Platon Alexandra, Jlassi Helmi, Rutschmann Olivier T, Becker Christoph D, Verdun Francis R, Gervaz Pascal, Poletti Pierre-Alexandre
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, 24, rue Micheli-du-Crest, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Eur Radiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):446-54. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1164-x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-dose CT with oral contrast medium (LDCT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and compare its performance with standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT (standard CT) according to patients' BMIs. Eighty-six consecutive patients admitted with suspicion of acute appendicitis underwent LDCT (30 mAs), followed by standard CT (180 mAs). Both examinations were reviewed by two experienced radiologists for direct and indirect signs of appendicitis. Clinical and surgical follow-up was considered as the reference standard. Appendicitis was confirmed by surgery in 37 (43%) of the 86 patients. Twenty-nine (34%) patients eventually had an alternative discharge diagnosis to explain their abdominal pain. Clinical and biological follow-up was uneventful in 20 (23%) patients. LDCT and standard CT had the same sensitivity (100%, 33/33) and specificity (98%, 45/46) to diagnose appendicitis in patients with a body mass index (BMI) >or= 18.5. In slim patients (BMI<18.5), sensitivity to diagnose appendicitis was 50% (2/4) for LDCT and 100% (4/4) for standard CT, while specificity was identical for both techniques (67%, 2/3). LDCT may play a role in the diagnostic workup of patients with a BMI >or= 18.5.
本研究的目的是评估口服对比剂的低剂量CT(LDCT)对急性阑尾炎的诊断价值,并根据患者的体重指数(BMI)将其表现与标准剂量静脉注射对比增强CT(标准CT)进行比较。86例因疑似急性阑尾炎入院的连续患者先接受了LDCT(30mAs)检查,随后接受标准CT(180mAs)检查。两位经验丰富的放射科医生对两项检查结果进行了评估,以寻找阑尾炎的直接和间接征象。临床和手术随访被视为参考标准。86例患者中有37例(43%)经手术确诊为阑尾炎。29例(34%)患者最终有其他出院诊断来解释其腹痛原因。20例(23%)患者的临床和生物学随访结果正常。对于体重指数(BMI)≥18.5的患者,LDCT和标准CT诊断阑尾炎的敏感性相同(100%,33/33),特异性也相同(98%,45/46)。对于体型消瘦的患者(BMI<18.5),LDCT诊断阑尾炎的敏感性为50%(2/4),标准CT为100%(4/4),而两种技术的特异性相同(67%,2/3)。LDCT可能在BMI≥18.5患者的诊断检查中发挥作用。