Bertin Christophe L, Ponthus Simon, Vivekanantham Hari, Poletti Pierre-Alexandre, Kherad Omar, Rutschmann Olivier T
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva University, rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 2, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Division of Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3870-2.
Plain abdominal radiography (PAR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to (1) identify the indications for PAR in EDs and compare them against international guidelines, (2) uncover predictors of non-compliance with guidelines, and (3) describe the use of additional radiological examinations in EDs.
Retrospective cohort study in the EDs of two hospitals in Geneva, Switzerland, including all adult patients who underwent PAR in the EDs. Indications were considered "appropriate" if complying with guidelines. Predictors of non-compliance were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Over 1 year, PAR was performed in 1997 patients (2.2% of all admissions). Their mean age was 59.7 years, with 53.1% of female patients. The most common indications were constipation (30.8%), suspected ileus (28.9%), and abdominal pain (15.3%). According to the French and American guidelines, only 11.8% of the PARs were indicated, while 46.2% of them complied with the Australian and British guidelines. On multivariate analysis, admission to the private hospital ED (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% CI 1.78-8.45), female gender (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46-2.59), and an age > 65 years (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.74-3.32) were associated with a higher risk of inappropriate PAR. Additional radiological examinations were performed in 73.7% of patients.
Most indications for PAR did not comply with guidelines and elderly women appeared particularly at risk of being exposed to inappropriate examination. PAR did not prevent the need for additional examinations. Local guidelines should be developed, and initiatives should be implemented to reduce unnecessary PARs.
ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier NCT02980081 .
急诊部门(ED)常规开展腹部平片(PAR)检查。本研究旨在:(1)确定急诊部门进行PAR检查的指征,并与国际指南进行比较;(2)找出不遵守指南的预测因素;(3)描述急诊部门额外影像学检查的使用情况。
在瑞士日内瓦两家医院的急诊部门进行回顾性队列研究,纳入所有在急诊部门接受PAR检查的成年患者。如果符合指南,指征被视为“恰当”。通过单因素和多因素分析确定不遵守指南的预测因素。
在1年多的时间里,1997例患者接受了PAR检查(占所有入院患者的2.2%)。他们的平均年龄为59.7岁,女性患者占53.1%。最常见的指征是便秘(30.8%)、疑似肠梗阻(28.9%)和腹痛(15.3%)。根据法国和美国的指南,只有11.8%的PAR检查是有指征的,而其中46.2%符合澳大利亚和英国的指南。多因素分析显示,入住私立医院急诊部门(比值比[OR] 3.88,95%可信区间[CI] 1.78 - 8.45)、女性(OR 1.95,95%CI 1.46 - 2.59)和年龄>65岁(OR 2.41,95%CI 1.74 - 3.32)与不恰当PAR检查的风险较高相关。73.7%的患者进行了额外的影像学检查。
大多数PAR检查的指征不符合指南,老年女性似乎尤其面临接受不恰当检查的风险。PAR检查并不能避免进行额外检查的必要性。应制定当地指南,并采取措施减少不必要的PAR检查。
ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符NCT02980081 。