Suppr超能文献

老年女性骨折后的护理:最佳护理与实际护理之间的差距。

Postfracture care for older women: gaps between optimal care and actual care.

作者信息

Metge Colleen J, Leslie William D, Manness Lori-Jean, Yogendran Marina, Yuen C K, Kvern Brent

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy at Manitoba Centre for Health Policy in Department of Community Health Sciences in Faculty of Medicine at University of Manitoba in Winnipeg.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2008 Sep;54(9):1270-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate rates of assessment and treatment of osteoporosis among older women during the year after they have had fractures.

DESIGN

Observational, historical, population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Manitoba, which maintains a comprehensive population-based repository of health care services provided and has a publicly funded health care system.

PARTICIPANTS

Women 50 years old and older who had suffered fractures between 1997 and 2002. These women were chosen from among approximately 175,000 women of this age in Manitoba.

METHODS

We examined each woman's annual medical record between April 1, 1997, and March 31, 2002, to find any International Classification of Diseases fracture codes that have been consistently associated with osteoporosis. We looked for postfracture care during the first 12 months after fractures: bone mineral density (BMD) testing or treated with osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Analysis was stratified by type of fracture: designated type 1 fractures (spine or hip) and type 2 fractures (not spine or hip).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Use of BMD testing or osteoporosis pharmacotherapy during the first 12 months following fractures.

RESULTS

For type 1 fractures, BMD assessment during the first year after fracture increased from 2.6% in 1997-1998 to 4.6% in 2001-2002 (P for trend .0004). Rates of therapy with osteoporosis medication increased from 4.9% in 1997-1998 to 17.6% in 2001-2002 (P for trend < .0001). Results were similar for type 2 fractures. In the final year of the study, only 20.5% of women with either type of fracture underwent any identifiable intervention (BMD assessment or osteoporosis pharmacotherapy). The intervention rate was substantially higher among women 50 to 64 years old (26.4%) than among those 75 years old or older (17.9%, P for trend < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Women at highest risk of future fractures are assessed infrequently for osteoporosis with BMD testing and given pharmacotherapy to prevent future fractures just as infrequently. This gap in care was particularly striking for BMD testing despite the fact that testing is free in Manitoba's publicly funded system. Data from this study could be educational for physicians treating osteoporosis and should encourage them to improve their practice patterns and optimize patient care.

摘要

目的

调查老年女性骨折后一年内骨质疏松症的评估和治疗率。

设计

基于人群的观察性历史队列研究。

背景

曼尼托巴省维护了一个全面的基于人群的医疗服务信息库,且拥有公共资助的医疗保健系统。

参与者

1997年至2002年间发生骨折的50岁及以上女性。这些女性从曼尼托巴省约17.5万名这个年龄段的女性中选取。

方法

我们查阅了每位女性在1997年4月1日至2002年3月31日期间的年度医疗记录,以查找任何与骨质疏松症一直相关的国际疾病分类骨折编码。我们查找骨折后前12个月内的骨折后护理情况:骨密度(BMD)检测或接受骨质疏松症药物治疗。分析按骨折类型分层:指定的1型骨折(脊柱或髋部)和2型骨折(非脊柱或髋部)。

主要观察指标

骨折后前12个月内BMD检测或骨质疏松症药物治疗的使用情况。

结果

对于1型骨折,骨折后第一年的BMD评估从1997 - 1998年的2.6%增至2001 - 2002年的4.6%(趋势P值为0.0004)。骨质疏松症药物治疗率从1997 - 1998年的4.9%增至2001 - 2002年的17.6%(趋势P值<0.0001)。2型骨折的结果类似。在研究的最后一年,仅有2种骨折类型的女性中只有20.5%接受了任何可识别的干预(BMD评估或骨质疏松症药物治疗)。50至64岁女性的干预率(26.4%)显著高于75岁及以上女性(17.9%,趋势P值<0.0001)。

结论

未来骨折风险最高的女性很少接受BMD检测来评估骨质疏松症,接受预防未来骨折的药物治疗的情况同样少见。尽管在曼尼托巴省的公共资助系统中检测是免费的,但这种护理差距在BMD检测方面尤为明显。本研究数据可能对治疗骨质疏松症的医生具有教育意义,并应促使他们改进诊疗模式并优化患者护理。

相似文献

4
Preventing osteoporosis-related fractures: an overview.预防骨质疏松症相关骨折:概述
Am J Med. 2006 Apr;119(4 Suppl 1):S3-S11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.12.017.

引用本文的文献

9
[Osteoporosis: therapy in interface management].[骨质疏松症:界面管理中的治疗]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2013 Oct;163(19-20):455-61. doi: 10.1007/s10354-013-0238-9. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

5
High quality care for people with chronic diseases.为慢性病患者提供高质量护理。
BMJ. 2005 Mar 19;330(7492):609-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7492.609.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验