Nakamura Tsutomu, Oguma Hidetoshi, Sasagawa Tsuyoshi, Ota Masaho, Kitamura Yoichi, Yamamoto Masakazu
Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Jul-Aug;55(85):1332-7.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate usefulness of esophagogastrectomy via left thoracoabdominal (LT) approach for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), the results of surgery stratified by Siewert's classification, were analyzed retrospectively.
The tumor diameter, distance of the proximal tumor border from the esophagogastric junction, and length of the esophagus in the resected specimens of consecutive 171 AEG patients were measured. The surgical approach was classified as total esophagectomy (TE), esophagogastrectomy via LT, or transhiatal/abdominal (HA) approach.
Sixteen patients underwent TE, 71 had LT, and 84 had HA. Overall survival of the TE and LT groups was significantly lower than that of the HA group. The difference was seen between LT and HA for type II T3 tumors, but the tumor diameter in LT was significantly larger than that in HA. The approach could not be determined by Siewert's classification, but by distance of proximal tumor border from the junction. The tumors with distance over 5cm might be indicated for the TE approach; 5-3cm, the LT; within 3cm, the HA. The percentage of patients in whom the LT approach is indicated might be only 19%.
Left thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy may be valid for some AEG.
背景/目的:为评估经左胸腹联合(LT)入路行食管胃切除术治疗食管胃交界腺癌(AEG)的有效性,对根据Siewert分类分层的手术结果进行回顾性分析。
测量连续171例AEG患者切除标本的肿瘤直径、肿瘤近端边界距食管胃交界的距离以及食管长度。手术入路分为全食管切除术(TE)、经LT入路食管胃切除术或经裂孔/腹部(HA)入路。
16例患者接受了TE,71例接受了LT,84例接受了HA。TE组和LT组的总生存率显著低于HA组。II型T3肿瘤在LT组和HA组之间存在差异,但LT组的肿瘤直径显著大于HA组。手术入路不能根据Siewert分类确定,而应由肿瘤近端边界距交界的距离决定。距离超过5cm的肿瘤可能适合TE入路;5 - 3cm适合LT入路;3cm以内适合HA入路。适合LT入路的患者比例可能仅为19%。
左胸腹联合食管胃切除术对某些AEG可能有效。