Christine
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, WA 6008, Australia; University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jan;46(1):131-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
This paper critically reviews various approaches to measuring nursing workload to provide a context for the introduction of a different approach to staffing. Nurse hours per patient day (NHPPD), which classifies wards into various groupings, was applied to all public hospitals in Western Australia.
This method was introduced in response to industrial imperatives to determine reasonable workloads for nurses. As a result, the limited evaluation has focused only on the impact on workload management; reporting target versus actual nurse hours, staff retention and nurse feedback. This method improved ward staffing significantly without imposing restrictive nurse-to-patient ratios and facilitates the use of professional discretion within ward groupings to enable diversion of resources to match reported acuity changes.
While successful in attracting nurses back into hospitals and increasing nursing numbers, there is no empirical evidence of the impact this method had on patient outcomes or whether the guiding principles used in the development of this method are appropriate. The model would also benefit from further refinement to be more sensitive to direct acuity measures.
本文批判性地审视了测量护理工作量的各种方法,以便为引入一种不同的人员配置方法提供背景。“每名患者每天护士工时”(NHPPD)将病房分为不同类别,并应用于西澳大利亚州的所有公立医院。
引入该方法是为了应对行业需求,以确定护士的合理工作量。因此,有限的评估仅集中在对工作量管理的影响上;报告目标护士工时与实际护士工时、员工留用情况及护士反馈。该方法在不强制规定严格的护士与患者比例的情况下显著改善了病房人员配置,并有助于在病房分组内运用专业判断力,以便调配资源以应对所报告的病情严重程度变化。
虽然该方法成功吸引护士重返医院并增加了护士数量,但没有实证证据表明该方法对患者结局有何影响,也没有证据表明该方法制定过程中所采用的指导原则是否恰当。该模型还需要进一步完善,以对直接的病情严重程度测量更为敏感。