J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1988;9(11):365-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1988.9.11.365.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between positions for absolute and relative isokinetic leg flexion and extension strength as well as ipsilateral and bilateral ratios of NCAA Division II university football players. Fifty-five players (19.8 +/- 1.4 years) volunteered to be measured using a Cybex IP dynamometer at 180 and 300 degrees /sec. The players were grouped into four positions: offensive backs and receivers (OB), offensive linemen (OL), defensive linemen (DL), and defensive backs (DB). One-way ANOVA with Scheffe post hoc comparisons indicated that for absolute flexion and extension strength the linemen (OL and DL) tended to be stronger than the backs (06 and DB); however, these relationships were reversed (backs were stronger than linemen) when differences in body weight were considered (peak torque/body weight). There were no significant (p < 0.05) differences between positions for ipsilateral comparisons at 180 or 300 degrees /sec. However, the magnitude of the ratio was specific to the speed of contraction. Significant differences between positions were found for bilateral strength ratios measured at 180 degrees /sec; however, all values were within 7% of equity and therefore were of little physiological consequence.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1988;9(11):365-369.
本研究旨在评估 NCAA 二级大学美式足球运动员在进行绝对和相对等速腿屈伸力量时,不同体位之间的差异,以及同侧和双侧的比值。55 名运动员(19.8 +/- 1.4 岁)自愿使用 Cybex IP 测力计在 180 和 300 度/秒的速度下进行测量。运动员被分为四个位置:进攻后卫和接球手(OB)、进攻线锋(OL)、防守线锋(DL)和防守后卫(DB)。单因素方差分析和 Scheffe 事后比较表明,对于绝对屈伸力量,线锋(OL 和 DL)的力量往往强于后卫(OB 和 DB);然而,当考虑体重差异时(峰值扭矩/体重),这种关系就会逆转(后卫比线锋更强)。在 180 或 300 度/秒的速度下,同侧比较在体位之间没有显著差异(p < 0.05)。然而,收缩速度的比值幅度是特定的。在 180 度/秒测量的双侧力量比值在体位之间存在显著差异;然而,所有值都在 7%的权益范围内,因此没有什么生理意义。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1988;9(11):365-369.