J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;14(6):263-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.14.6.263.
Leg length inequalities result from a variety of clinical abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to compare repeated leg length measurements taken by two examiners with two devices during a single session. The two devices that were used were a standard tape measure and a Metrecom. Since reliability coefficients do not fully describe the comparability of measurements, ANOVAs were used to describe differences, and Pearson correlations were used to describe relationships between measurements of leg length obtained by the two examiners using the two instruments. Results of the study showed that although reliability and correlation coefficients are high between testers and devices, significant differences in measurements exist between both testers and devices. The measures found to be most comparable were those taken by one examiner using one device. The authors concluded that for clinical purposes, the tape measure may be the more practical device based on its price. It was theorized, however, that in cases of asymmetry or orthopaedic deformity, the accuracy of the Metrecom may be superior. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991;14(6):263-268.
腿长差异是由各种临床异常引起的。本研究的目的是比较两名检查者在单次检查中使用两种设备重复测量的腿长。使用的两种设备是标准卷尺和 Metrecom。由于可靠性系数不能完全描述测量的可比性,因此使用方差分析来描述差异,并使用 Pearson 相关系数来描述两名检查者使用两种仪器测量腿长的结果之间的关系。研究结果表明,尽管测试者和设备之间的可靠性和相关系数较高,但测试者和设备之间的测量值存在显著差异。发现最具可比性的是一名检查者使用一种设备进行的测量。作者得出结论,从临床角度来看,由于其价格低廉,卷尺可能是更实用的设备。然而,有人推测,在不对称或骨科畸形的情况下,Metrecom 的准确性可能更高。《矫形与运动物理治疗杂志》1991 年;14(6):263-268。