• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生足球运动员等速腿屈伸肌力。

Isokinetic leg flexion and extension strength of university football players.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1988;9(11):365-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1988.9.11.365.

DOI:10.2519/jospt.1988.9.11.365
PMID:18796986
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between positions for absolute and relative isokinetic leg flexion and extension strength as well as ipsilateral and bilateral ratios of NCAA Division II university football players. Fifty-five players (19.8 +/- 1.4 years) volunteered to be measured using a Cybex IP dynamometer at 180 and 300 degrees /sec. The players were grouped into four positions: offensive backs and receivers (OB), offensive linemen (OL), defensive linemen (DL), and defensive backs (DB). One-way ANOVA with Scheffe post hoc comparisons indicated that for absolute flexion and extension strength the linemen (OL and DL) tended to be stronger than the backs (06 and DB); however, these relationships were reversed (backs were stronger than linemen) when differences in body weight were considered (peak torque/body weight). There were no significant (p < 0.05) differences between positions for ipsilateral comparisons at 180 or 300 degrees /sec. However, the magnitude of the ratio was specific to the speed of contraction. Significant differences between positions were found for bilateral strength ratios measured at 180 degrees /sec; however, all values were within 7% of equity and therefore were of little physiological consequence.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1988;9(11):365-369.

摘要

本研究旨在评估 NCAA 二级大学美式足球运动员在进行绝对和相对等速腿屈伸力量时,不同体位之间的差异,以及同侧和双侧的比值。55 名运动员(19.8 +/- 1.4 岁)自愿使用 Cybex IP 测力计在 180 和 300 度/秒的速度下进行测量。运动员被分为四个位置:进攻后卫和接球手(OB)、进攻线锋(OL)、防守线锋(DL)和防守后卫(DB)。单因素方差分析和 Scheffe 事后比较表明,对于绝对屈伸力量,线锋(OL 和 DL)的力量往往强于后卫(OB 和 DB);然而,当考虑体重差异时(峰值扭矩/体重),这种关系就会逆转(后卫比线锋更强)。在 180 或 300 度/秒的速度下,同侧比较在体位之间没有显著差异(p < 0.05)。然而,收缩速度的比值幅度是特定的。在 180 度/秒测量的双侧力量比值在体位之间存在显著差异;然而,所有值都在 7%的权益范围内,因此没有什么生理意义。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1988;9(11):365-369.

相似文献

1
Isokinetic leg flexion and extension strength of university football players.大学生足球运动员等速腿屈伸肌力。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1988;9(11):365-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1988.9.11.365.
2
Isokinetic torque levels for high school football players.高中橄榄球运动员的等速肌力水平。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Mar;60(3):110-4.
3
Comparison of physical and performance characteristics of NCAA Division I football players: 1987 and 2000.1987年与2000年美国大学体育协会第一分区橄榄球运动员身体和表现特征的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2004 May;18(2):286-91. doi: 10.1519/R-12852.1.
4
Isokinetic concentric quadriceps and hamstring normative data for elite collegiate American football players participating in the NFL Scouting Combine.优秀大学生美式足球运动员参加 NFL 选秀联合试训的等速向心股四头肌和腘绳肌正常值数据。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Apr;28(4):875-83. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a20f19.
5
Kinanthropometric Characteristic Comparisons of NCAA Division I Offensive and Defensive Linemen Spanning 8 Decades.八十年来美国大学体育协会第一分区进攻线与防守线球员的人体测量特征比较
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Dec 1;36(12):3404-3408. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004179. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
6
Lower-extremity isokinetic strength profiling in professional rugby league and rugby union.职业英式橄榄球联盟和联盟式橄榄球运动员下肢等速肌力特征分析。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Mar;9(2):358-61. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0129. Epub 2013 May 22.
7
STRENGTH & FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF HEALTHY HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL PLAYERS: ANALYSIS OF SKILLED AND NON-SKILLED POSITIONS.健康高中橄榄球运动员的力量与功能评估:熟练与非熟练位置分析
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Nov;10(6):850-7.
8
Equipment and running surface alter sprint performance of college football players.设备和跑道表面会改变大学橄榄球运动员的短跑成绩。
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Nov;19(4):821-5. doi: 10.1519/R-16934.1.
9
Ponderal somatogram analysis of girth measurements by position in division III college football players.对三级学院橄榄球运动员按位置进行围度测量的体格图分析。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May;23(3):788-99. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a2f156.
10
Strength and power characteristics in English elite rugby league players.英国精英橄榄球联盟运动员的力量和体能特征。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1374-84. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d687f5.

引用本文的文献

1
The rodeo athlete: sport science: part I.竞技牛仔:运动科学:第一部分。
Sports Med. 2010 May 1;40(5):417-31. doi: 10.2165/11531390-000000000-00000.
2
A physiological review of American football.美式橄榄球的生理学综述。
Sports Med. 1997 Apr;23(4):247-60. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199723040-00004.
3
Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges.力量与功率评估:问题、争议与挑战
Sports Med. 1995 Jun;19(6):401-17. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199519060-00004.